Sensory change after implant surgery: related factors for recovery
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: This retrospective study aimed to analyze data on nerve damage in patients who complained of sensory changes after dental implant sur-gery, the clinical results according to proximity of the implant fixture to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) canal, and the factors affecting recovery of sensation. Materials and Methods: The electronic medical records of 64 patients who had experienced sensory change after implant surgery were reviewed. Patients were classified by sex, age, implant installation sites, recovery rate and the distance between the implant fixture and IAN canal on computed tomography (CT). The distance was classified into Group I (D>2 mm), Group II (2 mm≥D>0 mm), and Group III (D≤0 mm). Results: The 64 patients were included and the mean age was 57.3±7.3 years. Among the 36 patients who visited our clinic more than two times, 21 patients (58.3%) reported improvement in sensation, 13 patients (36.1%) had no change in sensation, and 2 patients (5.6%) reported worsening sensa-tion. In Group II, symptom improvement was achieved in all patients regardless of the removal of the implant fixture. In Group III, 8 patients (40.0%) had reported symptom improvement with removal of the implant fixture, and 2 patients (33.3%) of recovered patients showed improvement without removal. Removal of the implant fixture in Group III did not result in any significant difference in recovery (P=0.337), although there was a higher possibility of improvement in sensation in removal cases. Conclusion: Clinicians first should consider removing the fixture when it directly invades the IAN canal. However, in cases of sensory change after dental implant surgery where the drill or implant fixture did not invade the IAN canal, other indirect factors such as flap elevation and damage due to anesthesia should be considered as causes of sensory change. Removal of the implant should be considered with caution in these situations.
Abstract
Objectives: This retrospective study aimed to analyze data on nerve damage in patients who complained of sensory changes after dental implant sur-gery, the clinical results according to proximity of the implant fixture to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) canal, and the factors affecting recovery of sensation. Materials and Methods: The electronic medical records of 64 patients who had experienced sensory change after implant surgery were reviewed. Patients were classified by sex, age, implant installation sites, recovery rate and the distance between the implant fixture and IAN canal on computed tomography (CT). The distance was classified into Group I (D>2 mm), Group II (2 mm≥D>0 mm), and Group III (D≤0 mm). Results: The 64 patients were included and the mean age was 57.3±7.3 years. Among the 36 patients who visited our clinic more than two times, 21 patients (58.3%) reported improvement in sensation, 13 patients (36.1%) had no change in sensation, and 2 patients (5.6%) reported worsening sensa-tion. In Group II, symptom improvement was achieved in all patients regardless of the removal of the implant fixture. In Group III, 8 patients (40.0%) had reported symptom improvement with removal of the implant fixture, and 2 patients (33.3%) of recovered patients showed improvement without removal. Removal of the implant fixture in Group III did not result in any significant difference in recovery (P=0.337), although there was a higher possibility of improvement in sensation in removal cases. Conclusion: Clinicians first should consider removing the fixture when it directly invades the IAN canal. However, in cases of sensory change after dental implant surgery where the drill or implant fixture did not invade the IAN canal, other indirect factors such as flap elevation and damage due to anesthesia should be considered as causes of sensory change. Removal of the implant should be considered with caution in these situations.
참고문헌 (22)
- Sarikov R, "Inferior alveolar nerve injury after mandibular third molar extraction : a literature review", J Oral Maxillofac Res, 5, pp.e1~ (2014)[DOI]
- Juodzbalys G, "Inferior alveolar nerve injury associated with implant surgery", Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, pp.183~190 (2013)[DOI]
- López-López J, "Inferior alveolar nerve injury resulting from overextension of an endodontic sealer : non-surgical management using the GABA analogue pregabalin", Int Endod J, 45, pp.98~104 (2012)[DOI]
- Pogrel MA, "Permanent nerve damage from inferior alveolar nerve blocks : a current update", J Calif Dent Assoc, 40, pp.795~797 (2012)
- Phillips C, "Inferior alveolar nerve injury following orthognathic surgery : a review of assessment issues", J Oral Rehabil, 38, pp.547~554 (2011)[DOI]
- Yekta SS, "Analysis of trigeminal nerve disorders after oral and maxillofacial intervention", Head Face Med, 6, pp.24~ (2010)[DOI]
- Pigg M, "Chronic intraoral pain--assessment of diagnostic methods and prognosis", Swed Dent J Suppl, (220), pp.7~91 (2011)
- 최영찬, "하악신경 손상 후 발생한 감각부전 환자들에 대한 분석", Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain, 34(4), pp.379~385 (2009), 대한안면통증∙구강내과학회
- Leung YY, "Treatment modalities of neurosensory deficit after lower third molar surgery : a systematic review", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 70, pp.768~778 (2012)[DOI]
- Kim JW, "Which risk factors are associated with neurosensory deficits of inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular third molar extraction?", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 70, pp.2508~2514 (2012)[DOI]
- Kjølle GK, "Low risk of neurosensory dysfunction after mandibular third molar surgery in patients less than 30 years of age. A prospective study following removal of 1220 mandibular third molars", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 116, pp.411~417 (2013)[DOI]
- 2.0.CO;2,
- Steinberg MJ, "Implant-related nerve injuries", Dent Clin North Am, 59, pp.357~373 (2015)[DOI]
- Greenstein G, "Nerve damage related to implant dentistry : incidence, diagnosis, and management", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 36, pp.652~659 (2015)
- Velasco-Torres M, "Inferior alveolar nerve trajectory, mental foramen location and incidence of mental nerve anterior loop", Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 22, pp.e630~e635 (2017)[DOI]
- Jang SI, "Non-surgical management of inferior alveolar nerve damage after implant installation", J Dent Implant Res, 37, pp.18~22 (2018)[DOI]
- Juodzbalys G, "Injury of the inferior alveolar nerve during implant placement : a literature review", J Oral Maxillofac Res, 2, pp.e1~ (2011)[DOI]
- Greenstein G, "The mental foramen and nerve : clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement : a literature review", J Periodontol, 77, pp.1933~1943 (2006)[DOI]
- Voon YS, "Safe zone in anterior mandible related to the genial tubercle for implant osteotomy in a Chinese-Malaysian population : a CBCT study", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.568~573 (2018)[DOI]
- Helmi MF, "Prevalence of periodontitis and alveolar bone loss in a patient population at Harvard School of Dental Medicine", BMC Oral Health, 19, pp.254~ (2019)[DOI]
- Khawaja N, "Case studies on implant removal influencing the resolution of inferior alveolar nerve injury", Br Dent J, 206, pp.365~370 (2009)[DOI]
- Du Toit J, "Implant injury case series and review of the literature part 1 : inferior alveolar nerve injury", J Oral Implantol, 41, pp.e144~e151 (2015)[DOI]