문화능력의 정의와 구성요소
The Definition and Components of Cultural Competence
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Translation and Interpreting (T/I) is closely related to culture and there is a general consensus that cultural competence is a vital ingredient in carrying out interpreting and translation activities in an effective way. However, general knowledge and definition of cultural competence often fall into the domain of encyclopedia knowledge, and so far there has been lack of related studies on identifying and defining what cultural competence really is. Thus, this study aims to explore existing research on T/I and culture, and on cultural competence with various angles. And then, based on critical examination and analysis of these existing studies, it will define what cultural competence means to Translation and Interpreting and figure out its components. In this study, cultural competence is divided into three components. The first is to acquire and understand source and target cultures, the second is to act as a mediator between the two cultures, and the third is to serve as an active agent of social and cultural activities. These three competences are related to “Knowing,” “Doing,” and “Identity” in terms of T/I and culture.
Abstract
Translation and Interpreting (T/I) is closely related to culture and there is a general consensus that cultural competence is a vital ingredient in carrying out interpreting and translation activities in an effective way. However, general knowledge and definition of cultural competence often fall into the domain of encyclopedia knowledge, and so far there has been lack of related studies on identifying and defining what cultural competence really is. Thus, this study aims to explore existing research on T/I and culture, and on cultural competence with various angles. And then, based on critical examination and analysis of these existing studies, it will define what cultural competence means to Translation and Interpreting and figure out its components. In this study, cultural competence is divided into three components. The first is to acquire and understand source and target cultures, the second is to act as a mediator between the two cultures, and the third is to serve as an active agent of social and cultural activities. These three competences are related to “Knowing,” “Doing,” and “Identity” in terms of T/I and culture.
참고문헌 (20)
- 김효중, "새로운 번역을 위한 패러다임" (2004), 푸른사상
- 정수복, "한국인의 문화적 문법" (2007), 생각의 나무
- 정호정, "제대로 된 통역·번역의 이해" (2008), 한국문화사
- 王秉欽, "20世紀中國翻譯思想史", 南開大學出版社 (2004)
- Chen, G. M., "Foundations of intercultural communication" (2005), University Press of America
- Eco Umberto, "Mouse or rat" (2003), Phoenix
- Hall, E. T., "침묵의 언어" (1959), 한길사
- Katan, D., "Culture. In: Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies", pp.70~73 (2009), Routledge
- Katan, D., "Translation as intercultural communication. in: The routledge companion to translation studies", pp.74~92 (2009), Routledge
- Munday, J., "번역학 입문: 이론과 적용" (2001), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- 남원준, "How Students Translate Culture-specific Items: An Analysis of Student Translations & Suggestions for Improvement", 번역학연구, 9(3), pp.151~175 (2008), 한국번역학회
- Neuliep, J. W., "Intercultural communication: A Contextual Approach. in: 4th edition" (2009), Sage
- Newmark, P., "Textbook of translation" (1988), Prentice Hall
- Nord, C., "번역행위의 목적성: 기능주의 번역론의 관점" (2006), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- Pym, Anthony, "Negotiating the frontier" (2000), Jerome Publishing
- Samovar, L. A., "문화 간 커뮤니케이션" (2007), 커뮤니케이션북스
- Schäffner. C., "Developing translation Competence" (2000), John Benjamins
- Venuti, L., "번역의 윤리" (2006), 열린책들
- "한국외국어대학교 초청 Basil Hatim교수 박사과정특강 파워포인트 발표자료(The discourse model in translation theory and practice. Seoul2010 dayⅤ) 및 강의록", ~ (2010)
- "언어의 창조성에 도전하는 구글"[URL]