Efficacy of Debridement for Early Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Hip Arthroplasty
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: In early prosthetic joint infection after hip arthroplasty, debridement with prosthesis retention may be performed for implant salvage, but the reported success rates are highly variable. Hence we reviewed the outcome of radical debridement and retention of prosthesis using established diagnostic criteria and surgical procedures inrelation to significant variables including clinical characteristics, pathogenicity, and antibiotic treatment. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 20 patients (11 men and 9 women) with early prosthetic joint infection after unilateral hip arthroplasty, treated by radical debridement with retention of prosthesis from January 2000 to May 2011. Average follow-up period was 55 months (12-178 months). The outcome was evaluated and analyzed based on recurrence of infection and clinical (Harris hip score) and radiological criteria. Results: Pathogens were isolated from 11 hips (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA] in three, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis [MRSE] in two, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus [MSSA] in one, Acinetobacter baumannii in two, Enterococcus faecalis in two patients, and Enterococcus, Citrobacter species in one). The mean duration of antibiotic administration was 43.5 days. Recurrence of infection was not observed in any case. Average Harris hip score was 91 points at the last follow-up. Revision surgery was not required for any reason including implant failure. Dislocation occurred in two hips after debridement and was treated conservatively. Conclusion: Radical debridement with prosthesis retention is an effective procedure for early prosthetic joint infection after hip arthroplasty in carefully selected patients and with early diagnosis.
Abstract
Purpose: In early prosthetic joint infection after hip arthroplasty, debridement with prosthesis retention may be performed for implant salvage, but the reported success rates are highly variable. Hence we reviewed the outcome of radical debridement and retention of prosthesis using established diagnostic criteria and surgical procedures inrelation to significant variables including clinical characteristics, pathogenicity, and antibiotic treatment. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 20 patients (11 men and 9 women) with early prosthetic joint infection after unilateral hip arthroplasty, treated by radical debridement with retention of prosthesis from January 2000 to May 2011. Average follow-up period was 55 months (12-178 months). The outcome was evaluated and analyzed based on recurrence of infection and clinical (Harris hip score) and radiological criteria. Results: Pathogens were isolated from 11 hips (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA] in three, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis [MRSE] in two, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus [MSSA] in one, Acinetobacter baumannii in two, Enterococcus faecalis in two patients, and Enterococcus, Citrobacter species in one). The mean duration of antibiotic administration was 43.5 days. Recurrence of infection was not observed in any case. Average Harris hip score was 91 points at the last follow-up. Revision surgery was not required for any reason including implant failure. Dislocation occurred in two hips after debridement and was treated conservatively. Conclusion: Radical debridement with prosthesis retention is an effective procedure for early prosthetic joint infection after hip arthroplasty in carefully selected patients and with early diagnosis.
참고문헌 (39)
- Gristina AG, "Bacterial adherence to biomaterials and tissue. The significance of its role in clinical sepsis", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 67, pp.264~273 (1985)
- Song Z, "Prosthesis infections after orthopedic joint replacement: the possible role of bacterial biofilms", Orthop Rev(Pavia), 5, pp.65~71 (2013)
- Kaltsas DS, "Infection after total hip arthroplasty", Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 86, pp.267~271 (2004)
- Fisman DN, "Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 2 management strategies for infected total hip arthroplasty in the elderly", Clin Infect Dis, 32, pp.419~430 (2001)
- Brandt CM, "Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection treated with debridement and prosthesis retention", Clin Infect Dis, 24, pp.914~919 (1997)
- Tsukayama DT, "Infection after total hip arthroplasty. A study of the treatment of one hundred and six infections", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 78, pp.512~523 (1996)
- Zimmerli W, "Role of rifampin for treatment of orthopedic implantrelated staphylococcal infections: a randomized controlled trial. Foreign-Body Infection (FBI) Study Group", JAMA, 279, pp.1537~1541 (1998)
- Crockarell JR, "Treatment of infection with de´bridement and retention of the components following hip arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 80, pp.1306~1313 (1998)
- Choong PF, "Risk factors associated with acute hip prosthetic joint infections and outcome of treatment with a rifampinbased regimen", Acta Orthop, 78, pp.755~765 (2007)
- Azzam KA, "Irrigation and debridement in the management of prosthetic joint infection: traditional indications revisited", J Arthroplasty, 25, pp.1022~1027 (2010)
- Spangehl MJ, "Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 81, pp.672~683 (1999)
- Parvizi J, "Periprosthetic infection: what are the diagnostic challenges?", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 88(4), pp.138~147 (2006)
- Yi PH, "The 2013 Frank Stinchfield Award: Diagnosis of infection in the early postoperative period after total hip arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 472, pp.424~429 (2014)
- Senthi S, "Infection in total hip replacement: meta-analysis", Int Orthop, 35, pp.253~260 (2011)
- Coventry MB, "Treatment of infections occurring in total hip surgery", Orthop Clin North Am, 6, pp.991~1003 (1975)
- Smith PN, "Microbial contamination and the sterilization", disinfection of surgical guides used in the placement of endosteal implants, 2011, pp.26, 274~281
- "Guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities"[URL]
- Oduwole KO1, "Anti-Biofilm Activity of Sub-Inhibitory Povidone-Iodine Concentrations against Staphylococcus Epidermidis and Staphylococcus Aureus", J Orthop Res, 28, pp.1252~1255 (2010)
- DeLee JG, "Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 121, pp.20~32 (1976)
- Sutherland CJ, "A tenyear follow-up of one hundred consecutive Mu¨ller curvedstem total hip-replacement arthroplasties", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 64, pp.970~982 (1982)
- Engh CA, "Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 257, pp.107~128 (1990)
- Kawamura H, "The porous coated anatomic total hip replacement. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study of a cementless total hip arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 83-A, pp.1333~1338 (2001)
- Gruen TA, "“Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 141, pp.17~27 (1979)
- Maloney WJ, "Endosteal erosion in association with stable uncemented femoral components", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 72, pp.1025~1034 (1990)
- Morrey BF, "Long-term results of various treatment options for infected total knee arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 248, pp.120~128 (1989)
- Waldman BJ, "Infected total knee arthroplasty treated by arthroscopic irrigation and de´bridement", J Arthroplasty, 15, pp.430~436 (2000)
- Pulido L, "Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466, pp.1710~1715 (2008)
- Parvizi J, "Management of periprosthetic joint infection: the current knowledge: AAOS exhibit selection", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 94, pp.e104~ (2012)
- Koyonos L, "Infection control rate of irrigation and de´bridement for periprosthetic joint infection", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 469, pp.3043~3048 (2011)
- Odum SM, "Periprosthetic Infection Consortium. Irrigation and debridement for periprosthetic infections: does the organism matter?", J Arthroplasty, 26(6), pp.114~118 (2011)
- Meehan AM, "Outcome of penicillin-susceptible streptococcal prosthetic joint infection treated with debridement and retention of the prosthesis", Clin Infect Dis, 36, pp.845~849 (2003)
- Vilchez F, "Outcome and predictors of treatment failure in early postsurgical prosthetic joint infections due to Staphylococcus aureus treated with debridement", Clin Microbiol Infect, 17, pp.439~444 (2011)
- Barbera´n J, "Conservative treatment of staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections in elderly patients", Am J Med, 119, pp.e7~e10 (2006)
- Van Kleunen JP, "Irrigation and de´bridement and prosthesis retention for treating acute periprosthetic infections", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, pp.2024~2028 (2010)
- Bassetti M, "Linezolid in the treatment of Gram-positive prosthetic joint infections", J Antimicrob Chemother, 55, pp.387~390 (2005)
- Tattevin P, "Prosthetic joint infection: when can prosthesis salvage be considered?", Clin Infect Dis, 29, pp.292~295 (1999)
- Marculescu CE, "Outcome of prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and retention of components", Clin Infect Dis, 42, pp.471~478 (2006)
- Deirmengian C, "Open debridement of acute gram-positive infections after total knee arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 416, pp.129~134 (2003)
- Zimmerli W, "Prosthetic-joint infections", N Engl J Med, 351, pp.1645~1654 (2004)