본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Skeletal stability following mandibular advancement: is it influenced by the magnitude of advancement or changes of the mandibular plane angle?

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of advancement magnitude and changes in mandibular plane angle on the stability of mandibular advancement.Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the postoperative stability of mandibular advancement in class II skeletal sub-jects who underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Radiographs taken preoperatively, immediately postoperatively and 1 year postoperatively were traced and analyzed using linear and angular measurements. To determine horizontal and vertical relapse, an X-Y coordinate system was established in which the X-axis was constructed by rotating S-N downward by 7° (approximation of the Frankfort horizontal plane) and the Y-axis was defined as a line perpendicular to the X-axis and passing through the point Sella. For certain reference points including point A, point B, pogonion and menton, the perpendicular distance between each point and both axes was determined and cephalometric variables were recorded as X and Y coordinates.Results: Twenty-five subjects were studied. A significant correlation between the amount of mandibular advancement and relapse in the B point (ver-tical and horizontal) and the pogonion point was observed (vertical and horizontal, P<0.001). Evaluation of data demonstrated a positive correlation between the mandibular plane angle (SN/ML) change and vertical relapse in the B point (P<0.05). A simple regression model demonstrated that 74% of horizontal relapse and 42.3% of vertical relapse in the B point was related to the amount of mandibular advancement. The receiver operating charac-teristic test showed that 8.5 mm mandibular advancement is related to a relapse rate of 1 mm or more in the pogonion, vertically or horizontally.Conclusion: The magnitude of mandibular advancement is a stronger surgical predictor for horizontal rather than vertical relapse at the B point. Changes in mandibular plane angle (SN/ML) during surgery affect vertical, but not horizontal relapse at the B point.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of advancement magnitude and changes in mandibular plane angle on the stability of mandibular advancement.Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the postoperative stability of mandibular advancement in class II skeletal sub-jects who underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Radiographs taken preoperatively, immediately postoperatively and 1 year postoperatively were traced and analyzed using linear and angular measurements. To determine horizontal and vertical relapse, an X-Y coordinate system was established in which the X-axis was constructed by rotating S-N downward by 7° (approximation of the Frankfort horizontal plane) and the Y-axis was defined as a line perpendicular to the X-axis and passing through the point Sella. For certain reference points including point A, point B, pogonion and menton, the perpendicular distance between each point and both axes was determined and cephalometric variables were recorded as X and Y coordinates.Results: Twenty-five subjects were studied. A significant correlation between the amount of mandibular advancement and relapse in the B point (ver-tical and horizontal) and the pogonion point was observed (vertical and horizontal, P<0.001). Evaluation of data demonstrated a positive correlation between the mandibular plane angle (SN/ML) change and vertical relapse in the B point (P<0.05). A simple regression model demonstrated that 74% of horizontal relapse and 42.3% of vertical relapse in the B point was related to the amount of mandibular advancement. The receiver operating charac-teristic test showed that 8.5 mm mandibular advancement is related to a relapse rate of 1 mm or more in the pogonion, vertically or horizontally.Conclusion: The magnitude of mandibular advancement is a stronger surgical predictor for horizontal rather than vertical relapse at the B point. Changes in mandibular plane angle (SN/ML) during surgery affect vertical, but not horizontal relapse at the B point.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Oba Y, "Comparison of stability of mandibular segments following the sagittal split ramus osteotomy with poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA) screws and titanium screws fixation", Orthodc Waves, 67, pp.1~8 (2008)
  2. Moen K, "Dental or skeletal relapse after sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery? Longterm follow-up", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 69, pp.e461~e468 (2011)
  3. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, "Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques:the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 120, pp.134~143 (2001)
  4. Berger JL, "Stability of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: rigid fixation versus transosseous wiring", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 118, pp.397~403 (2000)
  5. Hoffmannová J, "Factors affecting the stability of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of a mandible", Prague Med Rep, 109, pp.286~297 (2008)
  6. Perrott DH, "Stability of sagittal split osteotomies. A comparison of three stabilization techniques", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 78, pp.696~704 (1994)
  7. Rao SH, "Skeletal stability after bilateral sagittal split advancement and setback osteotomy of the mandible with miniplate fixation", Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr, 7, pp.9~16 (2014)
  8. Eggensperger N, "Short- and longterm skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 35, pp.36~42 (2006)
  9. den Besten CA, "Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement in bilateral sagittal split osteotomies during adolescence", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 41, pp.e78~e82 (2013)
  10. Oguz Y, "Comparison of stability of 2.0 mm standard and 2.0 mm locking miniplate", screws for the fixation of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on sheep mandibles, 2011, pp.49, 135~137
  11. Eggensperger N, "Skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement and setback in single-jaw surgery", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 62, pp.1486~1496 (2004)
  12. Frey DR, "Alteration of the mandibular plane during sagittal split advancement: shortand long-term stability", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 104, pp.160~169 (2007)
  13. Van Sickels JE, "A retrospective study of relapse in rigidly fixated sagittal split osteotomies: contributing factors", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 93, pp.413~418 (1988)
  14. Joss CU, "Stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery with rigid internal fixation: a systematic review", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 67, pp.301~313 (2009)
  15. Van Sickels JE, "A comparative study of bicortical screws and suspension wires versus bicortical screws in large mandibular advancements", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 49, pp.1293~1298 (1991)
  16. Kierl MJ, "A 3-year evaluation of skeletal stability of mandibular advancement with rigid fixation", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 48, pp.587~592 (1990)
  17. Scheerlinck JP, "Sagittal split advancement osteotomies stabilized with miniplates. A 2-5-year follow-up", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 23, pp.127~131 (1994)
  18. Kallela I, "Skeletal stability following mandibular advancement and rigid fixation with polylactide biodegradable screws", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 27, pp.3~8 (1998)
  19. Arpornmaeklong P, "Skeletal stability following maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 33, pp.656~663 (2004)
  20. Bouwman JP, "The value of long-term follow-up of mandibular advancement surgery in patients with a low to normal mandibular plane angle", Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir, 1, pp.311~315 (1997)
  21. Emshoff R, "Stability after rigid fixation of simultaneous maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement osteotomies", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 32, pp.137~142 (2003)
  22. Mobarak KA, "Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle class II patients:different long-term skeletal responses", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 119, pp.368~381 (2001)
  23. Ow A, "Skeletal stability and complications of bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular distraction osteogenesis:an evidence-based review", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 67, pp.2344~2353 (2009)
  24. Yoshida K, "Long-term prognosis of BSSO mandibular relapse and its relation to different facial types", Angle Orthod, 70, pp.220~226 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

Investigating the effect of age on skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback권대근, 김진욱, 이상한, Chung-O Lee, Hee-Don Hwang, Jinwook Choi대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2012 · 제38권 제6호Analysis of postsurgical relapse patterns in one-jaw surgery: skeletal factors and clustering analysis in patients with mandibular setbackKim Jong-Wan, Lee Jong-Ho, Lee Nam-Ki, Sim Hye-Young, Yun Pil-Young대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2024 · 제50권 제5호Comparative study of postoperative stability between conventional orthognathic surgery and a surgery-first orthognathic approach after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for skeletal class III correction김수관, 김원기, 마득현, 오지수, 유경환, 유재식, 정서윤대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2017 · 제43권 제1호Retrospective study on change in pharyngeal airway space and hyoid bone position after mandibular setback surgeryDoo Yeon Hwang, Min Woo Han, Seung Il Song, Sung Woon On대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2015 · 제41권 제5호Positional change of the condyle after orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment: is there a relationship to skeletal relapse?박영욱, 장인산, 차봉균, 최동순, Husanov Zafar대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2014 · 제40권 제4호Correlation between skeletal and dental changes after mandibular setback surgery-first orthodontic treatment: Cone-beam computed tomography-generated half-cephalograms김성식, 김용일, 박수병, 손우성, 최윤경, Chang-Hoon Rhee대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2015 · 제45권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)