본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Pathologic Factors Associated with Prognosis after Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II/III Microsatellite-Unstable Colorectal Cancers

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류병리학

초록

Background: Although there are controversies regarding the benefit of fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC), the pathologic features affecting postchemotherapeutic prognosis in these patients have not been fully identified yet. Methods: A total of 26 histopathologic and immunohistochemical factors were comprehensively evaluated in 125 stage II or III MSI-H CRC patients who underwent curative resection followed by fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. We statistically analyzed the associations of these factors with disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Using a Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test, we determined that ulceroinfiltrative gross type (p=.003), pT4 (p<.001), pN2 (p=.002), perineural invasion (p=.001), absence of peritumoral lymphoid reaction (p=.041), signet ring cell component (p=.006), and cribriform comedo component (p=.004) were significantly associated with worse DFS in patients receiving oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (n=45). By contrast, pT4 (p<.001) and tumor budding-positivity (p=.032) were significant predictors of poor survival in patients receiving non-oxaliplatin–based adjuvant chemotherapy (n=80). In Cox proportional hazards regression model-based univariate and multivariate analyses, pT category (pT1-3 vs pT4) was the only significant prognostic factor in patients receiving non-oxaliplatin–based adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas pT category, signet ring cell histology and cribriform comedo histology remained independent prognostic factors in patients receiving oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: pT4 status is the most significant pathologic determinant of poor outcome after fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II/III MSI-H CRC.

Abstract

Background: Although there are controversies regarding the benefit of fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC), the pathologic features affecting postchemotherapeutic prognosis in these patients have not been fully identified yet. Methods: A total of 26 histopathologic and immunohistochemical factors were comprehensively evaluated in 125 stage II or III MSI-H CRC patients who underwent curative resection followed by fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. We statistically analyzed the associations of these factors with disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Using a Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test, we determined that ulceroinfiltrative gross type (p=.003), pT4 (p<.001), pN2 (p=.002), perineural invasion (p=.001), absence of peritumoral lymphoid reaction (p=.041), signet ring cell component (p=.006), and cribriform comedo component (p=.004) were significantly associated with worse DFS in patients receiving oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (n=45). By contrast, pT4 (p<.001) and tumor budding-positivity (p=.032) were significant predictors of poor survival in patients receiving non-oxaliplatin–based adjuvant chemotherapy (n=80). In Cox proportional hazards regression model-based univariate and multivariate analyses, pT category (pT1-3 vs pT4) was the only significant prognostic factor in patients receiving non-oxaliplatin–based adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas pT category, signet ring cell histology and cribriform comedo histology remained independent prognostic factors in patients receiving oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: pT4 status is the most significant pathologic determinant of poor outcome after fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II/III MSI-H CRC.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Wolpin BM, "Systemic treatment of colorectal cancer", Gastroenterology, 134, pp.1296~1310 (2008)
  2. Kim JH, "Molecular and prognostic heterogeneity of microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer", World J Gastroenterol, 20, pp.4230~4243 (2014)
  3. Carethers JM, "Mismatch repair proficiency and in vitro response to 5-fluorouracil", Gastroenterology, 117, pp.123~131 (1999)
  4. Arnold CN, "Role of hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation in drug resistance to 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer cell lines", Int J Cancer, 106, pp.66~73 (2003)
  5. Jenkins MA, "Pathology features in Bethesda guidelines predict colorectal cancer microsatellite instability : a population-based study", Gastroenterology, 133, pp.48~56 (2007)
  6. Ligtenberg MJ, "Heritable somatic methylation and inactivation of MSH2 in families with Lynch syndrome due to deletion of the 3’ exons of TACSTD1", Nat Genet, 41, pp.112~117 (2009)
  7. 김정호, "Differential Features of Microsatellite-Unstable Colorectal Carcinomas Depending on EPCAM Expression Status", Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine, 48(4), pp.276~282 (2014), 대한병리학회[DOI]
  8. Kim JH, "Loss of CDX2", CK20expression is associated with poorly differentiated carcinoma, the CpG island methylator phenotype, and adverse prognosis in microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer, 2013, pp.37, 1532~1541
  9. Ricciardiello L, "High thymidylate synthase expression in colorectal cancer with microsatellite instability : implications for chemotherapeutic strategies", Clin Cancer Res, 11, pp.4234~4240 (2005)
  10. Sinicrope FA, "Thymidylate synthase expression in colon carcinomas with microsatellite instability", Clin Cancer Res, 12, pp.2738~2744 (2006)
  11. Popat S, "Inter-relationship between microsatellite instability, thymidylate synthase expression, and p53 status in colorectal cancer: implications for chemoresistance", BMC Cancer, 6, pp.150~ (2006)
  12. Kim GP, "Prognostic and predictive roles of high-degree microsatellite instability in colon cancer: a National Cancer Institute-National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Collaborative Study", J Clin Oncol, 25, pp.767~772 (2007)
  13. Dorard C, "Expression of a mutant HSP110 sensitizes colorectal cancer cells to chemotherapy and improves disease prognosis", Nat Med, 17, pp.1283~1289 (2011)
  14. Kim JH, "Expression status of wild-type HSP110correlates with HSP110 T17 deletion size and patient prognosis in microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer", Mod Pathol, 27, pp.443~453 (2014)
  15. Bosman FT, "WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system" (2010), IARC Press
  16. Ueno H, "Risk factors for an adverse outcome in early invasive colorectal carcinoma", Gastroenterology, 127, pp.385~394 (2004)
  17. Klintrup K, "Inflammation and prognosis in colorectal cancer", Eur J Cancer, 41, pp.2645~2654 (2005)
  18. Ueno H, "Objective criteria for crohn-like lymphoid reaction in colorectal cancer", Am J Clin Pathol, 139, pp.434~441 (2013)
  19. Wick MR, "Sporadic medullary carcinoma of the colon: a clinicopathologic comparison with nonhereditary poorly differentiated enteric-type adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine colorectal carcinoma", Am J Clin Pathol, 123, pp.56~65 (2005)
  20. Bettington M, "The serrated pathway to colorectal carcinoma: current concepts and challenges", Histopathology, 62, pp.367~386 (2013)
  21. Chirieac LR, "Phenotype of microsatellite-stable colorectal carcinomas with CpG island methylation", Am J Surg Pathol, 29, pp.429~436 (2005)
  22. Johnston PG, "The role of thymidylate synthase expression in prognosis and outcome of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer", J Clin Oncol, 12, pp.2640~2647 (1994)
  23. Marzouk O, "Review of histopathological and molecular prognostic features in colorectal cancer", Cancers (Basel), 3, pp.2767~2810 (2011)
  24. Richards CH, "The relationships between cellular components of the peritumoural inflammatory response, clinicopathological characteristics and survival in patients with primary operable colorectal cancer", Br J Cancer, 106, pp.2010~2015 (2012)
  25. Tesniere A, "Immunogenic death of colon cancer cells treated with oxaliplatin", Oncogene, 29, pp.482~491 (2010)
  26. Ross JS, "Biomarker-based prediction of response to therapy for colorectal cancer : current perspective", Am J Clin Pathol, 134, pp.478~490 (2010)
  27. Li J, "TNM staging of colorectal cancer should be reconsidered by T stage weighting", World J Gastroenterol, 20, pp.5104~5112 (2014)
  28. Snaebjornsson P, "pT4 stage II and III colon cancers carry the worst prognosis in a nationwide survival analysis : Shepherd’s local peritoneal involvement revisited", Int J Cancer, 135, pp.467~478 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Microsatellite Instability-High Gastric Cancer김지원, 김진원, 김태용, 방영주, 오도연, 이근욱, 임석아, 조성엽, 채지수대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2020 · 제52권 제4호Clinical implication of adjuvant chemotherapy according to mismatch repair status in patients with intermediate-risk stage II colon cancer: a retrospective study강병욱, 김종광, 박수연, 박준석, 백동원, 백진호, 최규석, Eunhye Chang, Hye Jin Kim영남대학교 의과대학 · Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science2022 · 제39권 제2호Prognostic Impact of Fusobacterium nucleatum Depends on Combined Tumor Location and Microsatellite Instability Status in Stage II/III Colorectal Cancers Treated with Adjuvant Chemotherapy강경훈, 김정호, 김현정, 배정모, 오현정, 조남윤대한병리학회 · Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine2019 · 제53권 제1호Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Left-Sided Colon Cancers with High Microsatellite Instability김상겸, 김현기, 김호근, 박영년, 송시영, 최준정대한병리학회 · Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine2009 · 제43권 제5호Microsatellite Instability Status in Gastric Cancer: A Reappraisal of Its Clinical Significance and Relationship with Mucin Phenotypes김아롱, 김주연, 김지연, 박도윤, 박원영, 신나리, 이창훈, 이현정, 허기영대한병리학회 · Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine2013 · 제47권 제1호A Multi-cohort Study of the Prognostic Significance of Microsatellite Instability or Mismatch Repair Status after Recurrence of Resectable Gastric Cancer김경미, 노성훈, 안지영, 이지윤, 정재호, 최민규, 최윤영, 형우진대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2020 · 제52권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)