Is open peer review, a growing trend in scholarly publishing, a double-edged sword?

참고문헌 (10)

1. Zuckerman H, "Patterns of evaluation in science : institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system", Minerva, 9, pp.66~100 (1971)[DOI]
2. Weller AC, "Editorial peer review: its strengths and weaknesses", Information Today, 1~3 (2001)
3. Mulligan A, "Is peer review in crisis", Perspect Publ, 2, pp.1~6 (2004)
4. Publishing Research Consortium peer review survey 2015, "Publishing Research Consortium", Mark Ware Consulting, 2~4 (2015)
5. Lachmann P, "The COPE report 2002: annual report of the Committee on Publication Ethics", pp.11~ (2002), BMJ Books
6. Justice AC, "Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER investigators", JAMA, 280, pp.240~242 (1998)[DOI]
7. "Transparency — the key to trust in peer review"[URL]
8. Ford E, "Open peer review at four STEM journals: an observational overview", F1000Res, 4, pp.6~ (2015)[DOI]
9. "Is open peer review the way forward?"[URL]
10. van Rooyen S, "Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations:a randomised trial", BMJ, 318, pp.23~27 (1999)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천