Proximity of the mandibular molar root apex from the buccal bone surface: a cone-beam computed tomographic study
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the proximity of the mandibular molar apex to the buccal bone surface in order to provide anatomic information for apical surgery. Materials and Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 127 mandibular first molars and 153 mandibular second molars were analyzed from 160 patients’ records. The distance was measured from the buccal bone surface to the root apex and the apical 3.0 mm on the cross-sectional view of CBCT. Results: The second molar apex and apical 3 mm were located significantly deeper relative to the buccal bone surface compared with the first molar (p < 0.01). For the mandibular second molars, the distance from the buccal bone surface to the root apex was significantly shorter in patients over 70 years of age (p < 0.05). Furthermore, this distance was significantly shorter when the first molar was missing compared to nonmissing cases (p < 0.05). For the mandibular first molars, the distance to the distal root apex of one distal-rooted tooth was significantly greater than the distance to the disto-buccal root apex (p < 0.01). In mandibular second molar, the distance to the apex of C-shaped roots was significantly greater than the distance to the mesial root apex of non-C-shaped roots (p < 0.01). Conclusions: For apical surgery in mandibular molars, the distance from the buccal bone surface to the apex and apical 3 mm is significantly affected by the location, patient age, an adjacent missing anterior tooth, and root configuration.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the proximity of the mandibular molar apex to the buccal bone surface in order to provide anatomic information for apical surgery. Materials and Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 127 mandibular first molars and 153 mandibular second molars were analyzed from 160 patients’ records. The distance was measured from the buccal bone surface to the root apex and the apical 3.0 mm on the cross-sectional view of CBCT. Results: The second molar apex and apical 3 mm were located significantly deeper relative to the buccal bone surface compared with the first molar (p < 0.01). For the mandibular second molars, the distance from the buccal bone surface to the root apex was significantly shorter in patients over 70 years of age (p < 0.05). Furthermore, this distance was significantly shorter when the first molar was missing compared to nonmissing cases (p < 0.05). For the mandibular first molars, the distance to the distal root apex of one distal-rooted tooth was significantly greater than the distance to the disto-buccal root apex (p < 0.01). In mandibular second molar, the distance to the apex of C-shaped roots was significantly greater than the distance to the mesial root apex of non-C-shaped roots (p < 0.01). Conclusions: For apical surgery in mandibular molars, the distance from the buccal bone surface to the apex and apical 3 mm is significantly affected by the location, patient age, an adjacent missing anterior tooth, and root configuration.
참고문헌 (23)
- Ingle JI, "Ingle's endodontics", pp.705~706 (2008), BC Decker Inc
- Frankle KT, "Anatomical study of the position of the mesial roots of mandibular molars", J Endod, 16, pp.480~485 (1990)
- Jin GC, "Buccal bone plate thickness of the Asian people", J Endod, 31, pp.430~434 (2005)
- Kratchman S., "Intentional replantation", Dent Clin North Am, 41, pp.603~617 (1997)
- Patel S, "The use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics", Int Endod J, 42, pp.755~756 (2009)
- Rigolone M, "Vestibular surgical access to the palatine root of the superior first molar: ‘low-dose cone-beam’ CT analysis of the pathway and its anatomic variations", J Endod, 29, pp.773~775 (2003)
- Blattner TC, "Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography as a modality to accurately identify the presence of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first and second molars:a pilot study", J Endod, 36, pp.867~870 (2010)
- Siqueira JF Jr., "Aetiology of root canal treatment failure:why well-treated teeth can fail", Int Endod J, 34, pp.1~10 (2001)
- Johnson BR, "Cohen's pathways of the pulp" (2016), Elsevier Inc
- Kim, S., "Color atlas of microsurgery in endodontics" (2000), Saunders
- Khoury F, "The bony lid approach for the apical root resection of lower molars", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 16, pp.166~170 (1987)
- Lasaridis N, "Bony lid approach for apicoectomy of mandibular molars", Aust Dent J, 36, pp.366~368 (1991)
- Timock AM, "Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 140, pp.734~744 (2011)
- De Deus QD., "Frequency, location, and direction of the lateral, secondary, and accessory canals", J Endod, 1, pp.361~366 (1975)
- Seltzer S, "Biologic aspects of endodontics, I. Histologic observations of the anatomy and morphology of root apices and surrounding structures", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 22, pp.375~385 (1966)
- Wada M, "Clinical study of refractory apical periodontitis treated by apicoectomy. Part 1. root canal morphology of resected apex", Int Endod J, 31, pp.53~56 (1998)
- Kim S., "Principles of endodontic microsurgery", Dent Clin North Am, 41, pp.481~497 (1997)
- Noyes HJ., "Mesial drift", Angle Orthod, 11, pp.199~200 (1941)
- Schropp L, "Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study", Int J Periodontics Restor Dent, 23, pp.313~323 (2003)
- Kingsmill VJ, "Variation in the apparent density of human mandibular bone with age and dental status", J Anat, 192, pp.233~244 (1998)
- Kingsmill VJ., "Post-extraction remodeling of the adult mandible", Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 10, pp.384~404 (1999)
- Khosla S, "Relationship of serum sex steroid levels to longitudinal changes in bone density in young versus elderly men", J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 86, pp.3556~3561 (2001)
- Clarke BL, "Physiology of bone loss", Radiol Clin North Am, 48, pp.483~495 (2010)