본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

비골 골절에 대한 최근 5년간의 후향적 연구

A 5-year retrospective study on nasal bone fracture

2

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

This study was performed to investigate the incidence, types of fracture, treatment, associated fracture and complications in patients with nasal bone fracture. Materials and methods: Clinical examination, patient’s records and radiographic images were evaluated in 230 cases of nasal bone fractures who were treated at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital for recent 5 years; from January 2002 to December 2006. Results: 1. The age of patient was ranged from 4 to 77 years (mean age=36.6 years); Males was 75.7% (n=174), and females 24.3% (n=56). 2. The cause of the nasal bone fracture in this study was a fall or slip down (28.8%, n=66), sports accident (26.0%, n=60), fighting (21.3%, n=49), traffic accident (9.6%, n=22), industrial trauma (7.8%, n=18), and the others (6.6%, n=15). 3. For the patterns of fracture, simple fracture without displacement occured in 10.4% (n=24). Simple fracture with displacement without septal bone fracture was found in 49.5% (n=114). Simple fracture with displacement in company with septal bone fracture showed in 32.6% (n=75). Comminuted fracture with severe depression was presented in 7.4% (n=17). 4. The reduction the displaced nasal bone was carried out in 2 to 10 days (mean 6.8 days) after the injury. 5. Nasal bone fracure associated with Le Fort I fracture (6.5%, n=6.5), Le Fort II fracture (7.4%, n=17), Le Fort III fracture (1.3%, n=3), NOE fracture (13.9%, n=32), ZMC fracture (17.4%, 40), maxillary bone fracture (8.3%, n=19), orbital blow-out fracture (15.7%, n=36), frontal bone fracture (1.3%, n=3) and alveolar bone fracture (10.9%, n=25). 6. The major type of treatment method was closed reduction in 90% (n=207), open reduction in 3% (n=7), and observation in 7% (n=16). 7. There were some complications such as ecchymosis, hyposmia, hypo esthesia and residual nasal deformity which are compatible. Open rhinoplasty was conducted for 3 patients who had residual nasal deformity. Conclusions: These results suggest that most of nasal bone fractures are occurred physically active aged groups(age 10-49 years) and could be treated successfully with closed reduction at 7 days after the injury.

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the incidence, types of fracture, treatment, associated fracture and complications in patients with nasal bone fracture. Materials and methods: Clinical examination, patient’s records and radiographic images were evaluated in 230 cases of nasal bone fractures who were treated at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital for recent 5 years; from January 2002 to December 2006. Results: 1. The age of patient was ranged from 4 to 77 years (mean age=36.6 years); Males was 75.7% (n=174), and females 24.3% (n=56). 2. The cause of the nasal bone fracture in this study was a fall or slip down (28.8%, n=66), sports accident (26.0%, n=60), fighting (21.3%, n=49), traffic accident (9.6%, n=22), industrial trauma (7.8%, n=18), and the others (6.6%, n=15). 3. For the patterns of fracture, simple fracture without displacement occured in 10.4% (n=24). Simple fracture with displacement without septal bone fracture was found in 49.5% (n=114). Simple fracture with displacement in company with septal bone fracture showed in 32.6% (n=75). Comminuted fracture with severe depression was presented in 7.4% (n=17). 4. The reduction the displaced nasal bone was carried out in 2 to 10 days (mean 6.8 days) after the injury. 5. Nasal bone fracure associated with Le Fort I fracture (6.5%, n=6.5), Le Fort II fracture (7.4%, n=17), Le Fort III fracture (1.3%, n=3), NOE fracture (13.9%, n=32), ZMC fracture (17.4%, 40), maxillary bone fracture (8.3%, n=19), orbital blow-out fracture (15.7%, n=36), frontal bone fracture (1.3%, n=3) and alveolar bone fracture (10.9%, n=25). 6. The major type of treatment method was closed reduction in 90% (n=207), open reduction in 3% (n=7), and observation in 7% (n=16). 7. There were some complications such as ecchymosis, hyposmia, hypo esthesia and residual nasal deformity which are compatible. Open rhinoplasty was conducted for 3 patients who had residual nasal deformity. Conclusions: These results suggest that most of nasal bone fractures are occurred physically active aged groups(age 10-49 years) and could be treated successfully with closed reduction at 7 days after the injury.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Muraoka M, "Twenty years of statistics and observation of facial bone fracture", Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 538, pp.261~265 (1998)
  2. Murray JA, "Preface. Fracture of the nasal bones", Fac Plas Surg, 8(4), pp.3~ (1992)
  3. Klenk G, "Etiology and patterns of facial fractures in the United Arab Emirates", J Craniofacial Surg, 14, pp.78~84 (2003)
  4. Bernardo FB, "Epidemiological analysis of maxillofacial fractures in Brazil: A 5-year prospective study", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 102(1), pp.28~34 (2006)
  5. Hwang K, "Anaylsis of nasal bone fractures; A six-year study of 503 patients", J Cranio Surg, 17(2), pp.261~264 (2006)
  6. Harrison HD, "Nasal injuries: their pathogenisis and treatment", Br J Plast Surg, 32(1), pp.57~64 (1979)
  7. Murray JAM, "The treatment of nasal injuries by manipulation", J Laryngol Otol, 94, pp.1405~1410 (1980)
  8. Stranc MF, "A classification of injuries of the nasal skeleton", Ann Plast Surg, 2, pp.1~4 (1978)
  9. Kazanjian VH, "The surgical treatment of facial injuries. Third ed", pp.267~286 (1974), Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co
  10. Jazibi B, "Subluxation of the nasal septum in the newborn: etiology, diagnosis and treatment", Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 10(1), pp.125~138 (1977)
  11. Hofmann WB, "Trauma of the mandible and maxilla. In Paparella, M,M. and Shumrick, DA: Otolaryngol Vol. III. 2nd ed", pp.2681~ (1980), Philadelphia, WB Saunders Co
  12. Stone TW, "Comprehensive care of bilateral maxillary fractures", Laryngo, 83(2), pp.179~237 (1973)
  13. Lundin K, "Nasal injuries: One thousand maxillofacial and related fracture at the ENT-clinc in Gothenberg", Acta Otolaryngol, 75, pp.359~361 (1973)
  14. Hong SB, , J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg, 23(6), pp.1572~1582 (1996)
  15. Murray JAM, "Open or closed reduction of the fractured nose", J Larygol Otol, 110, pp.797~802 (1984)
  16. Richard HH, "A review of 100 closed head injuries associated with facial fractures", J Oral & Maxiilfac Surg, 50, pp.218~222 (1992)
  17. Turvey TA, "Midfacial fractures: A retrospective analysis of 593 cases", J Oral Surg, 35, pp.887~891 (1977)
  18. Ryu SJ, "A clinical study on the nature and severity of oral & maxillofacial injuries by cause", J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg, 17(2), pp.11~20 (1991)
  19. Dingman RO, "Surgery of facial fractures. 1st ed", pp.267~ (1964), Philadelphia, WB Saunder Co
  20. Yang IS, "A clinical study of the nasal bone factures", J Kor Maxillofac plast Recon, 16(4), pp.419~427 (1994)
  21. Goode RL, "Management of nasal fracture in children", Clin Pediatr, 1, pp.526~533 (1972)
  22. Colton JJ, "Management of nasal fractures", Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 19, pp.73~85 (1986)
  23. Mayell MF, "Nasal fractures: Their occurrence, management and some late results", J Roy Coll Surg, 18, pp.31~36 (1973)
  24. Moran WB, "Nasal trauma in children", Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 10, pp.95~101 (1977)
  25. Richrd H, "The closed reduction of nasal fractures", J Oral & Maxillofac Surg, 49, pp.1288~1292 (1991)
  26. Finkle DR, "Comparison of the diagnostic methods used on maxillofacial trauma", Plast Reconstr Surg, 75(1), pp.32~41 (1985)
  27. Becker OJ, "Nasal fractures: analysis of 100 cases", Arch otolaryngol, 48, pp.344~352 (1948)
  28. Illum P, "Role of fixation in the treatment of nasal fractures", Clin Otolaryngol, 8, pp.191~195 (1983)

관련 논문AI추천

Fracture patterns in the maxillofacial region: a four-year retrospective studyDong-Whan Shin, Ho Lee, Jeong-Hwan Kim, Jun-Young Kim, Kyung-Pil Park, Seong-Un Lim, Won-Bae Chun대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2015 · 제41권 제6호Etiology and Patterns of Maxillofacial Fractures in 518 patients in Korea박창주, 송승일, 유정규, 이은경, 정일혁, 황경균대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2008 · 제34권 제1호하악 과두 골절에 대한 4년간의 후향적 임상연구국민석, 김현섭, 류재영, 박충열, 박홍주, 오희균대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2008 · 제34권 제3호소아, 청소년기 악안면 및 비골 골절의 연령 분포와 장기 결과 분석: 대한민국 건강보험심사평가원(HIRA) 빅데이터 활용민진홍, 백재호, 윤정현, 이의석, 임호경, 정유진대한치과의사협회 · 대한치과의사협회지2025 · 제63권 제12호전산화단층촬영 분석을 통한 비골 골절 환자에서의 비중격 손상에 관한 고찰박형욱, 윤여준, 이용선, 이우현, 이호일, 조주은, 주준범대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2007 · 제50권 제10호Retrospective clinical study of mandible fractures권용대, 문창식, 오주영, 이백수, 이정우, 이현우, 정해원, 최병준대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2014 · 제40권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)