중화상 환자에서 중심정맥 카테터 감염: 쇄골하정맥과 대퇴정맥의 비교
Central Venous Catheter-related Infection in Major Burn Patients: Comparison of Subclavian Vein and Femoral Vein
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: A central venous catheter (CVC) is usually inserted in patients with severe burns and the selection of the CVC is often difficult due to widespread burned skin. We investigated the incidences of colonization and catheter-related blood stream infection (CRBSI) according to the insertion site of the CVC in major burn patients. Methods: In 63 adult massive burn patients in the intensive care unit, 93 CVCs (47 polyurethane standard CVCs and 46 Oligon anti-mocrobial CVCs) were randomly inserted via the subclavian vein (SCV group, n = 66) or femoral vein (FEV group, n = 27). All catheter tips removed were routinely cultured. Bacterial findings from the burn wound and peripheral blood were also monitored in all patients. Results: There was no significant difference in the average insertion length of the CVC (14.3 ± 6.8 days in SCV and 13.6 ± 3.8 days in FEV) between the two groups. There were no significant differences in CVC colonization (48.5% in SCV and 63.0% in FEV) and CRBSI (7.6% in SCV and 11.1% in FEV) between the two groups. Logistic analysis found that the use of polyurethane standard CVC is significantly associated with increased risk of CVC colonization (odds ratio = 2.68). Conclusions: The placement of the CVC via the femoral vein does not increase the incidence of CVC colonization in massive burn patients. The use of Oligon anti-microbial CVC may be helpful to reduce CVC colonization in major burn patients.
Abstract
Background: A central venous catheter (CVC) is usually inserted in patients with severe burns and the selection of the CVC is often difficult due to widespread burned skin. We investigated the incidences of colonization and catheter-related blood stream infection (CRBSI) according to the insertion site of the CVC in major burn patients. Methods: In 63 adult massive burn patients in the intensive care unit, 93 CVCs (47 polyurethane standard CVCs and 46 Oligon anti-mocrobial CVCs) were randomly inserted via the subclavian vein (SCV group, n = 66) or femoral vein (FEV group, n = 27). All catheter tips removed were routinely cultured. Bacterial findings from the burn wound and peripheral blood were also monitored in all patients. Results: There was no significant difference in the average insertion length of the CVC (14.3 ± 6.8 days in SCV and 13.6 ± 3.8 days in FEV) between the two groups. There were no significant differences in CVC colonization (48.5% in SCV and 63.0% in FEV) and CRBSI (7.6% in SCV and 11.1% in FEV) between the two groups. Logistic analysis found that the use of polyurethane standard CVC is significantly associated with increased risk of CVC colonization (odds ratio = 2.68). Conclusions: The placement of the CVC via the femoral vein does not increase the incidence of CVC colonization in massive burn patients. The use of Oligon anti-microbial CVC may be helpful to reduce CVC colonization in major burn patients.
참고문헌 (18)
- Kompoti MG, "Critical care of the burn patient: the first 48 hours", Crit Care Med, 38, pp.1391~ (2010)
- Kealey GP, "Prospective comparison of two management strategies of central venous catheters in burn patients", J Trauma, 38, pp.344~349 (1995)
- Ramos GE, "Catheter infection risk related to the distance between insertion site and burned area", J Burn Care Rehabil, 23, pp.266~271 (2002)
- Bouza E, "Selection of the vascular catheter: can it minimise the risk of infection", Int J Antimicrob Agents, 36(2), pp.S22~25 (2010)
- Still JM, "Central line-related sepsis in acute burn patients", Am Surg, 64, pp.165~170 (1998)
- Lucet JC, "Infectious risk associated with arterial catheters compared with central venous catheters", Crit Care Med, 38, pp.1030~1035 (2010)
- Gowardman JR, "Influence of insertion site on central venous catheter colonization and bloodstream infection rates", Intensive Care Med, 34, pp.1038~1045 (2008)
- Osma S, "Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated catheters on catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients in an intensive care unit", J Hosp Infect, 62, pp.156~162 (2006)
- Durbec O, "A prospective evaluation of the use of femoral venous catheters in critically ill adults", Crit Care Med, 25, pp.1986~1989 (1997)
- Murr MM, "A prospective safety study of femoral vein versus nonfemoral vein catheterization in patients with burns", J Burn Care Rehabil, 12, pp.576~578 (1991)
- Ishizuka M, "Femoral venous catheterization is a major risk factor for central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection", J Invest Surg, 22, pp.16~21 (2009)
- Lorente L, "Microorganisms responsible for intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection according to the catheter site", Crit Care Med, 35, pp.2424~2427 (2007)
- Joyce-Wöhrmann RM, "Determination of the silver ion release from polyurethanes enriched with silver", Infection, 27(1), pp.S46~48 (1999)
- Moretti EW, "Impact of central venous catheter type and methods on catheter-related colonization and bacteraemia", J Hosp Infect, 61, pp.139~145 (2005)
- Corral L, "A prospective, randomized study in critically ill patients using the Oligon Vantex catheter", J Hosp Infect, 55, pp.212~219 (2003)
- Fearonce G, "Peripherally inserted central venous catheters and central venous catheters in burn patients: a comparative review", J Burn Care Res, 31, pp.31~35 (2010)
- Rickard CM, "Routine changing of intravenous administration sets does not reduce colonization or infection in central venous catheters", Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 25, pp.650~655 (2004)
- King B, "Timing of central venous catheter exchange and frequency of bacteremia in burn patients", J Burn Care Res, 28, pp.859~860 (2007)