본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Maneuvering simulation of an X-plane submarine using computational fluid dynamics

1

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류조선공학

초록

X-plane submarines show better maneuverability as they have much longer span of control plane than that of cross plane submarines. In this study, captive model tests were conducted to evaluate the maneuverability of an X-plane submarine using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and a mathematical maneuvering model. For CFD analysis, SNUFOAM, CFD software specialized in naval hydrodynamics based on the open-source toolkit, OpenFOAM, was applied. A generic submarine Joubert BB2 was selected as a test model, which was modified by Maritime Research Institute Netherlands (MARIN). Captive model tests including propeller open water, resistance, self-propulsion, static drift, horizontal planar motion mechanism and vertical planar motion mechanism tests were carried out to obtain maneuvering coefficients of the submarine. Maneuvering simulations for turning circle tests were performed using the maneuvering coefficients obtained from the captive model tests. The simulated trajectory showed good agreement with that of free running model tests. From the results, it was proved that CFD simulations can be applicable to obtain reliable maneuvering coefficients for X-plane submarines.

Abstract

X-plane submarines show better maneuverability as they have much longer span of control plane than that of cross plane submarines. In this study, captive model tests were conducted to evaluate the maneuverability of an X-plane submarine using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and a mathematical maneuvering model. For CFD analysis, SNUFOAM, CFD software specialized in naval hydrodynamics based on the open-source toolkit, OpenFOAM, was applied. A generic submarine Joubert BB2 was selected as a test model, which was modified by Maritime Research Institute Netherlands (MARIN). Captive model tests including propeller open water, resistance, self-propulsion, static drift, horizontal planar motion mechanism and vertical planar motion mechanism tests were carried out to obtain maneuvering coefficients of the submarine. Maneuvering simulations for turning circle tests were performed using the maneuvering coefficients obtained from the captive model tests. The simulated trajectory showed good agreement with that of free running model tests. From the results, it was proved that CFD simulations can be applicable to obtain reliable maneuvering coefficients for X-plane submarines.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Bettle, M. C., "Validating design methods for sizing submarine Tailfins", Proceedings of Warship 2014. Naval Submarines & UUV’s, Bath (2014)
  2. Carrica, P. M., "Computations of self-propulsion free to sink and trim and of motions in head waves of the KRISO Container Ship(KCS)model", Appl. Ocean Res, 33(4), pp.309~320 (2011)
  3. Castro, A. M., "Full scale self-propulsion computations using discretized propeller for the KRISO container ship KCS", Comput. Fluids, 51(1), pp.35~47 (2011)
  4. Celik, I., "Numerical experiments on application of Richardson extrapolation with non-uniform grids", J. Fluid Eng, 119(3), pp.584~590 (1997)
  5. Chen, L. F., "Numerical investigation of waveestructure interaction using OpenFOAM", Ocean Eng, 88, pp.91~109 (2014)
  6. Resistance for DARPA Suboff as represented by model 5470, "Crook, B.", David Taylor Research Center, ~, pp.DTRC Report No. SHD-1298-07 (1990)
  7. Dubbioso, G., "CFD analysis of turning abilities of a submarine model", Ocean Eng, 129, pp.459~479 (2017)
  8. Method of Performing Captive-Model Experiments to Predict the Stability and Control Characteristics of Submarines, "Feldman, J.", Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center, ~, pp.CRDKNSWC Report No. HD-0393-25 (1995)
  9. Feng, D., "Large eddy simulation of DARPA SUBOFF for Re=2.65 x 107", J. Coast Res, (73), pp.687~691 (2015)
  10. Gao, T., "A time-efficient CFD approach for hydrodynamic coefficient determination and model simplification of submarine", Ocean. Eng, 154, pp.16~26 (2018)
  11. The DTMB Planar-Motion-Mechanism System, "Gertler, M.", Naval Ship Research and Development Center, ~, pp.NSRDE Report No. 2523 (1967)
  12. Hrvoje Jasak, "CFD validation and grid sensitivity studies of full scale ship self propulsion", International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 11(1), pp.33~43 (2019), 대한조선학회[DOI]
  13. Kim, H., "Six-DOF simulations of an underwater vehicle undergoing straight line and steady turning manoeuvres", Ocean Eng, 150, pp.102~112 (2018)
  14. Lee, S. K., "Evaluation of the added mass for a spheroid-type UUV by VPMM test", Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference (2009)
  15. Martin, J. E., "Submarine maneuvers using direct overset simulation of appendages and propeller and coupled CFD", potential flow propeller solver, 2015, pp.59(1), 31~48
  16. Nouri, N. M., "CFD modeling of wing and body of an AUV for estimation of hydrodynamic coefficients", J. Appl. Fluid Mech, 9(6), pp.2717~2729 (2016)
  17. Overpelt, B., "Free running maneuvering model tests on a modern generic SSK class submarine(BB2)", Proceedings of Pacific International Maritime Conference, Sydney (2015)
  18. Pan, Y. C., "Numerical prediction of submarine hydrodynamic coefficients using CFD simulation", J. Hydrodyn, 24(6), pp.840~847 (2012)
  19. 박종용, "Experimental study on hydrodynamic coefficients for high-incidence-angle maneuver of a submarine", International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 9(1), pp.100~113 (2017), 대한조선학회
  20. Phillips, A. B., "Virtual planar motion mechanism tests of the autonomous underwater vehicle autosub", Proceedings of STG Conference (2007)
  21. Pontarelli, M., "Dynamic instabilities in propeller crashback", Proceeding of the 5th International Symposium on Marine Propulsors (2017)
  22. Renilson, M., "Submarine Hydrodynamics", pp.131~145 (2015), Springer
  23. Sezen, S., "Investigation of self-propulsion of DARPA Suboff by RANS method", Ocean Eng, 150, pp.258~271 (2018)
  24. SHWG collaborative exercise: BB2, "Toxopeus, S. L.", Submarine Hydrodynamic Working Group, ~, pp.Tech. Report 29347-1-RD (2017)
  25. Tyagi, A., "Calculation of transverse hydrodynamic coefficients using computational fluid dynamic approach", Ocean Eng, 33(5-6), pp.798~809 (2006)
  26. Watt, G. D., "Modelling and simulating unsteady six degrees-of-freedom submarine rising maneuvers", Defense R&D Canada Atlantic Dartmouth, ~ (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (80건)