Alveolar ridge preservation with a collagen material: a randomized controlled trial
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Resorption of the alveolar bone is an unavoidable consequence of tooth extraction when appropriate alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) measures are not taken. The objective of this trial was to test the hypothesis that dimensional changes in the alveolar bone after tooth extraction would be reduced by inserting an equine collagen membrane and a collagen cone to fill and seal the alveolus (as ARP), in comparison to extraction with untreated alveoli. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 31 patients were directly treated with the collagen material after extraction of a tooth from the maxilla (the ARP group). Twenty-nine patients served as the control group. After extraction, no further treatment (i.e., no socket preservation measures) was performed in the control group. Changes in the alveolar process immediately after extraction and after an 8 (±1)-week healing period were evaluated 3-dimensionally. Blinded analyses were performed after superimposing the data from the digitalized impressions and surfaces generated by cone-beam computed tomography. Results: Both the ARP and control groups showed a reduction of bone in the alveolar area after tooth extraction. However, significantly less bone resorption was detected in the clinically relevant buccal region in the ARP group. The median bone reduction was 1.18 mm in the ARP group and 5.06 mm in the control group (P=0.03). Conclusions: The proposed hypothesis that inserting a combination material comprising a collagen cone and membrane would lead to a difference in alveolar bone preservation can be accepted for the clinically relevant buccal distance. In this area, implantation of the collagen material led to significantly less alveolar bone resorption. German Clinical Trials Register at www.drks.de, DRKS00004769.
Abstract
Purpose: Resorption of the alveolar bone is an unavoidable consequence of tooth extraction when appropriate alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) measures are not taken. The objective of this trial was to test the hypothesis that dimensional changes in the alveolar bone after tooth extraction would be reduced by inserting an equine collagen membrane and a collagen cone to fill and seal the alveolus (as ARP), in comparison to extraction with untreated alveoli. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 31 patients were directly treated with the collagen material after extraction of a tooth from the maxilla (the ARP group). Twenty-nine patients served as the control group. After extraction, no further treatment (i.e., no socket preservation measures) was performed in the control group. Changes in the alveolar process immediately after extraction and after an 8 (±1)-week healing period were evaluated 3-dimensionally. Blinded analyses were performed after superimposing the data from the digitalized impressions and surfaces generated by cone-beam computed tomography. Results: Both the ARP and control groups showed a reduction of bone in the alveolar area after tooth extraction. However, significantly less bone resorption was detected in the clinically relevant buccal region in the ARP group. The median bone reduction was 1.18 mm in the ARP group and 5.06 mm in the control group (P=0.03). Conclusions: The proposed hypothesis that inserting a combination material comprising a collagen cone and membrane would lead to a difference in alveolar bone preservation can be accepted for the clinically relevant buccal distance. In this area, implantation of the collagen material led to significantly less alveolar bone resorption. German Clinical Trials Register at www.drks.de, DRKS00004769.
참고문헌 (25)
- Tan WL, "A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23(Suppl 5), pp.1~21 (2012)
- Chappuis V, "Ridge alterations post-extraction in the esthetic zone: a 3D analysis with CBCT", J Dent Res, 92, pp.195S~201S (2013)
- Schmidlin PR, "Prevention of alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction--a review", Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, 114, pp.328~336 (2004)
- Iyer S, "Part II. Minimizing alveolar bone loss during and after extractions. Protocol and techniques for alveolar bone preservation", Alpha Omegan, 107, pp.14~25 (2014)
- Mardas N, "Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial", Clin Oral Implants Res, 21, pp.688~698 (2010)
- Trombelli L, "Modeling and remodeling of human extraction sockets", J Clin Periodontol, 35, pp.630~639 (2008)
- Sanz I, "Surgical protocols for early implant placement in post-extraction sockets: a systematic review", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23(Suppl 5), pp.67~79 (2012)
- Ten Heggeler JM, "Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review", Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, pp.779~788 (2011)
- Misch CE, "A modified socket seal surgery with composite graft approach", J Oral Implantol, 25, pp.244~250 (1999)
- Crespi R, "Bone recontouring in fresh sockets with buccal bone loss: a cone beam computed tomography study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 29, pp.863~868 (2014)
- Vittorini Orgeas G, "Surgical techniques for alveolar socket preservation: a systematic review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 28, pp.1049~1061 (2013)
- Pagni G, "Postextraction alveolar ridge preservation: biological basis and treatments", Int J Dent, 2012, pp.151030~ (2012)
- Lambert F, "A methodological approach to assessing alveolar ridge preservation procedures in humans: hard tissue profile", J Clin Periodontol, 39, pp.887~894 (2012)
- Annen BM, "Ridge preservation after tooth extraction using collagen cones with integrated membranes: a case series and volumetric analysis", Implantologie, 22, pp.341~351 (2014)
- Kunert-Keil C, "Socket augmentation using a commercial collagen-based product--an animal study in pigs", Mater Sci Eng C, 46, pp.177~183 (2015)
- Moher D, "The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials", BMC Med Res Methodol, 1, pp.2~ (2001)
- Schulz KF, "CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials", J Clin Epidemiol, 63, pp.834~840 (2010)
- Moher D, "CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials", J Clin Epidemiol, 63, pp.e1~e37 (2010)
- Fickl S, "Dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge contour after different socket preservation techniques", J Clin Periodontol, 35, pp.906~913 (2008)
- Erica Dorigatti de Avila, "Alveolar ridge augmentation with the perforated and nonperforated bone grafts", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 44(1), pp.33~38 (2014), 대한치주과학회
- Leung CC, "Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.S109~S119 (2010)
- Schulze R, "Artefacts in CBCT: a review", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 40, pp.265~273 (2011)
- Seibert JS, "Periodontal considerations in preparation for fixed and removable prosthodontics", Dent Clin North Am, 31, pp.529~555 (1987)
- De Buitrago JG, "Quality assessment of systematic reviews on alveolar ridge preservation", J Am Dent Assoc, 144, pp.1349~1357 (2013)
- Hämmerle CH, "Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23(Suppl 5), pp.80~82 (2012)