본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Assessment of the effect of biofilm on the ship hydrodynamic performance by performance prediction method

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류조선공학

초록

Biofouling represents an important problem in the shipping industry since it causes the increase in surface roughness. The most of ships in the current world fleet do not have good coating condition which represents an important problem due to strict rules regarding ship energy efficiency. Therefore, the importance of the control and management of the hull and propeller fouling is highlighted by the International Maritime Organization and the maintenance schedule optimization became valuable energy saving measure. For adequate implementation of this measure, the accurate prediction of the effects of biofouling on the hydrodynamic characteristics is required. Although computational fluid dynamics approach, based on the modified wall function approach, has imposed itself as one of the most promising tools for this prediction, it requires significant computational time. However, during the maintenance schedule optimization, it is important to rapidly predict the effect of biofouling on the ship hydrodynamic performance. In this paper, the effect of biofilm on the ship hydrodynamic performance is studied using the proposed performance prediction method for three merchant ships. The applicability of this method in the assessment of the effect of biofilm on the ship hydrodynamic performance is demonstrated by comparison of the obtained results using the proposed performance prediction method and computational fluid dynamics approach. The comparison has shown that the highest relative deviation is lower than 4.2% for all propulsion characteristics, lower than 1.5% for propeller rotation rate and lower than 5.2% for delivered power. Thus, a practical tool for the estimation of the effect of biofouling with lower fouling severity on the ship hydrodynamic performance is developed.

Abstract

Biofouling represents an important problem in the shipping industry since it causes the increase in surface roughness. The most of ships in the current world fleet do not have good coating condition which represents an important problem due to strict rules regarding ship energy efficiency. Therefore, the importance of the control and management of the hull and propeller fouling is highlighted by the International Maritime Organization and the maintenance schedule optimization became valuable energy saving measure. For adequate implementation of this measure, the accurate prediction of the effects of biofouling on the hydrodynamic characteristics is required. Although computational fluid dynamics approach, based on the modified wall function approach, has imposed itself as one of the most promising tools for this prediction, it requires significant computational time. However, during the maintenance schedule optimization, it is important to rapidly predict the effect of biofouling on the ship hydrodynamic performance. In this paper, the effect of biofilm on the ship hydrodynamic performance is studied using the proposed performance prediction method for three merchant ships. The applicability of this method in the assessment of the effect of biofilm on the ship hydrodynamic performance is demonstrated by comparison of the obtained results using the proposed performance prediction method and computational fluid dynamics approach. The comparison has shown that the highest relative deviation is lower than 4.2% for all propulsion characteristics, lower than 1.5% for propeller rotation rate and lower than 5.2% for delivered power. Thus, a practical tool for the estimation of the effect of biofouling with lower fouling severity on the ship hydrodynamic performance is developed.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. Andersson, J., "Review and comparison of methods to model ship hull roughness", Appl. Ocean Res, 99, pp.102119~ (2020)
  2. Bertram, V., "Practical Ship Hydrodynamics" (2011), Elsevier
  3. Castro, A. M., "Full scale self-propulsion computations using discretized propeller for the KRISO container ship KCS", Comput. Fluid, 51(1), pp.35~47 (2011)
  4. A study into the techniques needed to accurately predict skin friction using RANS solvers with validation against Froude’s historical flat plate experimental data, "Date, J. C.", ~ (1999)
  5. Demirel, Y. K., "A CFD model for the frictional resistance prediction of antifouling coatings", Ocean. Eng, 89, pp.21~31 (2014)
  6. Demirel, Y. K., "Predicting the effect of biofouling on ship resistance using CFD", Appl. Ocean Res, 62, pp.100~118 (2017)
  7. Demirel, Y. K., "Effect of barnacle fouling on ship resistance and powering", Biofouling, 33(10), pp.819~834 (2017)
  8. Demirel, Y. K., "Practical added resistance diagrams to predict fouling impact on ship performance", Ocean. Eng, 186, pp.106112~ (2019)
  9. Farkas, A., "Numerical investigation into the interaction of resistance components for a series 60 catamaran", Ocean. Eng, 146, pp.151~169 (2017)
  10. Farkas, A., "Assessment of hydrodynamic characteristics of a full-scale ship at different draughts", Ocean. Eng, 156, pp.135~152 (2018)
  11. Farkas, A., "Towards the prediction of the effect of biofilm on the ship resistance using CFD", Ocean. Eng, 167, pp.169~186 (2018)
  12. Farkas, A., "Numerical and experimental assessment of nominal wake for a bulk carrier", J. Mar. Sci. Technol, 24(4), pp.1092~1104 (2019)
  13. Farkas, A., "An investigation into the effect of hard fouling on the ship resistance using CFD", Appl. Ocean Res, 100, pp.102205~ (2020)
  14. Farkas, A., "Impact of biofilm on the resistance characteristics and nominal wake", Proc. IME M J. Eng. Marit. Environ, 234(1), pp.59~75 (2020)
  15. Farkas, A., "Impact of hard fouling on the ship performance of different ship forms", J. Mar. Sci. Eng, 8(10), pp.748~ (2020)
  16. Farkas, A., "The impact of biofouling on the propeller performance", Ocean. Eng, 219, pp.108376~ (2020)
  17. Farkas, A., "Performance prediction method for fouled surfaces", Appl. Ocean Res, 99, pp.102151~ (2020)
  18. Farkas, A., "Impact of biofilm on the ship propulsion characteristics and the speed reduction", Ocean. Eng, 199, pp.107033~ (2020)
  19. Granville, P. S., "Three indirect methods for the drag characterization of arbitrarily rough surfaces on flat plates", J. Ship Res, 31, pp.70~77 (1987)
  20. Howell, D., "A review of surface roughness in antifouling coatings illustrating the importance of cutoff length", Biofouling, 22(6), pp.401~410 (2006)
  21. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), "ISO 19030-1:2016 Ships and Marine Technology-Measurement of Changes in Hull and Propeller Performance-Part 1: General Principles", ~ (2016)
  22. ITTC, "Report of the powering performance committee", Proceedings of the 19th ITTC (1990)
  23. "ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, 1978 ITTC Performance Prediction Method", ~ (1978)
  24. ITTC Specialist Committee on Performance of Ships in Service, "Final report and recommendation to the 28th ITTC", Proceedings of 28th ITTC, II (2017)
  25. ITTC Specialist Committee on Surface Treatment, "Final report and recommendation to the 26th ITTC", Proceedings of 26th ITTC, II (2011)
  26. Kauffeldt, A., "Enhanced performance analysis and benchmarking with CFD baselines", 3rd Hull Performance & Insight Conference -HullPIC’18; Redworth (2018)
  27. Kresic, M., "Effects of propeller design-point definition on the performance of a propeller", diesel engine system with regard to in-service roughness and weather conditions, 1983, pp.91, 195~224
  28. Monty, J. P., "An assessment of the ship drag penalty arising from light calcareous tubeworm fouling", Biofouling, 32(4), pp.451~464 (2016)
  29. Murphy, E. A., "Roughness effects of diatomaceous slime fouling on turbulent boundary layer hydrodynamics", Biofouling, 34(9), pp.976~988 (2018)
  30. Ohashi, K., "Numerical study of roughness model effect including lowReynolds number model and wall function method at actual ship scale", J. Mar. Sci. Technol, pp.1~13 (2020)
  31. Oliveira, D. R., "A novel indicator for ship hull and propeller performance : examples from two shipping segments", Ocean. Eng, 205, pp.107229~ (2020)
  32. Owen, D., "Investigating the effect of biofouling on propeller characteristics using CFD", Ocean. Eng, 159, pp.505~516 (2018)
  33. Park, J., "Hull and propeller fouling decomposition and its prediction based on machine learning approach", 3rd Hull Performance & Insight Conference -HullPIC’18, 12, pp.20~26 (2018)
  34. Patel, V. C., "Perspective : flow at high Reynolds number and over rough surfacesdachilles heel of CFD", J. Fluid Eng, 120, pp.434~444 (1998)
  35. Schultz, M. P., "Frictional resistance of antifouling coating systems", J. Fluid Eng, 126(6), pp.1039~1047 (2004)
  36. Schultz, M. P., "Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering", Biofouling, 23(5), pp.331~341 (2007)
  37. Schultz, M. P., "Impact of diatomaceous biofilms on the frictional drag of fouling-release coatings", Biofouling, 31(9-10), pp.759~773 (2015)
  38. Seok, J., "A fundamental study on measurement of hull roughness", Brodogradnja : Teorija i praksa brodogradnje i pomorske tehnike, 71(1), pp.59~69 (2020)
  39. Jun Seok, "Numerical simulation of resistance performance according to surface roughness in container ships", International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 12, pp.11~19 (2020), 대한조선학회[DOI]
  40. Song, S., "An investigation into the effect of biofouling on the ship hydrodynamic characteristics using CFD", Ocean. Eng, 175, pp.122~137 (2019)
  41. Song, S., "Penalty of hull and propeller fouling on ship self-propulsion performance", Appl. Ocean Res, 94, pp.102006~ (2020)
  42. Song, S., "Propeller performance penalty of biofouling : computational fluid dynamics prediction", J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng, 142(6), pp.061901~ (2020)
  43. Song, S., "Validation of the CFD approach for modelling roughness effect on ship resistance", Ocean. Eng, 200, pp.107029~ (2020)
  44. Speranza, N., "Modelling of hull roughness", Ocean. Eng, 174, pp.31~42 (2019)
  45. Terziev, M., "Numerical investigation of the behaviour and performance of ships advancing through restricted shallow waters", J. Fluid Struct, 76, pp.185~215 (2018)
  46. Tezdogan, T., "Full-scale unsteady RANS CFD simulations of ship behaviour and performance in head seas due to slow steaming", Ocean. Eng, 97, pp.186~206 (2015)
  47. Townsin, R. L., "The ship hull fouling penalty", Biofouling, 19(S1), pp.9~15 (2003)
  48. Townsin, R. L., "Rough propeller penalties", Trans. -Soc. Nav. Archit. Mar. Eng, 93, pp.165~187 (1985)
  49. Uzun, D., "Time-dependent biofouling growth model for predicting the effects of biofouling on ship resistance and powering", Ocean. Eng, 191, pp.106432~ (2019)
  50. Uzun, D., "Does the barnacle settlement pattern affect ship resistance and powering? Appl", Ocean Res, 95, pp.102020~ (2020)
  51. van Ballegooijen, E., "An approach to monitor the propeller separately from the hull", 4th Hull Performance & Insight Conference -HullPIC’19; Gubbio (2019)
  52. Vargas, A., "A numerical approach for modelling roughness for marine applications", Proceedings of the ASME 2016 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting FEDSM2016 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (69건)