Review of two immunosuppressants: tacrolimus and cyclosporine
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Immunosuppressants are vital in organ transplantation including facial transplantation (FT) but are associated with persistent side effects. This review article was prepared to compare the two most used immunosuppressants, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety and to assess recent trials to mitigate their side effects. PubMed and Google Scholar queries were conducted using combinations of the following search terms: “transplantation immunosuppressant,” “cyclosporine,” “tacrolimus,” “calcineurin inhibitor (CNI),” “efficacy,” “safety,” “induction therapy,” “maintenance therapy,” and “conversion therapy.” Both immunosuppressants inhibit calcineurin and effectively down-regulate cytokines. Tacrolimus may be more advantageous since it lowers the likelihood of acute rejection, has the ability to reverse allograft rejection following cyclosporine treatment, and has the potential to reinnervate nerves. Meanwhile, graft survival rates seem to be comparable for the CNIs. To avoid nephrotoxicity, various immunosuppressants other than CNIs have been studied. Despite averting nephrotoxicity, these medications show increases in acute rejection or other types of adverse effects compared to CNIs. FT has been a topic of interest for oral and maxillofacial surgeons, and the postoperative usage of immunosuppressants is crucial for the long-term prognosis of FT. As contemporary transplantation regimens incorporate novel medications along with CNIs, further research is required.
Abstract
Immunosuppressants are vital in organ transplantation including facial transplantation (FT) but are associated with persistent side effects. This review article was prepared to compare the two most used immunosuppressants, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety and to assess recent trials to mitigate their side effects. PubMed and Google Scholar queries were conducted using combinations of the following search terms: “transplantation immunosuppressant,” “cyclosporine,” “tacrolimus,” “calcineurin inhibitor (CNI),” “efficacy,” “safety,” “induction therapy,” “maintenance therapy,” and “conversion therapy.” Both immunosuppressants inhibit calcineurin and effectively down-regulate cytokines. Tacrolimus may be more advantageous since it lowers the likelihood of acute rejection, has the ability to reverse allograft rejection following cyclosporine treatment, and has the potential to reinnervate nerves. Meanwhile, graft survival rates seem to be comparable for the CNIs. To avoid nephrotoxicity, various immunosuppressants other than CNIs have been studied. Despite averting nephrotoxicity, these medications show increases in acute rejection or other types of adverse effects compared to CNIs. FT has been a topic of interest for oral and maxillofacial surgeons, and the postoperative usage of immunosuppressants is crucial for the long-term prognosis of FT. As contemporary transplantation regimens incorporate novel medications along with CNIs, further research is required.
참고문헌 (90)
- Kirk AD, "Induction immunosuppression", Transplantation, 82, pp.593~602 (2006)[DOI]
- Naesens M, "Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity", Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 4, pp.481~508 (2009)[DOI]
- Matsuda S, "Mechanisms of action of cyclosporine", Immunopharmacology, 47, pp.119~125 (2000)[DOI]
- Walsh CT, "Cyclosporin A, the cyclophilin class of peptidylprolyl isomerases, and blockade of T cell signal transduction", J Biol Chem, 267, pp.13115~13118 (1992)
- Ekberg H, "Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation", N Engl J Med, 357, pp.2562~2575 (2007)[DOI]
- Ponticelli C, "Calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation still needed but in reduced doses : a review", Transplant Proc, 42, pp.2205~2208 (2010)[DOI]
- Murthy MVR, "Cyclosporin-A production by Tolypocladium inflatum using solid state fermentation", Process Biochem, 34, pp.269~280 (1999)[DOI]
- Corbett KM, "Cyclosporin structure and permeability : from A to Z and beyond", J Med Chem, 64, pp.13131~13151 (2021)[DOI]
- Patel D, "Recent advances in cyclosporine drug delivery : challenges and opportunities", Drug Deliv Transl Res, 9, pp.1067~1081 (2019)[DOI]
- Singh AK, "Cyclosporine : a commentary on brand versus generic formulation exchange", J Transplant, 2011, pp.480642~ (2011)[DOI]
- Czogalla A, "Oral cyclosporine A--the current picture of its liposomal and other delivery systems", Cell Mol Biol Lett, 14, pp.139~152 (2009)[DOI]
- Ritschel WA, "Microemulsion technology in the reformulation of cyclosporine : the reason behind the pharmacokinetic properties of Neoral", Clin Transplant, 10, pp.364~373 (1996)
- Gelderblom H, "Cremophor EL : the drawbacks and advantages of vehicle selection for drug formulation", Eur J Cancer, 37, pp.1590~1598 (2001)[DOI]
- Beauchesne PR, "Cyclosporine A : a review of current oral and intravenous delivery systems", Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 33, pp.211~220 (2007)[DOI]
- Kino T, "FK-506, a novel immunosuppressant isolated from a Streptomyces. I. Fermentation, isolation, and physico-chemical and biological characteristics", J Antibiot(Tokyo), 40, pp.1249~1255 (1987)[DOI]
- Zuo KJ, "Systemic and local FK506(tacrolimus)and its application in peripheral nerve surgery", J Hand Surg Am, 45, pp.759~765 (2020)[DOI]
- Dheer D, "Tacrolimus : an updated review on delivering strategies for multifarious diseases", Eur J Pharm Sci, 114, pp.217~227 (2018)[DOI]
- McCormack PL, "Extended-release tacrolimus : a review of its use in de novo kidney transplantation", Drugs, 74, pp.2053~2064 (2014)[DOI]
- Patel P, "Formulation strategies for drug delivery of tacrolimus : an overview", Int J Pharm Investig, 2, pp.169~175 (2012)[DOI]
- Nicolai S, "Hypersensitivity reaction to intravenous but not oral tacrolimus", Transplantation, 94, pp.e61~e63 (2012)[DOI]
- Kang SY, "Intravenous tacrolimus and cyclosporine induced anaphylaxis : what is next?", Asia Pac Allergy, 5, pp.181~186 (2015)[DOI]
- Ali SM, "Polyoxyl 60 hydrogenated castor oil free nanosomal formulation of immunosuppressant tacrolimus : pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability in rodents and humans", Int Immunopharmacol, 10, pp.325~330 (2010)[DOI]
- Moreno Gonzales M, "Sublingual tacrolimus in liver transplantation : a valid option?", Transplant Proc, 48, pp.2102~2106 (2016)[DOI]
- Pennington CA, "Sublingual tacrolimus as an alternative to oral administration for solid organ transplant recipients", Am J Health Syst Pharm, 72, pp.277~284 (2015)[DOI]
- Staatz CE, "Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation", Clin Pharmacokinet, 43, pp.623~653 (2004)[DOI]
- Christians U, "Mechanisms of clinically relevant drug interactions associated with tacrolimus", Clin Pharmacokinet, 41, pp.813~851 (2002)[DOI]
- Hebert MF, "Contributions of hepatic and intestinal metabolism and P-glycoprotein to cyclosporine and tacrolimus oral drug delivery", Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 27, pp.201~214 (1997)[DOI]
- Schutte-Nutgen K, "Tacrolimus-pharmacokinetic considerations for clinicians", Curr Drug Metab, 19, pp.342~350 (2018)[DOI]
- Lindholm A, "Therapeutic monitoring of cyclosporin--an update", Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 41, pp.273~283 (1991)[DOI]
- Möller A, "The disposition of 14C-labeled tacrolimus after intravenous and oral administration in healthy human subjects", Drug Metab Dispos, 27, pp.633~636 (1999)
- Araya AA, "Stat-Pearls" (2023), StatPearls Publishing
- Kung L, "Immunophilins may limit calcineurin inhibition by cyclosporine and tacrolimus at high drug concentrations", Transplantation, 70, pp.327~335 (2000)[DOI]
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, "Sandimmune(cyclosporine)", Novartis Pharmaceuticals, ~ (2020)
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, "Neoral(cyclosporine modified)", Novartis Pharmaceuticals, ~ (2023)
- Busuttil RW, "General guidelines for the use of tacrolimus in adult liver transplant patients", Transplantation, 61, pp.845~847 (1996)[DOI]
- Astellas Pharma, "Prograf(tacrolimus)", Astellas Pharma, ~ (2022)
- Astellas Pharma, "Astagraf XL", Astellas Pharma, ~ (2022)
- McCormack PL, "Tacrolimus : in heart transplant recipients", Drugs, 66, pp.2269~2279 (2006)[DOI]
- Ivulich S, "Clinical challenges of tacrolimus for maintenance immunosuppression post-lung transplantation", Transplant Proc, 49, pp.2153~2160 (2017)[DOI]
- Brunet M, "Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimuspersonalized therapy : second consensus report", Ther Drug Monit, 41, pp.261~307 (2019)[DOI]
- Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, "Envarsus XR", Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, ~ (2020)
- Liu Y, "MAPK phosphatases--regulating the immune response", Nat Rev Immunol, 7, pp.202~212 (2007)[DOI]
- Barbarino JM, "PharmGKB summary : cyclosporine and tacrolimus pathways", Pharmacogenet Genomics, 23, pp.563~585 (2013)[DOI]
- Atsaves V, "AP-1 transcription factors as regulators of immune responses in cancer", Cancers(Basel), 11, pp.1037~ (2019)[DOI]
- Kraaijeveld R, "Inhibition of T helper cell differentiation by tacrolimus or sirolimus results in reduced B-cell activation : effects on T follicular helper cells", Transplant Proc, 51, pp.3463~3473 (2019)[DOI]
- Henry ML, "Cyclosporine and tacrolimus(FK506) : a comparison of efficacy and safety profiles", Clin Transplant, 13, pp.209~220 (1999)[DOI]
- Kamel M, "Tacrolimus confers lower acute rejection rates and better renal allograft survival compared to cyclosporine", World J Transplant, 6, pp.697~702 (2016)[DOI]
- Krämer BK, "Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin A microemulsion in renal transplantation: 2 year follow-up results", Nephrol Dial Transplant, 20, pp.968~973 (2005)[DOI]
- Rath T, "Tacrolimus in transplant rejection", Expert Opin Pharmacother, 14, pp.115~122 (2013)[DOI]
- Felldin M, "Rescue therapy with tacrolimus(FK 506)in renal transplant recipients--a Scandinavian multicenter analysis", Transpl Int, 10, pp.13~18 (1997)[DOI]
- Jiang H, "Tacrolimus and cyclosporine differ in their capacity to overcome ongoing allograft rejection as a result of their differential abilities to inhibit interleukin-10 production", Transplantation, 73, pp.1808~1817 (2002)[DOI]
- Busauschina A, "Cyclosporine nephrotoxicity", Transplant Proc, 36(2 Suppl), pp.229S~233S (2004)[DOI]
- Bentata Y, "Tacrolimus : 20 years of use in adult kidney transplantation. What we should know about its nephrotoxicity", Artif Organs, 44, pp.140~152 (2020)[DOI]
- Mayer AD, "Multicenter randomized trial comparing tacrolimus(FK506)and cyclosporine in the prevention of renal allograft rejection : a report of the European Tacrolimus Multicenter Renal Study Group", Transplantation, 64, pp.436~443 (1997)[DOI]
- Anghel D, "Neurotoxicity of immunosuppressive therapies in organ transplantation", Maedica(Bucur), 8, pp.170~175 (2013)
- Bechstein WO, "Neurotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors : impact and clinical management", Transpl Int, 13, pp.313~326 (2000)[DOI]
- Kälble T, "EAU guidelines on renal transplantation", Eur Urol, 47, pp.156~166 (2005)[DOI]
- Konofaos P, "FK506 and nerve regeneration : past, present, and future", J Reconstr Microsurg, 29, pp.141~148 (2013)[DOI]
- Kim YT, "Cotreatment effect of pulsed electromagnetic field(PEMF)with human dental pulp stromal cells and FK506 on the regeneration of crush injured rat sciatic nerve", Int J Neurosci, 125, pp.774~783 (2015)[DOI]
- Udina E, "Bimodal dose-dependence of FK506 on the rate of axonal regeneration in mouse peripheral nerve", Muscle Nerve, 26, pp.348~355 (2002)[DOI]
- Wang MS, "Comparative dosedependence study of FK506 and cyclosporin A on the rate of axonal regeneration in the rat sciatic nerve", J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 282, pp.1084~1093 (1997)
- Lee M, "FK506 promotes functional recovery in crushed rat sciatic nerve", Muscle Nerve, 23, pp.633~640 (2000)[DOI]
- Seixas SF, "Effect of tacrolimus and cyclosporine immunosuppressants on peripheral nerve regeneration : systematic review and metaanalysis", Rev Bras Ortop(Sao Paulo), 57, pp.207~213 (2022)[DOI]
- Meirer R, "Effect of chronic cyclosporine administration on peripheral nerve regeneration : a dose-response study", Ann Plast Surg, 49, pp.96~103 (2002)[DOI]
- Gold BG, "Immunophilin FK506-binding protein 52(not FK506-binding protein 12)mediates the neurotrophic action of FK506", J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 289, pp.1202~1210 (1999)
- Devauchelle B, "First human face allograft : early report", Lancet, 368, pp.203~209 (2006)[DOI]
- Lantieri L, "Repair of the lower and middle parts of the face by composite tissue allotransplantation in a patient with massive plexiform neurofibroma : a 1-year follow-up study", Lancet, 372, pp.639~645 (2008)[DOI]
- Mele TS, "The use of mycophenolate mofetil in transplant recipients", Immunopharmacology, 47, pp.215~245 (2000)[DOI]
- Kriss M, "Mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy in liver transplant recipients", Clin Transplant, 25, pp.E639~E646 (2011)[DOI]
- Schmeding M, "Mycophenolate mofetil in liver transplantation--is monotherapy safe?", Clin Transplant, 20(Suppl 17), pp.75~79 (2006)[DOI]
- Lassailly G, "Real life experience of mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy in liver transplant patients", Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 45, pp.101451~ (2021)[DOI]
- Webster AC, "Target of rapamycin inhibitors(sirolimus and everolimus)for primary immunosuppression of kidney transplant recipients : a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized trials", Transplantation, 81, pp.1234~1248 (2006)[DOI]
- Moes DJ, "Sirolimus and everolimus in kidney transplantation", Drug Discov Today, 20, pp.1243~1249 (2015)[DOI]
- Jorgenson MR, "Alternatives to immediate release tacrolimus in solid organ transplant recipients : when the gold standard is in short supply", Clin Transplant, 34, pp.e13903~ (2020)[DOI]
- Klawitter J, "Everolimus and sirolimus in transplantation-related but different", Expert Opin Drug Saf, 14, pp.1055~1070 (2015)[DOI]
- Zeng J, "Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients : a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials", Front Immunol, 12, pp.663602~ (2021)[DOI]
- Parlakpinar H, "Transplantation and immunosuppression : a review of novel transplant-related immunosuppressant drugs", Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol, 43, pp.651~665 (2021)[DOI]
- Kimzey AL, "Comprehensive toxicology. Vol. 11. Immune system toxicology", pp.399~427 (2018), Elsevier Science
- Nair V, "Early conversion to belatacept after renal transplantation", Clin Transplant, 31, pp.e12951~ (2017)[DOI]
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, "Belatacept", Bristol-Myers Squibb, ~ (2019)
- El Hennawy H, "Belatacept rescue therapy of CNI-induced nephrotoxicity, meta-analysis", Transplant Rev(Orlando), 35, pp.100653~ (2021)[DOI]
- Budde K, "Conversion from calcineurin inhibitor-to belatacept-based maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients : a randomized phase 3b trial", J Am Soc Nephrol, 32, pp.3252~3264 (2021)[DOI]
- Mannon RB, "Avoidance of CNI and steroids using belatacept-results of the clinical trials in organ transplantation 16 trial", Am J Transplant, 20, pp.3599~3608 (2020)[DOI]
- Grinyó JM, "Safety and efficacy outcomes 3 years after switching to belatacept from a calcineurin inhibitor in kidney transplant recipients : results from a phase 2 randomized trial", Am J Kidney Dis, 69, pp.587~594 (2017)[DOI]
- Jones JW Jr, "Long-term survival of an extremity composite tissue allograft with FK506-mycophenolate mofetil therapy", Surgery, 126, pp.384~388 (1999)
- Pushpakumar SB, "Clinical considerations in face transplantation", Burns, 36, pp.951~958 (2010)[DOI]
- Diep GK, "The 2020 facial transplantation update : a 15-year compendium", Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 9, pp.e3586~ (2021)[DOI]
- Vyas K, "Facial transplantation", Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, 30, pp.255~269 (2022)[DOI]
- Leonard DA, "Immunobiology of face transplantation", J Craniofac Surg, 23, pp.268~271 (2012)[DOI]
- Amini L, "CRISPR-Cas9-edited tacrolimus-resistant antiviral t cells for advanced adoptive immunotherapy in transplant recipients", Mol Ther, 29, pp.32~46 (2021)
