본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일제의 한의학 정책과 조선 지배

Japan’s Oriental Medicine Policy in Colonial Korea

박윤재
대한의사학회 (The Korean Society For The History Of Medicine)|2008.06|의사학 (Korean Journal of Medical History)|제17권 제1호|pp. 75-86

1

조회

0

다운로드

41

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

한약한의학Oriental Medicine의생한약 약국방Oriental Medical HerbUisaeng(Oriental Medicine Practitioner)Oriental Medical Herb Officinal
주제분류역사학

초록

During its colonization of Korea, the Japanese Empire used the Western medicine as a tool for advertising its advanced culture. However, the medical workforce available in Korea was insufficient. The Rule for Uisaeng(Oriental medicine practitioner) was an ordinance decreed in 1913 with a purpose of supplementing the medical workforce. As the Oriental medicine practitioners became official medical workforce, the Japanese Empire could mobilize them in a hygienic administration such as prevention of epidemics. The Uisaengs also tried to adapt themselves to the colonial environment by studying Western medicines. However, the distrust of the Japanese Empire in Oriental medicine continued until 1920s. Manchurian Incident in 1931 brought a change. As the relationship with China aggravated, the provision of medical herb became unstable and the Japanese Empire began to encourage using Oriental medical herb following the Movement for Improving Rural Region Economy. An attempt of the Japanese Empire to utilize the medical herb resulted in a plan to make the Oriental medical herb officinal. The goal was to organize and standardize the Oriental medical herb through a research by the Medical Herb Investigation Committee. However, the medical herb on the table was the one verified by the Western medicine. That is, it was not a traditional medical herb that uses the original theory of Oriental medicine. There was a minority opinion arguing that they should study the Oriental medicine itself. However, that argument was also based on the theory and principles of the Western medicine. Even though an attempt to make full use of Uisaengs expanded as the war continued, the major medical workforce that the Japanese Empire relied on was those trained in Western medicine. In other words, the Japanese Empire did not give a full credit to the Oriental medicine during the colonial era. During the colonization, Japanese Empire used Oriental medicine under the nominal reason of lack of medical workforces. In early 1930s, a policy supporting usage of Oriental medical herb was selected. However, it does not mean that the change in policy encouraged Oriental medicine since the medical herb that the Japanese Empire supported was those that were organized and categorized according to the principles in Western medicine.

Abstract

During its colonization of Korea, the Japanese Empire used the Western medicine as a tool for advertising its advanced culture. However, the medical workforce available in Korea was insufficient. The Rule for Uisaeng(Oriental medicine practitioner) was an ordinance decreed in 1913 with a purpose of supplementing the medical workforce. As the Oriental medicine practitioners became official medical workforce, the Japanese Empire could mobilize them in a hygienic administration such as prevention of epidemics. The Uisaengs also tried to adapt themselves to the colonial environment by studying Western medicines. However, the distrust of the Japanese Empire in Oriental medicine continued until 1920s. Manchurian Incident in 1931 brought a change. As the relationship with China aggravated, the provision of medical herb became unstable and the Japanese Empire began to encourage using Oriental medical herb following the Movement for Improving Rural Region Economy. An attempt of the Japanese Empire to utilize the medical herb resulted in a plan to make the Oriental medical herb officinal. The goal was to organize and standardize the Oriental medical herb through a research by the Medical Herb Investigation Committee. However, the medical herb on the table was the one verified by the Western medicine. That is, it was not a traditional medical herb that uses the original theory of Oriental medicine. There was a minority opinion arguing that they should study the Oriental medicine itself. However, that argument was also based on the theory and principles of the Western medicine. Even though an attempt to make full use of Uisaengs expanded as the war continued, the major medical workforce that the Japanese Empire relied on was those trained in Western medicine. In other words, the Japanese Empire did not give a full credit to the Oriental medicine during the colonial era. During the colonization, Japanese Empire used Oriental medicine under the nominal reason of lack of medical workforces. In early 1930s, a policy supporting usage of Oriental medical herb was selected. However, it does not mean that the change in policy encouraged Oriental medicine since the medical herb that the Japanese Empire supported was those that were organized and categorized according to the principles in Western medicine.

참고문헌 (86)

  1. "삼십년 후의 대경성", 每日申報, ~ (1926)
  2. 박윤재, "한국 근대의학의 기원", pp.314~322 (2005), 혜안
  3. 신동원, "조선총독부의 한의학 정책- 1930년대 이후의 변화를 중심으로 -", 의사학, 12(2), pp.2~128 (2003), 대한의사학회
  4. 여인석, "조선개항 이후 한의의 동태", 동방학지, 104 (1999)
  5. 신동원, "1910년대 일제의 보건의료 정책 - 한의학 정책을 중심으로 -", 한국문화, (30), pp.333~370 (2002), 규장각한국학연구원
  6. 신동원, "조선총독부의 한의학 정책- 1930년대 이후의 변화를 중심으로 -", 의사학, 12(2), pp.2~128 (2003), 대한의사학회
  7. 신창건, "경성제국대학에 있어서 한약연구의 성립", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (76), pp.105~139 (2007), 한국사회사학회
  8. Andrew Cunningham, "Western Medicine as Contested Knowledge", pp.2~3 (1997), Manchester University
  9. "漢藥ノ取締ニ關スル件", 警務彙報, 28, pp.467~ (1912)
  10. "朝鮮衛生要覽", 朝鮮總督府, 37~38 (1929)
  11. 三矢宮松, "축사", 東西醫學(續刊), 1, pp.11~ (1926)
  12. , 東西醫學硏究會月報, 2, pp.47~ (1924)
  13. "朝鮮警察槪要", pp.108~ (1935), 朝鮮總督府 警務局
  14. "漢藥ノ取締ニ關スル件", 警務彙報, 28, pp.467~ (1912)
  15. "漢藥取締ニ關スル件", 警務彙報, 116, pp.46~ (1916)
  16. , 東西醫學硏究會月報, 1, pp.29~ (1923)
  17. "正に是れ一轉機の秋, In 朝鮮總督諭告·訓示集成 3", pp.270~ (2001), 綠蔭書房
  18. "道立醫院長竝慈惠醫院長事務打合會に於ける總督訓示, In 朝鮮總督諭告·訓示集成 3", pp.185~ (2001), 綠蔭書房
  19. "朝鮮統治の一轉機, In 朝鮮總督諭告·訓示集成 2", pp.351~352 (2001), 綠蔭書房
  20. "赤池警務局長口演, In 朝鮮總督諭告·訓示集成 3", pp.368~ (2001), 綠蔭書房
  21. "寺內總督閣下 訓示", 東醫報鑑, 1, pp.3~ (1916)
  22. 윤영태, "동의의 장래", 東西醫學(續刊), 1, pp.7~ (1926)
  23. "한방의계의 혁신", 每日申報, ~ (1921)
  24. "조선의학계와 한방의생", 每日申報, ~ (1921)
  25. 辛圭煥, "竝存과 折衷의 二重奏: 日帝下 韓醫學의 西洋醫學 認識과 受容", 歷史敎育, 101, pp.240~247 (2007)
  26. 吉木彌三, "朝鮮産漢藥の狀況", 朝鮮及滿洲, 147, pp.70~ (1919)
  27. "道警察部長會議に於ける警務局長演示, In 朝鮮總督諭告·訓示集成 5", pp.599~ (2001), 綠蔭書房
  28. 역사학연구소, "함께 보는 한국근현대사", pp.200~ (2004), 서해문집
  29. "휘보 - 약초재배상황", 조선, 12, pp.134~ (1933)
  30. "한약초를 재배함에 적당한 조선풍토", 每日申報, ~ (1933)
  31. "십삼만원의 경비들어 개성에 한약연구소", 每日申報, ~ (1936)
  32. 신창건, "경성제국대학에 있어서 한약연구의 성립", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (76), pp.105~139 (2007), 한국사회사학회
  33. "무책임한 매약(賣藥)", 每日申報, ~ (1927)
  34. "함남위생과 주최 약초 한약전람회", 每日申報, ~ (1933)
  35. "開城に藥都建設", 京城日報, ~ (1935)
  36. "개성 약초원 개장", 朝鮮中央日報, ~ (1936)
  37. "재판화학부와 한약부신설", 每日申報, ~ (1937)
  38. "한방의는 한방의로서", 每日申報, ~ (1932)
  39. "위생강습회", 東亞日報, ~ (1933)
  40. "전조선 초유계획인 한방의학강습회", 每日申報, ~ (1932)
  41. "전염병원 순화원에 한방의약부 신설", 每日申報, ~ (1930)
  42. "한방의약의 개신", 每日申報, ~ (1914)
  43. "警察部長會議の訓示, In 朝鮮總督諭告·訓示集成 6", pp.255~ (2001), 綠蔭書房
  44. 西龜三圭, "동양의약부흥의 시국적 의의", 東洋醫藥, 1, pp.18~ (1939)
  45. 衫原德行, "漢方醫學想念に就て, In 大陸文化硏究", pp.390~ (1940), 岩波書店
  46. "성대의 한방약 연구", 每日申報, ~ (1941)
  47. 杉原德行, "漢方醫學の科學的檢討", 朝鮮及滿洲, 374, pp.43~ (1939)
  48. "동양의약협회 창립취지서", 東洋醫藥, 1, pp.11~ (1939)
  49. "약초원 낙성", 東亞日報, ~ (1938)
  50. "城大藥草硏究所 開城에 設置", 東亞日報, ~ (1937)
  51. "城大の藥草園", 京城日報, ~ (1936)
  52. "신길구(申佶求). 회고일년", 東洋醫藥, 6, pp.2~ (1939)
  53. 趙憲泳, "肺病의 漢方治療法", 新東亞, 12, pp.214~ (1935)
  54. "七月二十一日の定例局長會議, In 朝鮮總督諭告·訓示集成 6", pp.45~ (2001), 綠蔭書房
  55. "한약에 시대의 각광", 每日申報, ~ (1941)
  56. "한약재의 재검토", 每日申報, ~ (1939)
  57. "各道警察部長會議意見希望事項", pp.83~84 (1937), 朝鮮總督府
  58. "당국에 전문가 두고", 每日申報, ~ (1936)
  59. "한방약의 신비연구", 每日申報, ~ (1941)
  60. "한약개발 5년계획", 每日申報, ~ (1938)
  61. 西龜三圭, "동양의약부흥의 시국적 의의", 東洋醫藥, 1, pp.18~ (1939)
  62. "한약을 재인식", 每日申報, ~ (1939)
  63. "오개년 계속사업으로 한약 약국방을 제정", 每日申報, ~ (1937)
  64. "漢藥調査會議", 東亞日報, ~ (1937)
  65. "한약도 약국방 제정", 每日申報, ~ (1938)
  66. "한약재에 과학의 메스", 東亞日報, ~ (1938)
  67. "구십칠종이 완전", 每日申報, ~ (1939)
  68. "한약에 시대의 각광", 每日申報, ~ (1943)
  69. 신동원, "조선총독부의 한의학 정책- 1930년대 이후의 변화를 중심으로 -", 의사학, 12(2), pp.2~128 (2003), 대한의사학회
  70. "한약재에 새분석", 每日申報, ~ (1941)
  71. 川口利一, "朝鮮漢藥局方(一)", 東洋醫藥, 2, pp.54~56 (1939)
  72. "한방약의 신비연구", 每日申報, ~ (1941)
  73. "반도산 한약재 85종", 每日申報, ~ (1939)
  74. 衫原德行, "朝鮮に於ける漢方醫學と傷寒論", 朝鮮, 9 (1939)
  75. 박윤재, "1930~1940년대 조헌영의 한의학 인식과 동서절충적 의학론", 한국근현대사연구, (40), pp.118~139 (2007), 한국근현대사학회
  76. 趙憲泳, "洋醫學徒의 한방의학관", 東洋醫藥, 3, pp.23~ (1939)
  77. 김명여, "의료제도개선안에 대하여", 東洋醫藥, 5, pp.2~ (1939)
  78. 杉原德行, "漢方醫學の科學的檢討", 朝鮮及滿洲, 374, pp.42~43 (1939)
  79. 현호섭, "동양의약협회의 사명", 東洋醫藥, 1, pp.33~ (1939)
  80. 현호섭, "한방의약계의 전도", 東洋醫藥, 1, pp.45~ (1939)
  81. "공의를 대증원", 每日申報, ~ (1936)
  82. "경기도에 의생강습소", 漢方醫藥, 12, pp.69~ (1937)
  83. "제오회 의학강습회 개최", 漢方醫藥, 44, pp.43~ (1942)
  84. "朝鮮總督府 帝國議會說明資料 8", pp.164~ (1994), 不二出版
  85. "朝鮮に於ける醫師と醫生", 朝鮮行政, 2, pp.109~ (1942)
  86. "醫療關係者 徵用令", 朝鮮總督府官報, ~ (1942)

관련 논문AI추천

전시체제기 일제 한의학 정책의 변화 -제국적 연관의 시각을 중심으로-황영원동북아시아문화학회 · 동북아 문화연구2023 · 제1권 제77호조선총독부의 한의학 정책 - 1930년대 이후의 변화를 중심으로 -신동원대한의사학회 · 의사학2003 · 제12권 제2호“Medicine of the Grassroots”: Korean Herbal Medicine Industry and Consumption during the Japanese Colonial Period황영원대한의사학회 · 의사학2020 · 제29권 제1호일제시기 한의학 교육과 전통 한의학의 변모 -한의학 강습소를 중심으로-황영원대한의사학회 · 의사학2018 · 제27권 제1호20세기 초 한의원 개량론김성수의학사연구소 · 연세의사학2019 · 제22권 제1호가려진 의생단체의 모습 ― 일제시기 동서의학연구회를 다시 보다 ―황영원수선사학회 · 사림2017 · 제59호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

헬레니즘 시대 의술에서 보이는 이질적 경향 - 다양성 대(對) 획일성, 시간적 지연(자연성) 대 신속성(효율성),인술(仁術) 대 세속적 성공의 대립 -최자영pp. 1-21內醫院字本硏究의 諸問題 -『東醫寶鑑』硏究를 위한 先行課題-하정용pp. 23-36보구여관(保救女館)의 설립과 활동이방원pp. 37-55세브란스 정신과의 설립과정과 인도주의적 치료전통의 형성 -맥라렌과 이중철의 활동을 중심으로여인석pp. 57-74주현측(朱賢則)의 생애와 활동홍정완, 박형우pp. 87-98
원문 보기