Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of single-cone obturation with three sealers
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: This study used micro-computed tomography (μCT) to compare voids and interfaces in single-cone obturation among AH Plus, EndoSequence BC, and prototype surface pre-reacted glass ionomer (S-PRG) sealers and to determine the percentage of sealer contact at the dentin and gutta-percha (GP) interfaces. Materials and Methods: Fifteen single-rooted human teeth were shaped using ProTaper NEXT size X5 rotary files using 2.5% NaOCl irrigation. Roots were obturated with a single-cone ProTaper NEXT GP point X5 with AH Plus, EndoSequence BC, or prototype S-PRG sealer (n = 5/group). Results: The volumes of GP, sealer, and voids were measured in the region of 0–2, 2–4, 4–6, and 6–8 mm from the apex, using image analysis of sagittal μCT scans. GP volume percentages were: AH Plus (75.5%), EndoSequence BC (87.3%), and prototype S-PRG (94.4%). Sealer volume percentages were less: AH Plus (14.3%), EndoSequence BC (6.8%), and prototype S-PRG (4.6%). Void percentages were AH Plus (10.1%), EndoSequence BC (5.9%), and prototype S-PRG (1.0%). Dentin-sealer contact ratios of AH Plus, EndoSequence BC, and prototype S-PRG groups were 82.4% ± 6.8%, 71.6% ± 25.3%, and 70.2% ± 9.4%, respectively. GP-sealer contact ratios of AH Plus, EndoSequence BC, and prototype S-PRG groups were 65.6% ± 29.1%, 80.7% ± 25.8%, and 87.0% ± 8.6%, respectively. Conclusions: Prototype S-PRG sealer created a low-void obturation, similar to EndoSequence BC sealer with similar dentin-sealer contact (> 70%) and GP-sealer contact (> 80%). Prototype S-PRG sealer presented comparable filling quality to EndoSequence BC sealer.
Abstract
Objectives: This study used micro-computed tomography (μCT) to compare voids and interfaces in single-cone obturation among AH Plus, EndoSequence BC, and prototype surface pre-reacted glass ionomer (S-PRG) sealers and to determine the percentage of sealer contact at the dentin and gutta-percha (GP) interfaces. Materials and Methods: Fifteen single-rooted human teeth were shaped using ProTaper NEXT size X5 rotary files using 2.5% NaOCl irrigation. Roots were obturated with a single-cone ProTaper NEXT GP point X5 with AH Plus, EndoSequence BC, or prototype S-PRG sealer (n = 5/group). Results: The volumes of GP, sealer, and voids were measured in the region of 0–2, 2–4, 4–6, and 6–8 mm from the apex, using image analysis of sagittal μCT scans. GP volume percentages were: AH Plus (75.5%), EndoSequence BC (87.3%), and prototype S-PRG (94.4%). Sealer volume percentages were less: AH Plus (14.3%), EndoSequence BC (6.8%), and prototype S-PRG (4.6%). Void percentages were AH Plus (10.1%), EndoSequence BC (5.9%), and prototype S-PRG (1.0%). Dentin-sealer contact ratios of AH Plus, EndoSequence BC, and prototype S-PRG groups were 82.4% ± 6.8%, 71.6% ± 25.3%, and 70.2% ± 9.4%, respectively. GP-sealer contact ratios of AH Plus, EndoSequence BC, and prototype S-PRG groups were 65.6% ± 29.1%, 80.7% ± 25.8%, and 87.0% ± 8.6%, respectively. Conclusions: Prototype S-PRG sealer created a low-void obturation, similar to EndoSequence BC sealer with similar dentin-sealer contact (> 70%) and GP-sealer contact (> 80%). Prototype S-PRG sealer presented comparable filling quality to EndoSequence BC sealer.
참고문헌 (30)
- Sjogren U, "Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment", J Endod, 16, pp.498~504 (1990)
- Ng YL, "Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature -- Part 2. Influence of clinical factors", Int Endod J, 41, pp.6~31 (2008)
- Komabayashi T, "Comprehensive review of current endodontic sealers", Dent Mater J, 39, pp.703~720 (2020)
- Lacey S, "A study of the rheological properties of endodontic sealers", Int Endod J, 38, pp.499~504 (2005)
- Schäfer E, "Percentage of gutta-percha filled areas in canals obturated with cross-linked gutta-percha core-carrier systems, single-cone and lateral compaction technique", J Endod, 42, pp.294~298 (2016)
- Ray HA, "Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration", Int Endod J, 28, pp.12~18 (1995)
- Kataoka H, "Dentin bonding and sealing ability of a new root canal resin sealer", J Endod, 26, pp.230~235 (2000)
- Zhou HM, "Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers", J Endod, 39, pp.1281~1286 (2013)
- Chybowski EA, "Clinical outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment using a single-cone technique with endosequence bioceramic sealer: a retrospective analysis", J Endod, 44, pp.941~945 (2018)
- Miki S, "Antibacterial activity of resin composites containing surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler", Dent Mater, 32, pp.1095~1102 (2016)
- Yassen GH, "Evaluation of selected properties of a new root repair cement containing surface pre-reacted glass ionomer fillers", Clin Oral Investig, 20, pp.2139~2148 (2016)
- Miyaji H, "Comparative biological assessments of endodontic root canal sealer containing surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler or silica filler", Dent Mater J, 39, pp.287~294 (2020)
- Kusaka Y, "Influence of root canal sealer containing S-PRG filler on osteogenesis in tibia of rats", J Meikai Dent Med, 47, pp.139~147 (2018)
- Keleş A, "Micro-CT evaluation of root filling quality in oval-shaped canals", Int Endod J, 47, pp.1177~1184 (2014)
- Celikten B, "Evaluation of root canal sealer filling quality using a single-cone technique in oval shaped canals: an in vitro micro-CT study", Scanning, 38, pp.133~140 (2016)
- Jain S, "Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of marginal adaptation of AH-plus, GuttaFlow, and RealSeal at apical one-third of root canals - part I: dentin-sealer interface", J Conserv Dent, 21, pp.85~89 (2018)
- Adhikari HD, "Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of marginal adaptation of AH-Plus, GuttaFlow, and RealSeal at apical one-third of root canals - part II: core-sealer interface", J Conserv Dent, 21, pp.90~94 (2018)
- Mohammadian F, "Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the sealer-dentine interface of three sealers", Iran Endod J, 12, pp.38~42 (2017)
- Eltair M, "Evaluation of the interface between gutta-percha and two types of sealers using scanning electron microscopy (SEM)", Clin Oral Investig, 22, pp.1631~1639 (2018)
- Polineni S, "Marginal adaptation of newer root canal sealers to dentin: a SEM study", J Conserv Dent, 19, pp.360~363 (2016)
- Ray H, "A new glass ionomer root canal sealer", J Endod, 17, pp.598~603 (1991)
- McMichen FR, "A comparative study of selected physical properties of five root-canal sealers", Int Endod J, 36, pp.629~635 (2003)
- Lee JK, "Physicochemical properties of epoxy resin-based and bioceramic-based root canal sealers", Bioinorg Chem Appl, 2017, pp.2582849~ (2017)
- Carrotte P, "Endodontics: Part 8. Filling the root canal system", Br Dent J, 197, pp.667~672 (2004)
- Naseri M, "Evaluation of the quality of four root canal obturation techniques using micro-computed tomography", Iran Endod J, 8, pp.89~93 (2013)
- Wolf M, "3D analyses of interface voids in root canals filled with different sealer materials in combination with warm gutta-percha technique", Clin Oral Investig, 18, pp.155~161 (2014)
- Schäfer E, "Percentage of gutta-percha-filled areas in canals instrumented with nickel-titanium systems and obturated with matching single cones", J Endod, 39, pp.924~928 (2013)
- Moeller L, "Quality of root fillings performed with two root filling techniques. An in vitro study using micro-CT", Acta Odontol Scand, 71, pp.689~696 (2013)
- Al-Haddad A, "Interfacial adaptation and thickness of bioceramic-based root canal sealers", Dent Mater J, 34, pp.516~521 (2015)
- De Gee AJ, "Sealing properties of Ketac-Endo glass ionomer cement and AH26 root canal sealers", Int Endod J, 27, pp.239~244 (1994)