가토의 대퇴골에 식립한 3종류의 수산화인회석 코팅 임플란트에 대한 제거회전력 비교 연구
Comparative study of removal torque of 3 different hydroxyapatite coated implants in the femur of rabbits
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Introduction: This study compared the strength of osseointegration as determined by the resistance to reverse torque rotation of three different hydroxyapatite coated implants in the rabbit femur model. Materials and Methods: Three hydroxyapatite coated implants (HAPTITE), Tapered Screw-Vent (TSV) and BioTite-H - were used. A total of 40implants were placed in the femur of 20 adult male rabbits. The animals were divided into two groups. In group A (n=10); one HAPTITE was placed into each right femur and one TSV was placed into each left femur. In group B (n=10); one HAPTITE was placed into each right femur and one BioTite-H was placed into each left femur. Five rabbits of each group were sacrificed at 4 and 8 weeks. The implants were removed by reverse torque rotation using a digital torque-measuring device. A total of 40 implants in 20 rabbits were used for the removal torque measurements. Results: In the Group A, 4 weeks after implant placement, the mean removal torque for the HAPTITE and TSV was 70.7±31.6 N cm and 28.9±15.1 N cm, respectively. Eight weeks after implant placement, the mean removal torque for the HAPTITE and TSV was 87.9±26.2 N cm and 54.9±22.4 N cm, respectively. In the Group B, 4 weeks after implant placement, the mean removal torque for the HAPTITE and BioTite-H was 58.0±29.6N cm and 37.7±14.1 N cm, respectively. Eight weeks after implant placement, the mean removal torque for the HAPTITE and BioTite-H was 91.4±47.1 N cm and 30.8±9.8 N cm. HAPTITE showed a higher removal torque than the other implants. Conclusion: These results suggest that HAPTITE increases the strength of osseointegration significantly as determined by the resistance to reverse torque rotation.
Abstract
Introduction: This study compared the strength of osseointegration as determined by the resistance to reverse torque rotation of three different hydroxyapatite coated implants in the rabbit femur model. Materials and Methods: Three hydroxyapatite coated implants (HAPTITE), Tapered Screw-Vent (TSV) and BioTite-H - were used. A total of 40implants were placed in the femur of 20 adult male rabbits. The animals were divided into two groups. In group A (n=10); one HAPTITE was placed into each right femur and one TSV was placed into each left femur. In group B (n=10); one HAPTITE was placed into each right femur and one BioTite-H was placed into each left femur. Five rabbits of each group were sacrificed at 4 and 8 weeks. The implants were removed by reverse torque rotation using a digital torque-measuring device. A total of 40 implants in 20 rabbits were used for the removal torque measurements. Results: In the Group A, 4 weeks after implant placement, the mean removal torque for the HAPTITE and TSV was 70.7±31.6 N cm and 28.9±15.1 N cm, respectively. Eight weeks after implant placement, the mean removal torque for the HAPTITE and TSV was 87.9±26.2 N cm and 54.9±22.4 N cm, respectively. In the Group B, 4 weeks after implant placement, the mean removal torque for the HAPTITE and BioTite-H was 58.0±29.6N cm and 37.7±14.1 N cm, respectively. Eight weeks after implant placement, the mean removal torque for the HAPTITE and BioTite-H was 91.4±47.1 N cm and 30.8±9.8 N cm. HAPTITE showed a higher removal torque than the other implants. Conclusion: These results suggest that HAPTITE increases the strength of osseointegration significantly as determined by the resistance to reverse torque rotation.
참고문헌 (27)
- Branemark PI, "Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies", Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg, 3, pp.81~100 (1969)
- Hutton JE, "Factors related to success and failure rates at 3-year follow-up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Branemark implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.33~42 (1995)
- Albrektsson T, "The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp.11~25 (1986)
- Shirakura M, "Tissue response to titanium implantation in the rat maxilla, with special reference to the effects of surface conditions on bone formation", Clin Oral Implants Res, 14, pp.687~696 (2003)
- Franchi M, "Biological fixation of endosseous implants", Micron, 36, pp.665~671 (2005)
- Predecki P, "Attachment of bone to threaded implants by ingrowth and mechanical interlocking", J Biomed Mater Res, 6, pp.401~412 (1972)
- Cook SD, "Interface mechanics and histology of titanium and hydroxylapatite-coated titanium for dental implant applications", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2, pp.15~22 (1987)
- Vercaigne S, "Ja nseHni stoJmAo. rphometrical and mechanical evaluation of titanium plasma-spray-coated implants placed in the cortical bone of goats", J Biomed Mater Res, 41, pp.41~48 (1998)
- Buser D, "Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants", J Biomed Mater Res, 25, pp.889~902 (1991)
- Cochran DL, "Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible", J Biomed Mater Res, 40, pp.1~11 (1998)
- S oballe K, "Hydroxyapatite coating enhances fixation of porous coated implants. A comparison in dogs between press fit and noninterference fit", Acta Orthop Scand, 61, pp.299~306 (1990)
- Block MS, "Evaluation of hydroxylapatite-coated titanium dental implants in dogs", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 45, pp.601~607 (1987)
- Wennerberg A, "A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies", Clin Oral Implants Res, 6, pp.24~30 (1995)
- Kumar M, "Electrodeposition of brushite coatings and their transformation to hydroxyapatite in aqueous solutions", J Biomed Mater Res, 45, pp.302~310 (1999)
- Baker D, "Rate of pull-out strength gain of dual-etched titanium implants: a comparative study in rabbits", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.722~728 (1999)
- Masuda T, "Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part I. In vivo studies", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.17~29 (1998)
- Cooper LF, "Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part II. In vitro studies", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.163~174 (1998)
- Rich A, "Anomalous preferences of cultured macrophages for hydrophobic and roughened substrata", J Cell Sci, 50, pp.1~7 (1981)
- Johansson C, "Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: a 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2, pp.69~75 (1987)
- Sakakura CE, "Influence of cyclosporin A therapy on bone healing around titanium implants: a histometric and biomechanic study in rabbits", J Periodontol, 74, pp.976~981 (2003)
- Sennerby L, "A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.62~71 (1992)
- Ivanoff CJ, "Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro- implants in human jawbone", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 18, pp.341~348 (2003)
- Roberts WE, "Bone physiology and metabolism. In: Misch CE, ed. Contemporary implant dentistry. 2nd ed", pp.234~235 (1999), Mosby Co
- Misch CM, "Hydroxylapatite-coated implants. Design considerations and clinical parameters", N Y State Dent J, 59, pp.12~41 (1993)
- Davies JE, "The bone-titanium interface in vitro", J Biomed Mater Res, 24, pp.1289~1306 (1990)
- Yang Y, "Osteoblast precursor cell attachment on heat-treated calcium phosphate coatings", J Dent Res, 82, pp.449~453 (2003)
- C le ｀ries L, "Dissolution behaviour of calcium phosphate coatings obtained by laser ablation", Biomaterials, 19, pp.1483~1487 (1998)