Effect of maxillary sinus graft on the survival of endosseous implants: A 10-year retrospective study
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the survival rates of implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses and compare the results obtained with graft materials, implant surfaces and timing of implant placement. Materials and Methods: Between January 1996 and December 2005, 391 implants were placed in 161 patients who underwent sinus grafting treatment simultaneously or separately at Ewha Womans University Hospital. According to inclusion criteria, 272 implants were placed in 102 patients with 112 sinus grafts (30 females, 72 males), aged 26 to 88 years (mean age 49.0±9.7). The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 134 months (mean F/U 47±32). Survival rates were evaluated according to graft material, implant surface and timing of implant placement. The Kaplan-Meier procedure and the log rank (Mantel-Cox) test were used to estimate survival rates and test for equality of survival rates between different groups of patients. Results: Ten-year cumulative survival rate for implants placed in the grafted sinuses was 90.1%. The survival rates for autogenous bone, combination and bone substitutes were 94.6%, 85.9% and 100%, respectively (p > 0.05). According to implant surface, survival rates were 84.8% in machined group and 97.5% in rough group (p < 0.05). The survival rates were 92.9% in delayed group and 86.0% in simultaneous group (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Ten-year cumulative survival rate for implants placed in the grafted sinuses was 90.1%. Rough-surfaced implants have a higher survival rate than machined-surfaced implants when placed in grafted sinuses (p < 0.05). (J Korean Acad Periodontol 2008;38:309-316)
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the survival rates of implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses and compare the results obtained with graft materials, implant surfaces and timing of implant placement. Materials and Methods: Between January 1996 and December 2005, 391 implants were placed in 161 patients who underwent sinus grafting treatment simultaneously or separately at Ewha Womans University Hospital. According to inclusion criteria, 272 implants were placed in 102 patients with 112 sinus grafts (30 females, 72 males), aged 26 to 88 years (mean age 49.0±9.7). The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 134 months (mean F/U 47±32). Survival rates were evaluated according to graft material, implant surface and timing of implant placement. The Kaplan-Meier procedure and the log rank (Mantel-Cox) test were used to estimate survival rates and test for equality of survival rates between different groups of patients. Results: Ten-year cumulative survival rate for implants placed in the grafted sinuses was 90.1%. The survival rates for autogenous bone, combination and bone substitutes were 94.6%, 85.9% and 100%, respectively (p > 0.05). According to implant surface, survival rates were 84.8% in machined group and 97.5% in rough group (p < 0.05). The survival rates were 92.9% in delayed group and 86.0% in simultaneous group (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Ten-year cumulative survival rate for implants placed in the grafted sinuses was 90.1%. Rough-surfaced implants have a higher survival rate than machined-surfaced implants when placed in grafted sinuses (p < 0.05). (J Korean Acad Periodontol 2008;38:309-316)
참고문헌 (36)
- Tatum H, Jr, "Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions", Dent Clin North Am, 30, pp.207~229 (1986)
- Boyne PJ, "Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone", J Oral Surg, 38, pp.613~616 (1980)
- Jensen OT, "Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.11~45 (1996)
- Tong DC, "A review of survival rates for implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses using meta-analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.175~182 (1998)
- Wallace SS, "Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review", Ann Periodontol, 8, pp.328~343 (2003)
- Del Fabbro M, "Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 24, pp.565~577 (2004)
- Joonhea Baik, "Effects of the sinus lift augmentation on the survival of the osseointegrated dental implants placed in the posterior maxilla", The Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology, 5, pp.10~24 (2001)
- Graziani F, "Comparison of implant survival following sinus floor augmentation procedures with implants placed in pristine posterior maxillary bone: a systematic review", Clin Oral Implants Res, 15, pp.677~682 (2004)
- Froum SJ, "Sinus floor elevation using anorganic bovine bone matrix (OsteoGraf", N) with and without autogenous bone: a clinical, histologic, radiographic, and histomorphometric analysis--Part 2 of an ongoing prospective study, 1998, pp.18, 528~543
- Wheeler SL, "Six-year clinical and histologic study of sinus-lift grafts", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.26~34 (1996)
- Hallman M, "A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 17, pp.635~643 (2002)
- Buser D, "Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs", J Biomed Mater Res, 25, pp.889~902 (1991)
- Lazzara RJ, "A human histologic analysis of osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 19, pp.117~129 (1999)
- Khang W, "A multi-center study comparing dual acid-etched and machined-surfaced implants in various bone qualities", J Periodontol, 72, pp.1384~1390 (2001)
- Ioannidou E, "Osteotome sinus floor elevation and simultaneous, non-submerged implant placement: case report and literature review", J Periodontol, 71, pp.1613~1619 (2000)
- Peleg M, "Sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement in the severely atrophic maxilla", J Periodontol, 69, pp.1397~1403 (1998)
- Misch CE, "Endosteal implants and iliac crest grafts to restore severely resorbed totally edentulous maxillae--a retrospective study", J Oral Implantol, 20, pp.100~110 (1994)
- Keller EE, "Maxillary antral and nasal one-stage inlay composite bone graft: preliminary report on 30 recipient sites", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 52, pp.438~447 (1994)
- Williamson RA, "Rehabilitation of the resorbed maxilla and mandible using autogenous bone grafts and osseointegrated implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.476~488 (1996)
- Smiler DG, "Sinus lift procedure using porous hydroxyapatite: a preliminary clinical report", J Oral Implantol, 13, pp.239~253 (1987)
- Tidwell JK, "Composite grafting of the maxillary sinus for placement of endosteal implants. A preliminary report of 48 patients", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 21, pp.204~209 (1992)
- Coatoam GW, "A four-year study examining the results of indirect sinus augmentation procedures", J Oral Implantol, 23, pp.117~127 (1997)
- Misch CE, "Maxillary sinus augmentation for endosteal implants: organized alternative treatment plans", Int J Oral Implantol, 4, pp.49~58 (1987)
- Jensen J, "Varying treatment strategies for reconstruction of maxillary atrophy with implants: results in 98 patients", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 52, pp.210~216 (1994)
- Buser D, "Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 8, pp.161~172 (1997)
- Buser D, "Tissue integration of one-stage ITI implants: 3-year results of a longitudinal study with Hollow-Cylinder and Hollow-Screw implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6, pp.405~412 (1991)
- Cochran DL, "The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 13, pp.144~153 (2002)
- Moy PK, "Maxillary sinus augmentation: histomorphometric analysis of graft materials for maxillary sinus floor augmentation", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 51, pp.857~862 (1993)
- Valentini P, "Sinus grafting with porous bone mineral (Bio-Oss) for implant placement: a 5-year study on 15 patients", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 20, pp.245~253 (2000)
- Wallace SS, "Histologic evaluation of a sinus elevation procedure: a clinical report", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 16, pp.46~51 (1996)
- Keller EE, "Surgical-prosthodontic reconstruction of advanced maxillary bone compromise with autogenous onlay block bone grafts and osseointegrated endosseous implants: a 12-year study of 32 consecutive patients", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.197~209 (1999)
- Davies JE, "Mechanisms of endosseous integration", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.391~401 (1998)
- Testori T, "A multicenter prospective evaluation of 2-months loaded Osseotite implants placed in the posterior jaws: 3-year follow-up results", Clin Oral Implants Res, 13, pp.154~161 (2002)
- Jensen OT, "The Sinus Bone Graft, 2nd ed", pp.56~ (2006), Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co
- Tarnow DP, "Histologic and clinical comparison of bilateral sinus floor elevations with and without barrier membrane placement in 12 patients: Part 3 of an ongoing prospective study", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 20, pp.117~125 (2000)
- Tawil G, "Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 16, pp.713~721 (2001)
