본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Outcomes of critically ill patients according to the perception of intensivists on the appropriateness of intensive care unit admission

3

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background It is important for intensivists to determine which patient may benefit from intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We aimed to assess the outcomes of patients perceived as non-beneficially or beneficially admitted to the ICU and evaluate whether their prognosis was consistent with the intensivists’ perception. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted on patients admitted to the medical ICU of a tertiary referral center between February and April 2014. The perceptions of four intensivists at admission (day 1) and on day 3 were investigated as non-beneficial admission, beneficial admission, or indeterminate state. Results A total of 210 patients were enrolled. On days 1 and 3, 22 (10%) and 23 (11%) patients were judged as having non-beneficial admission; 166 (79%) and 159 (79%), beneficial admission; and 22 (10%) and 21 (10%), indeterminate state, respectively. The ICU mortality rates of each group on day 1 were 59%, 23%, and 59%, respectively; their 6-month mortality rates were 100%, 48%, and 82%, respectively. The perceptions of non-beneficial admission or indeterminate state were the significant predictors of ICU mortality (day 3; odds ratio [OR], 4.049; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.892–8.664; P<0.001) and 6-month mortality (day 1: OR, 4.983; 95% CI, 1.260–19.703; P=0.022; day 3: OR, 4.459; 95% CI, 1.162–17.121; P=0.029). Conclusions The outcomes of patients perceived as having non-beneficial admission were extremely poor. The intensivists’ perception was important in predicting patients’ outcomes and was more consistent with long-term prognosis than with immediate outcomes. The intensivists’ role can be reflected in limited ICU resource utilization.

Abstract

Background It is important for intensivists to determine which patient may benefit from intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We aimed to assess the outcomes of patients perceived as non-beneficially or beneficially admitted to the ICU and evaluate whether their prognosis was consistent with the intensivists’ perception. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted on patients admitted to the medical ICU of a tertiary referral center between February and April 2014. The perceptions of four intensivists at admission (day 1) and on day 3 were investigated as non-beneficial admission, beneficial admission, or indeterminate state. Results A total of 210 patients were enrolled. On days 1 and 3, 22 (10%) and 23 (11%) patients were judged as having non-beneficial admission; 166 (79%) and 159 (79%), beneficial admission; and 22 (10%) and 21 (10%), indeterminate state, respectively. The ICU mortality rates of each group on day 1 were 59%, 23%, and 59%, respectively; their 6-month mortality rates were 100%, 48%, and 82%, respectively. The perceptions of non-beneficial admission or indeterminate state were the significant predictors of ICU mortality (day 3; odds ratio [OR], 4.049; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.892–8.664; P<0.001) and 6-month mortality (day 1: OR, 4.983; 95% CI, 1.260–19.703; P=0.022; day 3: OR, 4.459; 95% CI, 1.162–17.121; P=0.029). Conclusions The outcomes of patients perceived as having non-beneficial admission were extremely poor. The intensivists’ perception was important in predicting patients’ outcomes and was more consistent with long-term prognosis than with immediate outcomes. The intensivists’ role can be reflected in limited ICU resource utilization.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Huynh TN, "The opportunity cost of futile treatment in the ICU", Crit Care Med, 42, pp.1977~1982 (2014)
  2. Carter HE, "Incidence, duration and cost of futile treatment in end-of-life hospital admissions to three Australian public-sector tertiary hospitals: a retrospective multicentre cohort study", BMJ Open, 7, pp.e017661~ (2017)
  3. Piers RD, "Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physicians", JAMA, 306, pp.2694~2703 (2011)
  4. Schwarzkopf D, "Perceived nonbeneficial treatment of patients, burnout, and intention to leave the job among ICU nurses and junior and senior physicians", Crit Care Med, 45, pp.e265~e273 (2017)
  5. Niederman MS, "The delivery of futile care is harmful to other patients", Crit Care Med, 38(10 Suppl), pp.S518~S522 (2010)
  6. Angus DC, "Toward better ICU Use at the end of life", JAMA, 315, pp.255~256 (2016)
  7. Nates JL, "ICU admission, discharge, and triage guidelines: a framework to enhance clinical operations, development of institutional policies, and further research", Crit Care Med, 44, pp.1553~1602 (2016)
  8. Kon AA, "Defining futile and potentially inappropriate interventions : a policy statement from the Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee", Crit Care Med, 44, pp.1769~1774 (2016)
  9. Downar J, "Nonbeneficial treatment Canada: definitions, causes, and potential solutions from the perspective of healthcare practitioners", Crit Care Med, 43, pp.270~281 (2015)
  10. Huynh TN, "The frequency and cost of treatment perceived to be futile in critical care", JAMA Intern Med, 173, pp.1887~1894 (2013)
  11. Palda VA, "“Futile” care: do we provide it? Why? A semistructured, Canada-wide survey of intensive care unit doctors and nurses", J Crit Care, 20, pp.207~213 (2005)
  12. Afessa B, "Identifying potentially ineffective care in the sickest critically illpatients on the third ICU day", Chest, 126, pp.1905~1909 (2004)
  13. Detsky ME, "discriminative accuracy of physician and nurse predictions for survival and functional outcomes 6 months after an ICU admission", JAMA, 317, pp.2187~2195 (2017)
  14. Herridge MS, "Prognostication and intensive care unit outcome : the evolving role of scoring systems", Clin Chest Med, 24, pp.751~762 (2003)
  15. Vincent JL, "Clinical review : scoring systems in the critically ill", Crit Care, 14, pp.207~ (2010)
  16. Cooke CR, "The siren song of simple tools that predict mortality", Respir Care, 56, pp.533~535 (2011)
  17. Sinuff T, "Mortality predictions in the intensive care unit : comparing physicians with scoring systems", Crit Care Med, 34, pp.878~885 (2006)
  18. Dolgin M, "Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of diseases of the heart and great vessels" (1994), Little Brown & Co
  19. Fletcher CM, "The clinical diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema : an experimental study", Proc R Soc Med, 45, pp.577~584 (1952)
  20. Fletcher CM, "The significance of respiratory symptoms and the diagnosis of chronic bronchitis in a working population", Br Med J, 2, pp.257~266 (1959)
  21. McCaffery M, "Pain: clinical manual for nursing practice" (1989), Mosby

관련 논문AI추천

Characteristics and Outcomes of Potentially Inappropriate Admissions to the Intensive Care UnitJinwoo Lee, Sang-Min Lee, Sooim Sin대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2019 · 제34권 제1호Can the intensivists predict the outcomes of critically ill patients on the appropriateness of intensive care unit admission for limited intensive care unit resources ?박승용대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2021 · 제36권 제4호Outcomes of very elderly (≥ 80 years) critical-ill patients in a medical intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital in Korea김호철, 유정완, 이승준, 이승훈, 이종덕, 이태원, 정이영, 조유지, 주선미대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2017 · 제32권 제4호Effect of Timing of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders on the Clinical Outcome of Critically Ill Patients백문성, Chae-Man Lim, Jin Won Huh, Sang-Bum Hong, Younsuck Koh대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2016 · 제31권 제3호Impact of Intensivist and Nursing Staff on Critically Ill Patient Mortality: A Retrospective Analysis of the Korean NHIS Cohort Data, 2011–2015김영삼, 박은철, 이선민, 이수환, 한창훈, 홍정화연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2021 · 제62권 제1호The Ability of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV Score to Predict Mortality in a Single Tertiary Hospital권인선, 문재영, 민나은, 박동일, 박연희, 박영선, 박정은, 설영훈, 유상훈, 이영석, 이주상, 전규락, 정채욱, 최재우대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2017 · 제32권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)