Effect of a nutritional support protocol on enteral nutrition and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Enteral nutrition (EN) supply within 48 hours after intensive care unit (ICU) admission improves clinical outcomes. The “new ICU evaluation & development of nutritional support protocol (NICE-NST)” was introduced in an ICU of tertiary academic hospital. This study showed that early EN through protocolized nutritional support would supply more nutrition to improve clinical outcomes.Methods: This study screened 170 patients and 62 patients were finally enrolled; patients who were supplied nutrition without the protocol were classified as the control group (n=40), while those who were supplied according to the protocol were classified as the test group (n=22).Results: In the test group, EN started significantly earlier (3.7±0.4 days vs. 2.4±0.5 days, P=0.010). EN calorie (4.0±1.0 kcal/kg vs. 6.7±0.9 kcal/kg, P=0.006) and protein (0.17±0.04 g/kg vs. 0.32±0.04 g/kg, P=0.002) supplied were significantly higher in the test group. Although EN was supplied through continuous feeding in the test group, there was no difference in complications such as feeding hold due to excessive gastric residual volume or vomit, and hyper- or hypo-glycemia between the two groups. Hospital mortality was significantly lower in the group that started EN within 1.5 days (42.9% vs. 11.8%, P=0.018). The proportion of patients who started EN within 1.5 days was higher in the test group (40.9% vs. 17.5%, P=0.044).Conclusions: The NICE-NST may improve EN supply and mortality of critically ill patients without increasing complications.
Abstract
Background: Enteral nutrition (EN) supply within 48 hours after intensive care unit (ICU) admission improves clinical outcomes. The “new ICU evaluation & development of nutritional support protocol (NICE-NST)” was introduced in an ICU of tertiary academic hospital. This study showed that early EN through protocolized nutritional support would supply more nutrition to improve clinical outcomes.Methods: This study screened 170 patients and 62 patients were finally enrolled; patients who were supplied nutrition without the protocol were classified as the control group (n=40), while those who were supplied according to the protocol were classified as the test group (n=22).Results: In the test group, EN started significantly earlier (3.7±0.4 days vs. 2.4±0.5 days, P=0.010). EN calorie (4.0±1.0 kcal/kg vs. 6.7±0.9 kcal/kg, P=0.006) and protein (0.17±0.04 g/kg vs. 0.32±0.04 g/kg, P=0.002) supplied were significantly higher in the test group. Although EN was supplied through continuous feeding in the test group, there was no difference in complications such as feeding hold due to excessive gastric residual volume or vomit, and hyper- or hypo-glycemia between the two groups. Hospital mortality was significantly lower in the group that started EN within 1.5 days (42.9% vs. 11.8%, P=0.018). The proportion of patients who started EN within 1.5 days was higher in the test group (40.9% vs. 17.5%, P=0.044).Conclusions: The NICE-NST may improve EN supply and mortality of critically ill patients without increasing complications.
참고문헌 (18)
- Kreymann KG, "ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition : intensive care", Clin Nutr, 25, pp.210~223 (2006)
- Dhaliwal R, "The Canadian critical care nutrition guidelines in 2013 : an update on current recommendations and implementation strategies", Nutr Clin Pract, 29, pp.29~43 (2014)
- Preiser JC, "Metabolic and nutritional support of critically ill patients : consensus and controversies", Crit Care, 19, pp.35~ (2015)
- Taylor BE, "Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.)", Crit Care Med, 44, pp.390~438 (2016)
- Arabi YM, "The intensive care medicine research agenda in nutrition and metabolism", Intensive Care Med, 43, pp.1239~1256 (2017)
- Singer P, "ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit", Clin Nutr, 38, pp.48~79 (2019)
- Braga M, "Early postoperative enteral nutrition improves gut oxygenation and reduces costs compared with total parenteral nutrition", Crit Care Med, 29, pp.242~248 (2001)
- Marik PE, "Early enteral nutrition in acutely ill patients : a systematic review", Crit Care Med, 29, pp.2264~2270 (2001)
- Kudsk KA, "Current aspects of mucosal immunology and its influence by nutrition", Am J Surg, 183, pp.390~398 (2002)
- Gramlich L, "Does enteral nutrition compared to parenteral nutrition result in better outcomes in critically ill adult patients? : a systematic review of the literature", Nutrition, 20, pp.843~848 (2004)
- Marik PE, "Meta-analysis of parenteral nutrition versus enteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis", BMJ, 328, pp.1407~ (2004)
- Artinian V, "Effects of early enteral feeding on the outcome of critically ill mechanically ventilated medical patients", Chest, 129, pp.960~967 (2006)
- Kang W, "Is there evidence that the gut contributes to mucosal immunity in humans?", JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 31, pp.246~258 (2007)
- Doig GS, "Early enteral nutrition, provided within 24 h of injury or intensive care unit admission, significantly reduces mortality in critically ill patients : a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials", Intensive Care Med, 35, pp.2018~2027 (2009)
- Khalid I, "Early enteral nutrition and outcomes of critically ill patients treated with vasopressors and mechanical ventilation", Am J Crit Care, 19, pp.261~268 (2010)
- National Heart, "Initial trophic vs full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury : the EDEN randomized trial", JAMA, 307, pp.795~803 (2012)
- Marik PE, "Normocaloric versus hypocaloric feeding on the outcomes of ICU patients : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Intensive Care Med, 42, pp.316~323 (2016)
- Heyland DK, "Identifying critically ill patients who benefit the most from nutrition therapy : the development and initial validation of a novel risk assessment tool", Crit Care, 15, pp.R268~ (2011)