Infusion Methods for Continuous Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Postoperative Pain Control after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Infusion methods during regional analgesia using perineural catheters may influence the quality of postoperative analgesia. This study was conducted to compare the effects of combined or bolus-only infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine on the postoperative analgesia in interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) with perineural catheterization.Methods: Patients scheduled for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were divided into two groups, one that would receive a combined infusion (group C, n = 32), and one that would receive intermittent infusion (group I, n = 32). A perineural catheter was inserted into the interscalene brachial plexus (ISBP) using ultrasound (US) and nerve stimulation, and 10 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine was administered. After the operation, group C received a continuous infusion of 4 ml/h, and a 4 ml bolus with a lockout interval of 60 min. Group I received only a 4 ml bolus, and the lockout interval was 30 min. Postoperative pain by the numeric rating scale (NRS) and the forearm muscle tone by the manual muscle test (MMT) were checked and evaluated at the following timepoints: preoperative, and postoperative 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. Supplemental opioid requirements, total consumed dose of local anesthetic, and adverse effects were compared between the two groups.Results: Sixty-four patients completed the study and the postoperative values such as operation time, time to discharge, and operation site were comparable. There were no differences in NRS scores and supplemental opioid requirements between the two groups. The MMT scores of group I at 4 and 12 h after surgery were significantly higher than those of group C (P ＜ 0.05). The total consumed dose of local anesthetic was significantly lower in group I than in group C (P ＜ 0.05). The adverse effects were not different between the groups.Conclusions: The bolus-only administration of 0.2% ropivacaine provided a similar analgesic effect with a lower total volume of local anesthetic and decreased motor weakness compared to combined infusion. There-fore, bolus-only administration is an effective postoperative analgesic method in ISBPB with perineural cathe-terization after rotator cuff repair. (Korean J Pain 2015; 28: 210-216)
Abstract
Background: Infusion methods during regional analgesia using perineural catheters may influence the quality of postoperative analgesia. This study was conducted to compare the effects of combined or bolus-only infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine on the postoperative analgesia in interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) with perineural catheterization.Methods: Patients scheduled for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were divided into two groups, one that would receive a combined infusion (group C, n = 32), and one that would receive intermittent infusion (group I, n = 32). A perineural catheter was inserted into the interscalene brachial plexus (ISBP) using ultrasound (US) and nerve stimulation, and 10 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine was administered. After the operation, group C received a continuous infusion of 4 ml/h, and a 4 ml bolus with a lockout interval of 60 min. Group I received only a 4 ml bolus, and the lockout interval was 30 min. Postoperative pain by the numeric rating scale (NRS) and the forearm muscle tone by the manual muscle test (MMT) were checked and evaluated at the following timepoints: preoperative, and postoperative 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. Supplemental opioid requirements, total consumed dose of local anesthetic, and adverse effects were compared between the two groups.Results: Sixty-four patients completed the study and the postoperative values such as operation time, time to discharge, and operation site were comparable. There were no differences in NRS scores and supplemental opioid requirements between the two groups. The MMT scores of group I at 4 and 12 h after surgery were significantly higher than those of group C (P ＜ 0.05). The total consumed dose of local anesthetic was significantly lower in group I than in group C (P ＜ 0.05). The adverse effects were not different between the groups.Conclusions: The bolus-only administration of 0.2% ropivacaine provided a similar analgesic effect with a lower total volume of local anesthetic and decreased motor weakness compared to combined infusion. There-fore, bolus-only administration is an effective postoperative analgesic method in ISBPB with perineural cathe-terization after rotator cuff repair. (Korean J Pain 2015; 28: 210-216)
참고문헌 (22)
- Shin SW, "Effective analgesia with ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair", J Anesth, 28, pp.64~69 (2014)
- Borgeat A, "Patient-controlled interscalene analgesia with ropivacaine 0.2% versus bupivacaine 0.15% after major open shoulder surgery: the effects on hand motor function", Anesth Analg, 92, pp.218~223 (2001)
- Ilfeld BM, "Infraclavicular perineural local anesthetic infusion : a comparison of three dosing regimens for postoperative analgesia", Anesthesiology, 100, pp.395~402 (2004)
- Pere P, "Local myotoxicity of bupivacaine in rabbits after continuous supraclavicular brachial plexus block", Reg Anesth, 18, pp.304~307 (1993)
- Dhir S, "Case report : ropivacaine neurotoxicity at clinical doses in interscalene brachial plexus block", Can J Anaesth, 54, pp.912~916 (2007)
- Shakespeare TJ, "Intermittent hoarseness with continuous interscalene brachial plexus catheter infusion due to deficient carotid sheath", Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 57, pp.1085~1086 (2013)
- 양춘우, "A clinical comparison of continuous interscalene brachial plexus block with different basal infusion rates of 0.2% ropivacaine for shoulder surgery", Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 59(1), pp.27~33 (2010), 대한마취통증의학회
- Norberg FB, "Repair of the rotator cuff. Mini-open and arthroscopic repairs", Clin Sports Med, 19, pp.77~99 (2000)
- Kim SH, "Arthroscopic versus mini-open salvage repair of the rotator cuff tear : outcome analysis at 2 to 6 years' follow-up", Arthroscopy, 19, pp.746~754 (2003)
- Kehlet H, "Persistent postsurgical pain : risk factors and prevention", Lancet, 367, pp.1618~1625 (2006)
- Ilfeld BM, "Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized, doubleblinded, placebo-controlled study", Anesth Analg, 96, pp.1089~1095 (2003)
- Sun Kyung Park, "A Comparison of Three Methods for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery", The Korean Journal of Pain, 28(1), pp.45~51 (2015), 대한통증학회
- Egol KA, "Regional anesthesia improves outcome in patients undergoing proximal humerus fracture repair", Bull Hosp Jt Dis, 72, pp.231~236 (2014)
- Ilfeld BM, "Continuous peripheral nerve blocks: is local anesthetic dose the only factor, or do concentration and volume influence infusion effects as well?", Anesthesiology, 112, pp.347~354 (2010)
- Fredrickson MJ, "Posterior versus anterolateral approach interscalene catheter placement : a prospective randomized trial", Reg Anesth Pain Med, 36, pp.125~133 (2011)
- Hogan Q, "Local anesthetic myotoxicity : a case and review", Anesthesiology, 80, pp.942~947 (1994)
- Zink W, "The long term myotoxic effects of bupivacaine and ropivacaine after continuous peripheral nerve blocks", Anesth Analg, 101, pp.548~554 (2005)
- Avellanet M, "Permanent upper trunk plexopathy after interscalene brachial plexus block", J Clin Monit Comput (2015)
- Jenkins CR, "An unusual complication of interscalene brachial plexus catheterization : delayed catheter migration", Br J Anaesth, 95, pp.535~537 (2005)
- Singelyn FJ, "Interscalene brachial plexus analgesia after open shoulder surgery : continuous versus patient-controlled infusion", Anesth Analg, 89, pp.1216~1220 (1999)
- Yang CW, "A randomized comparison of ropivacaine 0.1% and 0.2% for continuous interscalene block after shoulder surgery", Anesth Analg, 116, pp.730~733 (2013)
- Fredrickson MJ, "Patient-initiated mandatory boluses for ambulatory continuous interscalene analgesia : an effective strategy for optimizing analgesia and minimizing side-effects", Br J Anaesth, 106, pp.239~245 (2011)