본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

In situ dental implant installation after decontamination in a previously peri-implant diseased site: a pilot study

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine whether a previous peri-implantitis site can affect osseointegration, by comparing implant placement at a site where peri-implantitis was present and at a normal bone site. A second aim of this study was to identify the tissue and bone reaction after treating the contaminated implant surface to determine the optimal treatment for peri-implant diseases. Methods: A peri-implant mucositis model for dogs was prepared to determine the optimal treatment option for peri-implant mucositis or peri-implantitis. The implants were inserted partially to a length of 6 mm. The upper 4 mm part of the dental implants was exposed to the oral environment. Simple exposure for 2 weeks contaminated the implant surface. After 2 weeks, the implants were divided into three groups: untreated, swabbed with saline, and swabbed with H2O2. Three implants from each group were placed to the full length in the same spot. The other three implants were placed fully into newly prepared bone. After eight weeks of healing, the animals were sacrificed. Ground sections, representing the mid-buccal-lingual plane, were prepared for histological analysis. The analysis was evaluated clinically and histometrically. Results: The untreated implants and H2O2-swabbed implants showed gingival inflammation. Only the saline-swabbed implant group showed re-osseointegration and no gingival inflammation. There was no difference in regeneration height or bone-to-implant contact between in situ implant placement and implant placement in the new bone site. Conclusions: It can be concluded that cleaning with saline may be effective in implant decontamination. After implant surface decontamination, implant installation in a previous peri-implant diseased site may not interfere with osseointegration.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine whether a previous peri-implantitis site can affect osseointegration, by comparing implant placement at a site where peri-implantitis was present and at a normal bone site. A second aim of this study was to identify the tissue and bone reaction after treating the contaminated implant surface to determine the optimal treatment for peri-implant diseases. Methods: A peri-implant mucositis model for dogs was prepared to determine the optimal treatment option for peri-implant mucositis or peri-implantitis. The implants were inserted partially to a length of 6 mm. The upper 4 mm part of the dental implants was exposed to the oral environment. Simple exposure for 2 weeks contaminated the implant surface. After 2 weeks, the implants were divided into three groups: untreated, swabbed with saline, and swabbed with H2O2. Three implants from each group were placed to the full length in the same spot. The other three implants were placed fully into newly prepared bone. After eight weeks of healing, the animals were sacrificed. Ground sections, representing the mid-buccal-lingual plane, were prepared for histological analysis. The analysis was evaluated clinically and histometrically. Results: The untreated implants and H2O2-swabbed implants showed gingival inflammation. Only the saline-swabbed implant group showed re-osseointegration and no gingival inflammation. There was no difference in regeneration height or bone-to-implant contact between in situ implant placement and implant placement in the new bone site. Conclusions: It can be concluded that cleaning with saline may be effective in implant decontamination. After implant surface decontamination, implant installation in a previous peri-implant diseased site may not interfere with osseointegration.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Wennerberg A, "Current challenges in successful rehabilitation with oral implants", J Oral Rehabil, 38, pp.286~294 (2011)
  2. Lambert FE, "Descriptive analysis of implant and prosthodontic survival rates with fixed implant-supported rehabilitations in the edentulous maxilla", J Periodontol, 80, pp.1220~1230 (2009)
  3. Renvert S, "Periodontitis as a potential risk factor for peri-implantitis", J Clin Periodontol, 36(10), pp.9~14 (2009)
  4. Mombelli A, "The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants", Oral Microbiol Immunol, 2, pp.145~151 (1987)
  5. Zitzmann NU, "Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases", J Clin Periodontol, 35(8), pp.286~291 (2008)
  6. Lindhe J, "Group D of European Workshop on Periodontology. Peri-implant diseases: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology", J Clin Periodontol, 35(8), pp.282~285 (2008)
  7. Berglundh T, "A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years", J Clin Periodontol, 29(3), pp.197~212 (2002)
  8. Alcoforado GA, "Microbial aspects of failing osseointegrated dental implants in humans", J Parodontol, 10, pp.11~18 (1991)
  9. Leonhardt A, "Microbial findings at failing implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 10, pp.339~345 (1999)
  10. Schwarz F, "Influence of different treatment approaches on non-submerged and submerged healing of ligature induced peri-implantitis lesions: an experimental study in dogs", J Clin Periodontol, 33, pp.584~595 (2006)
  11. Schwarz F, "Healing of intrabony peri-implantitis defects following application of a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (Ostim) or a bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) in combination with a collagen membrane (Bio-Gide). A case series", J Clin Periodontol, 33, pp.491~499 (2006)
  12. Sculean A, "Anti-infective therapy with an Er:YAG laser: influence on peri-implant healing", Expert Rev Med Devices, 2, pp.267~276 (2005)
  13. Schou S, "Autogenous bone graft and ePTFE membrane in the treatment of peri-implantitis. II. Stereologic and histologic observations in cynomolgus monkeys", Clin Oral Implants Res, 14, pp.404~411 (2003)
  14. Schou S, "Implant surface preparation in the surgical treatment of experimental peri-implantitis with autogenous bone graft and ePTFE membrane in cynomolgus monkeys", Clin Oral Implants Res, 14, pp.412~422 (2003)
  15. Persson LG, "Resolution of peri-implantitis following treatment. An experimental study in the dog", Clin Oral Implants Res, 10, pp.195~203 (1999)
  16. Persson LG, "Re-osseointegration after treatment of peri-implantitis at different implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog", Clin Oral Implants Res, 12, pp.595~603 (2001)
  17. Alhag M, "Re-osseointegration on rough implant surfaces previously coated with bacterial biofilm: an experimental study in the dog", Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, pp.182~187 (2008)
  18. Parlar A, "Effects of decontamination and implant surface characteristics on re-osseointegration following treatment of peri-implantitis", Clin Oral Implants Res, 20, pp.391~399 (2009)
  19. Kolonidis SG, "Osseointegration on implant surfaces previously contaminated with plaque. An experimental study in the dog", Clin Oral Implants Res, 14, pp.373~380 (2003)
  20. Schou S, "Ligature-induced marginal inflammation around osseointegrated implants and ankylosed teeth: stereologic and histologic observations in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis)", J Periodontol, 64, pp.529~537 (1993)
  21. Heitz-Mayfield LJ, "Comparative biology of chronic and aggressive periodontitis vs. peri-implantitis", Periodontol 2000, 53, pp.167~181 (2010)
  22. Grunder U, "Treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis using guided tissue regeneration: a clinical and histologic study in the beagle dog", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 8, pp.282~293 (1993)
  23. Jovanovic SA, "The regenerative potential of plaque-induced peri-implant bone defects treated by a submerged membrane technique: an experimental study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 8, pp.13~18 (1993)
  24. Mohamed S, "Effect of surface contamination on osseointegration of dental implants surrounded by circumferential bone defects", Clin Oral Implants Res, 21, pp.513~519 (2010)
  25. Renvert S, "Mechanical non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a double-blind randomized longitudinal clinical study. I: clinical results", J Clin Periodontol, 36, pp.604~609 (2009)
  26. Persson LG, "Osseintegration following treatment of peri-implantitis and replacement of implant components. An experimental study in the dog", J Clin Periodontol, 28, pp.258~263 (2001)
  27. Albouy JP, "Implant surface characteristics influence the outcome of treatment of peri-implantitis: an experimental study in dogs", J Clin Periodontol, 38, pp.58~64 (2011)
  28. Persson GR, "Mechanical non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a single-blinded randomized longitudinal clinical study. II. Microbiological results", J Clin Periodontol, 37, pp.563~573 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)