Comparing pain relief and functional improvement between methylprednisolone and dexamethasone lumbosacral transforaminal epidural steroid injections: a self-controlled study
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Previous studies have shown varying results between lumbosacral transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) performed with particulate ver-sus non-particulate corticosteroids. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in pain relief and functional improvement between particulate and non-particulate lumbosacral TFESIs in patients who had undergone both injections, se-quentially.Methods: This was a self-controlled, retrospective study of 20 patients who under-went both a methylprednisolone and a dexamethasone TFESI to the same vertebral level and side. Primary outcomes included pain relief according to the visual ana-logue scale (VAS) and functional improvement determined by a yes/no answer to questions regarding mobility and the activities of daily living. Post-injection data was recorded at 2, 3, and 6 months. Results: A decrease in VAS scores of –3.4 ± 3.0 (mean ± standard deviation), –3.1 ± 3.1, and –2.8 ± 3.4 was seen for the methylprednisolone group at 2, 3, and 6 months, respectively. Similar decreases of –3.9 ± 3.5, –3.4 ± 2.8, and –2.3 ± 3.4 were seen in the dexamethasone group. There was no significant difference in pain relief at any point between the two medications. The percentage of subjects who reported improved function at 2, 3, and 6 months was 65%, 51%, and 41%, respec-tively, for the methylprednisolone group and 75%, 53%, and 42% for the dexameth-asone group. Conclusions: These findings support the use of non-particulate corticosteroids for lumbosacral TFESIs in the context of documented safety concerns with particulate corticosteroids.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have shown varying results between lumbosacral transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) performed with particulate ver-sus non-particulate corticosteroids. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in pain relief and functional improvement between particulate and non-particulate lumbosacral TFESIs in patients who had undergone both injections, se-quentially.Methods: This was a self-controlled, retrospective study of 20 patients who under-went both a methylprednisolone and a dexamethasone TFESI to the same vertebral level and side. Primary outcomes included pain relief according to the visual ana-logue scale (VAS) and functional improvement determined by a yes/no answer to questions regarding mobility and the activities of daily living. Post-injection data was recorded at 2, 3, and 6 months. Results: A decrease in VAS scores of –3.4 ± 3.0 (mean ± standard deviation), –3.1 ± 3.1, and –2.8 ± 3.4 was seen for the methylprednisolone group at 2, 3, and 6 months, respectively. Similar decreases of –3.9 ± 3.5, –3.4 ± 2.8, and –2.3 ± 3.4 were seen in the dexamethasone group. There was no significant difference in pain relief at any point between the two medications. The percentage of subjects who reported improved function at 2, 3, and 6 months was 65%, 51%, and 41%, respec-tively, for the methylprednisolone group and 75%, 53%, and 42% for the dexameth-asone group. Conclusions: These findings support the use of non-particulate corticosteroids for lumbosacral TFESIs in the context of documented safety concerns with particulate corticosteroids.
참고문헌 (26)
- Buenaventura RM, "Systematic review of therapeutic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections", Pain Physician, 12, pp.233~251 (2009)
- Ghahreman A, "The efficacy of transforaminal injection of steroids for the treatment of lumbar radicular pain", Pain Med, 11, pp.1149~1168 (2010)
- Kaufmann TJ, "Clinical effectiveness of single lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections", Pain Med, 14, pp.1126~1133 (2013)
- MacVicar J, "The effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal injection of steroids : a comprehensive review with systematic analysis of the published data", Pain Med, 14, pp.14~28 (2013)
- Roberts ST, "Efficacy of lumbosacral transforaminal epidural steroid injections : a systematic review", PM R, 1, pp.657~668 (2009)
- Vad VB, "Transforaminal epidural steroid injections in lumbosacral radiculopathy : a prospective randomized study", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 27, pp.11~16 (2002)
- Dietrich TJ, "Particulate versus non-particulate steroids for lumbar transforaminal or interlaminar epidural steroid injections : an update", Skeletal Radiol, 44, pp.149~155 (2015)
- Hodler J, "Must we discontinue selective cervical nerve root blocks? Report of two cases and review of the literature", Eur Spine J, 22(Suppl 3), pp.S466~470 (2013)
- Houten JK, "Paraplegia after lumbosacral nerve root block : report of three cases", Spine J, 2, pp.70~75 (2002)
- Huntoon MA, "Paralysis after transforaminal epidural injection and previous spinal surgery", Reg Anesth Pain Med, 29, pp.494~495 (2004)
- Kennedy DJ, "Paraplegia following image-guided transforaminal lumbar spine epidural steroid injection : two case reports", Pain Med, 10, pp.1389~1394 (2009)
- Ludwig MA, "Spinal cord infarction following cervical transforaminal epidural injection : a case report", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 30, pp.E266~268 (2005)
- Popescu A, "Stroke following epidural injections--case report and review of literature", J Neuroimaging, 23, pp.118~121 (2013)
- Somayaji HS, "Spinal cord infarction following therapeutic computed tomographyguided left L2 nerve root injection", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 30, pp.E106~108 (2005)
- Wybier M, "Paraplegia complicating selective steroid injections of the lumbar spine. Report of five cases and review of the literature", Eur Radiol, 20, pp.181~189 (2010)
- Derby R, "Size and aggregation of corticosteroids used for epidural injections", Pain Med, 9, pp.227~234 (2008)
- MacMahon PJ, "Injectable corticosteroid preparations : an embolic risk assessment by static and dynamic microscopic analysis", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 32, pp.1830~1835 (2011)
- "Kenalog®-10 injection (triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension, USP)" (2011)[URL]
- Shah RV, "Paraplegia following thoracic and lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections: how relevant are particulate steroids?", Pain Pract, 14, pp.297~300 (2014)
- Dreyfuss P, "Comparative effectiveness of cervical transforaminal injections with particulate and nonparticulate corticosteroid preparations for cervical radicular pain", Pain Med, 7, pp.237~242 (2006)
- Lee JW, "Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the management of cervical radiculopathy : a comparative study of particulate versus non-particulate steroids", Skeletal Radiol, 38, pp.1077~1082 (2009)
- Park CH, "Comparison of the effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal epidural injection with particulate and nonparticulate corticosteroids in lumbar radiating pain", Pain Med, 11, pp.1654~1658 (2010)
- Berkwits L, "Atlas of image-guided spinal procedures", pp.93~103 (2012), Elsevier Saunders
- Denis I, "Randomized double-blind controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal epidural injections of particulate and nonparticulate corticosteroids for lumbosacral radicular pain", Pain Med, 16, pp.1697~1708 (2015)
- Kennedy DJ, "Comparative effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections with particulate versus nonparticulate corticosteroids for lumbar radicular pain due to intervertebral disc herniation : a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial", Pain Med, 15, pp.548~555 (2014)
- El-Yahchouchi C, "The noninferiority of the nonparticulate steroid dexamethasone vs the particulate steroids betamethasone and triamcinolone in lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections", Pain Med, 14, pp.1650~1657 (2013)
