Correlation Analysis Between Cervicovaginal Cytologic and Histopathologic Diagnoses in Cervical Squamous Cell Neoplasm
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background : The aim of this study was to confirm the usefulness of cervicovaginal smears in the screening of squamous cell neoplasms of the uterine cervix by comparative analysis between the cytologic diagnosis of cervicovaginal smears and the histologic diagnosis of tissue specimens. Methods : We selected 743 patients who had both cervicovaginal smears and histologic evaluations of the uterine cervix by colposcopic biopsy, conization, or hysterectomy at the Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center between January 2005 and December 2007. Results : The accuracy rate of cervicovaginal smears and histologic diagnoses was 93.0% (691/743) and showed a high correspondence (kappa value, 0.770, p-value, 0.000). The false-negative and false-positive rates were 0.5% (6/484) and 17.8% (46/259), respectively. The sampling and interpretation errors were identified in four and two cases of six false-negative cases and 29 and 17 cases of 46 false-positive cases, respectively. In screening high grade squamous cell neoplasms, there were no false-negative cases and only one false-positive case which resulted from sampling error. The false-negative rate of cervicovaginal smears and the false-positive rate in high-grade squamous cell neoplsams were very low. Conclusions : The cervicovaginal smear is a powerful tool for screening of cervical squamous cell neoplasms.
Abstract
Background : The aim of this study was to confirm the usefulness of cervicovaginal smears in the screening of squamous cell neoplasms of the uterine cervix by comparative analysis between the cytologic diagnosis of cervicovaginal smears and the histologic diagnosis of tissue specimens. Methods : We selected 743 patients who had both cervicovaginal smears and histologic evaluations of the uterine cervix by colposcopic biopsy, conization, or hysterectomy at the Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center between January 2005 and December 2007. Results : The accuracy rate of cervicovaginal smears and histologic diagnoses was 93.0% (691/743) and showed a high correspondence (kappa value, 0.770, p-value, 0.000). The false-negative and false-positive rates were 0.5% (6/484) and 17.8% (46/259), respectively. The sampling and interpretation errors were identified in four and two cases of six false-negative cases and 29 and 17 cases of 46 false-positive cases, respectively. In screening high grade squamous cell neoplasms, there were no false-negative cases and only one false-positive case which resulted from sampling error. The false-negative rate of cervicovaginal smears and the false-positive rate in high-grade squamous cell neoplsams were very low. Conclusions : The cervicovaginal smear is a powerful tool for screening of cervical squamous cell neoplasms.
참고문헌 (25)
- Miller AB, "Mortality from cancer of the uterus in Canada and its relationship to screening for cancer of the cervix", Int J Cancer, 17, pp.602~612 (1976)
- Evaluation of cervical cytology, "AHCPR (Agency for Health Care Policy and Research)", ~, pp.Evidence report (1999), Technology assessment. No5
- Yoo BG, "Clinical and pathological observation on the diagnosis and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III (CIN III) of the uterine cervix", Korean J Obstet Gynecol, 36, pp.366~376 (1993)
- Kim HS, "False-negative cytology in cervical smears: an evaluation on 1000 cases of squamous intraepithelial lesion and squamous cell carcinoma histologically confirmed", Korean J Gynecol Oncol Colposc, 6, pp.31~37 (1995)
- Song MK, "False negative cytology in cervical smears: an evaluation of 186 cases of squamous intraepithelial lesion and squamous cell carcinoma, hitologically confirmed", Korean J Obstet Gynecol, 44, pp.763~768 (2001)
- 장준혁, "자궁경부 세포진 검사:10년 성적에 대한 분석 (1992-2001)", Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 46(9), pp.7~7 (2003), 대한산부인과학회
- 진소영, "자궁경부 편평상피병변에서 자궁경부질도말 세포검사의 진단정확도 : 481예의 세포-조직 상관관계", 대한세포병리학회지, 19(2), pp.111~118 (2008), ��한세포병리학회
- Gay JD, "False-negative results in cervical cytologic studies", Acta Cytol, 29, pp.1043~1046 (1985)
- Zahniser DJ, "CYTYC Corporation", Acta Cytol, 40, pp.37~44 (1996)
- Sherman ME, "PAPNET analysis of reportedly negative smears preceding the diagnosis of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or carcinoma", Mod Pathol, 7, pp.578~581 (1994)
- Solomon D, "The bethesda system for reporting cervical cytology; definitions, criterias, and explanatory notes" (2004), Springer science
- National cancer screening project, , National cancer information center, ~ (2008)
- Husain OA, "Quality control in cervical cytology", J Clin Pathol, 27, pp.935~944 (1974)
- Joseph MG, "Cyto-histological correlates in a colposcopic clinic: a 1-year prospective study", Diagn Cytopathol, 7, pp.477~481 (1991)
- DiBonito L, "Cervical cytopathology. An evaluation of its accuracy based on cytohistologic comparison", Cancer, 72, pp.3002~3006 (1993)
- Cho SH, "Accuracy of cervical pap smear", Korean J Gynecol Oncol Colposc, 10, pp.156~163 (1999)
- Noh HT, "The efficacy of cervicography combined with pap smear in cervical cancer screening", Korean J Gynecol Oncol Colposc, 10, pp.13~23 (1999)
- Townsend DE, "Abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Evaluation by colposcopy, biopsies, and endocervical curettage", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 108, pp.429~434 (1970)
- Morell ND, "Falsenegative cytology rates in patients in whom invasive cervical cancer subsequently developed", Obstet Gynecol, 60, pp.41~45 (1982)
- Dvorak KA, "Histology correlation with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) cytology diagnoses:an argument to ensure ASCUS follow-up that is as aggressive as that for LSIL", Diagn Cytopathol, 21, pp.292~295 (1999)
- Grenko RT, "Variance in the interpretation of cervical biopsy specimens obtained for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance", Am J Clin Pathol, 114, pp.735~740 (2000)
- Jones BA, "Quality management in gynecologic cytology using interlaboratory comparison", Arch Pathol Lab Med, 124, pp.672~681 (2000)
- Kirschner B, "Comparison of conventional papanicolaou smear and surepath liquid-based cytology in the copenhagen population screening programme for cervical cancer", Cytopathology, 17, pp.187~194 (2006)
- Williams AR, "Liquid-based cytology and conventional smears compared over two 12-month periods", Cytopathology, 17, pp.82~85 (2006)
- Syrjanen K, "Natural history of cervical human papillomavirus lesions does not substantiate the biologic relevance of the Bethesda System", Obstet Gynecol, 79, pp.675~682 (1992)