본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Interobserver Variability for Diagnosing Pulmonary Carcinoid Tumor

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류병리학

초록

Background : Although the grade of pulmonary carcinoid tumor is routinely reported in pathology practice, there is a paucity of data on the level of agreement between pathologists. Methods : Data for 30 cases of surgically resected pulmonary tumors diagnosed as carcinoid tumors (19 typical carcinoids [TCs] and 11 atypical carcinoids [ACs]) were retrieved from four university hospitals. These cases were independently evaluated by five pathologists and were classified according to the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Agreement was regarded as “nanimous”if all five pathologists agreed, and as a “ajority”if four agreed. The kappa statistic was calculated to measure the degree of agreement between pathologists. Results : Unanimous agreement was achieved for 50.0% and a majority agreement for 83.3% of the 30 cases. The range of the kappa values extended from 0.37 to 0.89. After a consensus meeting, there was disagreement between the original diagnosis by each institute and the consensus diagnosis by the five pathologists for 40.0% of the 30 cases. Based on the consensus diagnosis, the agreement was greater for TCs than that for ACs. Conclusions : Discriminating carcinoid tumors is subject to interobserver variability. This study indicates that there is a need for more careful standardization and application of diagnostic criteria for making the diagnosis of pulmonary carcinoid tumor.

Abstract

Background : Although the grade of pulmonary carcinoid tumor is routinely reported in pathology practice, there is a paucity of data on the level of agreement between pathologists. Methods : Data for 30 cases of surgically resected pulmonary tumors diagnosed as carcinoid tumors (19 typical carcinoids [TCs] and 11 atypical carcinoids [ACs]) were retrieved from four university hospitals. These cases were independently evaluated by five pathologists and were classified according to the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Agreement was regarded as “nanimous”if all five pathologists agreed, and as a “ajority”if four agreed. The kappa statistic was calculated to measure the degree of agreement between pathologists. Results : Unanimous agreement was achieved for 50.0% and a majority agreement for 83.3% of the 30 cases. The range of the kappa values extended from 0.37 to 0.89. After a consensus meeting, there was disagreement between the original diagnosis by each institute and the consensus diagnosis by the five pathologists for 40.0% of the 30 cases. Based on the consensus diagnosis, the agreement was greater for TCs than that for ACs. Conclusions : Discriminating carcinoid tumors is subject to interobserver variability. This study indicates that there is a need for more careful standardization and application of diagnostic criteria for making the diagnosis of pulmonary carcinoid tumor.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Cardillo G, "Bronchial carcinoid tumors:nodal status and long-term survival after resection", Ann Thorac Surg, 77, pp.1781~1785 (2004)
  2. Travis WD, "World Health Organization international histological classification of tumours: histological typing of lung and pleural tumours. 3rd ed" (1999), Springer
  3. Travis WD, "World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart" (2004), IARC press
  4. Travis WD, "Reproducibility of neuroendocrine lung tumor classification", Hum Pathol, 29, pp.272~279 (1998)
  5. Mountain CF, "Revisions in the international system for staging lung cancer", Chest, 111, pp.1710~1717 (1997)
  6. Travis WD, "Survival analysis of 200 pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors with clarification of criteria for atypical carcinoid and its separation from typical carcinoid", Am J Surg Pathol, 22, pp.934~944 (1998)
  7. Baak JP, "Mitosis counting in tumors", Hum Pathol, 21, pp.683~685 (1990)
  8. Shibata K, "Mitosis-specific histone H3 phosphorylation in vitro in nucleosome structures", Eur J Biochem, 192, pp.87~93 (1990)
  9. Tapia C, "Two mitosis-specific antibodies,MPM-2 and phospho-histone H3(Ser28),allow rapid and precise determination of mitotic activity", Am J Surg Pathol, 30, pp.83~89 (2006)
  10. Beasley MB, "Pulmonary atypical carcinoid:predictors of survival in 106 cases", Hum Pathol, 31, pp.1255~1265 (2000)
  11. García-Yuste M, "Typical and atypical carcinoid tumours:analysis of the experience of the Spanish Multi-centric Study of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the Lung", Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 31, pp.192~197 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

Interobserver Variability in Diagnosing High-Grade Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung and Comparing It with the Morphometric Analysis김완섭, 노미숙, 서병성, 하승연, 한정호대한병리학회 · Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine2012 · 제46권 제1호Morphologic Analysis of Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors강명희, 노미숙, 안정석, 이승숙, 하승연, 하창원, 한정호대한병리학회 · Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine2013 · 제47권 제1호Proposal for a Standardized Pathology Report of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Prognostic Significance of Pathological Parameters강대영, 강윤경, 김경미, 김미정, 김우호, 김윤화, 김준미, 김현기, 손진희, 정은선, 조미연, 진소영, 최은희, 최준혁대한병리학회 · Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine2013 · 제47권 제3호Clinicopathological Analysis of 21 Thymic Neuroendocrine Tumors김진국, 안수민, 이재준, 하상윤, 한정호대한병리학회 · Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine2012 · 제46권 제3호Current Trends of the Incidence and Pathological Diagnosis of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs) in Korea 2000-2009: Multicenter Study주미, 강대영, 강미선, 강윤경, 구미진, 국명철, 김경미, 김미정, 김수진, 김우호, 김윤화, 김준미, 김현기, 김희경, 문우성, 박도윤, 박문일, 배한익, 손진희, 윤선오, 이재혁, 장세진, 장희경, 정은선, 조미연, 조창호, 진소영, 최준혁대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2012 · 제44권 제3호위장관계 신경내분비성 종양의 임상 및 병리학적 특성;65 증례 분석김애리, 김인선, 김한겸, 김현철, 신봉경, 안정석, 이현주, 최정우대한병리학회 · Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine2007 · 제41권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)