본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Local Postoperative Complications after Surgery for Intertrochanteric Fractures Using Cephalomedullary Nails

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: Cephalomedullary nails (CMN) are commonly used for the surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. This study aimed to evaluate overall postoperative local complications by reviewing patients who received surgical treatment using three different types of implants. Materials and Methods: The study sample included 353 patients (107 males, 246 females) who underwent surgery using CMN for intertrochanteric fractures. Three different types of implants were used: i) the Gamma3􀋓 (Stryker) in 80 cases, ii) the Targon􀋓 PF (Aesculap) in 225 cases, and iii) the Compression Hip Nail􀋓 (Trademedics) in 48 cases. The mean age was 82.6 (range, 60-109) years and the average follow-up period was 15 (range, 6-80) months. Postoperative local complications and risk factors of cut-out were assessed. Results: The most common complication was cut-out (n=26). Other complications included non-union (n=3), periprosthetic fracture (n=2), avascular necrosis (n=1), heterotopic ossification (n=1), and sleeve pull out (n=1). Multivariate analysis revealed that the cut-out group had a higher rate of poor reduction compared to the noncomplicated group (P<0.001). Although the mean tip-apex distance (TAD) was 18.4 mm in the non-complicated group, lower than that of the cut-out group (P=0.001), multivariate analysis revealed that TAD was not a significant risk factor for cut-out (P=0.065). Conclusion: Cut-out is the most common local complication associated with surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures using CMN. Proper reduction appears to be important in lowering the risk of cut-out. Maintaining low TAD is another critical factor in achieving sufficient fixation of lag screw to the subchondral bone of the femoral head.

Abstract

Purpose: Cephalomedullary nails (CMN) are commonly used for the surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. This study aimed to evaluate overall postoperative local complications by reviewing patients who received surgical treatment using three different types of implants. Materials and Methods: The study sample included 353 patients (107 males, 246 females) who underwent surgery using CMN for intertrochanteric fractures. Three different types of implants were used: i) the Gamma3􀋓 (Stryker) in 80 cases, ii) the Targon􀋓 PF (Aesculap) in 225 cases, and iii) the Compression Hip Nail􀋓 (Trademedics) in 48 cases. The mean age was 82.6 (range, 60-109) years and the average follow-up period was 15 (range, 6-80) months. Postoperative local complications and risk factors of cut-out were assessed. Results: The most common complication was cut-out (n=26). Other complications included non-union (n=3), periprosthetic fracture (n=2), avascular necrosis (n=1), heterotopic ossification (n=1), and sleeve pull out (n=1). Multivariate analysis revealed that the cut-out group had a higher rate of poor reduction compared to the noncomplicated group (P<0.001). Although the mean tip-apex distance (TAD) was 18.4 mm in the non-complicated group, lower than that of the cut-out group (P=0.001), multivariate analysis revealed that TAD was not a significant risk factor for cut-out (P=0.065). Conclusion: Cut-out is the most common local complication associated with surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures using CMN. Proper reduction appears to be important in lowering the risk of cut-out. Maintaining low TAD is another critical factor in achieving sufficient fixation of lag screw to the subchondral bone of the femoral head.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. Anglen JO, "Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice. A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 90, pp.700~707 (2008)[DOI]
  2. 이영균, "National Trends of Surgical Treatment for Intertrochanteric Fractures in Korea", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 28(9), pp.1407~1408 (2013), 대한의학회
  3. Flahiff CM, "A biomechanical evaluation of an intramedullary fixation device for intertrochanteric fractures", J Trauma, 35, pp.23~27 (1993)[DOI]
  4. Lee YK, "Intramedullary nail versus extramedullary plate fixation for unstable intertrochanteric fractures: decision analysis", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 133, pp.961~968 (2013)[DOI]
  5. Socci AR, "Implant options for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: rationale, evidence, and recommendations", Bone Joint J, 99-B, pp.128~133 (2017)[DOI]
  6. Baumgaertner MR, "The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 77, pp.1058~1064 (1995)[DOI]
  7. Gundle R, "How to minimize failures of fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures", Injury, 26, pp.611~614 (1995)[DOI]
  8. Cleveland M, "A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 41-A, pp.1399~1408 (1959)
  9. Fogagnolo F, "Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AOASIF proximal femoral nail", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 124, pp.31~37 (2004)[DOI]
  10. Born CT, "Hip screw migration testing: first results for hip screws and helical blades utilizing a new oscillating test method", J Orthop Res, 29, pp.760~766 (2011)[DOI]
  11. Park BK, "A new addition to the third-generation Gamma nail system", Curr Orthop Pract, 22, pp.280~283 (2011)[DOI]
  12. 박일호, "타곤 근위 대퇴정을 이용한 대퇴골 전자간 골절의 치료", Hip and Pelvis, 24(2), pp.117~123 (2012), 대한고관절학회[DOI]
  13. Parker MJ, "Sliding hip screw versus the Targon PF nail in the treatment of trochanteric fractures of the hip: a randomised trial of 600 fractures", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 94, pp.391~397 (2012)
  14. Choo SK, "Effectiveness of controlled telescoping system for lateral hip pain caused by sliding of blade following intramedullary nailing of trochanteric fracture", Injury, 48, pp.2201~2206 (2017)[DOI]
  15. Geller JA, "Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures", Int Orthop, 34, pp.719~722 (2010)[DOI]
  16. Carr JB, "The anterior and medial reduction of intertrochanteric fractures: a simple method to obtain a stable reduction", J Orthop Trauma, 21, pp.485~489 (2007)[DOI]
  17. 이제민, "Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures Using the Compression Hip Nail", Hip and Pelvis, 26(3), pp.166~172 (2014), 대한고관절학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)