본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선 후기 성별에 따른 자살의 해석- 正祖代(審理錄)의 자살 관련 사건을 중심으로

The Interpretation of Suicide by Gender in Late Joseon Dynasty: around cases of suicide in (Trial Document(審理錄))

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This paper focuses on cases of suicide in ≪Trial Document(審理錄; Simrirok)≫ which was published in Jeongjo(正祖)'s reign, and how to understand suicide cases in social context. Even though ≪Trial Document≫ is limited historical material to report for King, it is very useful to examine not only suicide case of those times but also the elite's recognition about suicide. Especially in this paper, the important point is not ‘why and how did a suicide kill himself or herself' but ‘how people did understand about suicide or a suicide'. In other words, the key point of this paper is ‘discourse' of suicide. There are so multifarious suicide cases in ≪Trial Document≫ and the reasons of suicide are also multifarious. However, ≪Trial Document≫ is worthy of note because it is the document which was recorded trial processes. In these processes, decision on ‘suicide or murder' was the most essential point. So there were arguments on discerning whether a victim committed suicide or a murderer counterfeited a victim's suicide. The important thing was not only real evidence in these arguments. Belief, 'it is acceptable reason for suicide', was very important as a social context. One of the important criterions was ‘gender' to Jeoseon's elite. In spite of cases' similarities, the interpretation was completely different by gender. Men's suicide was understood as ‘a foolish act' by the elite because they thought that 'normal man' would not commit suicide. Moreover, there were particular women's suicide cases which could not happen to men. The reason of these suicides was ’chastity'. The cases were also ‘interpreted' by the people alive. These interpretation was based on the value judgement. And another important criterion was class. The elite had given a prize(旌門) to the women who suicided directly after their husbands' death. The elite themselves, however, did not suicide so much as the common people did. This contradiction shows that suicide is not a personal choice absolutely. This paper searches into the meaning of suicide in late Joseon society, and look into ‘gender' as the most important criterion of judgement.

Abstract

This paper focuses on cases of suicide in ≪Trial Document(審理錄; Simrirok)≫ which was published in Jeongjo(正祖)'s reign, and how to understand suicide cases in social context. Even though ≪Trial Document≫ is limited historical material to report for King, it is very useful to examine not only suicide case of those times but also the elite's recognition about suicide. Especially in this paper, the important point is not ‘why and how did a suicide kill himself or herself' but ‘how people did understand about suicide or a suicide'. In other words, the key point of this paper is ‘discourse' of suicide. There are so multifarious suicide cases in ≪Trial Document≫ and the reasons of suicide are also multifarious. However, ≪Trial Document≫ is worthy of note because it is the document which was recorded trial processes. In these processes, decision on ‘suicide or murder' was the most essential point. So there were arguments on discerning whether a victim committed suicide or a murderer counterfeited a victim's suicide. The important thing was not only real evidence in these arguments. Belief, 'it is acceptable reason for suicide', was very important as a social context. One of the important criterions was ‘gender' to Jeoseon's elite. In spite of cases' similarities, the interpretation was completely different by gender. Men's suicide was understood as ‘a foolish act' by the elite because they thought that 'normal man' would not commit suicide. Moreover, there were particular women's suicide cases which could not happen to men. The reason of these suicides was ’chastity'. The cases were also ‘interpreted' by the people alive. These interpretation was based on the value judgement. And another important criterion was class. The elite had given a prize(旌門) to the women who suicided directly after their husbands' death. The elite themselves, however, did not suicide so much as the common people did. This contradiction shows that suicide is not a personal choice absolutely. This paper searches into the meaning of suicide in late Joseon society, and look into ‘gender' as the most important criterion of judgement.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 천선영, "자살의 이유를 알아야 하는 이유:근대적 자살 이해에 대한 사회이론적 논의", 사회와 이론, (12), pp.293~326 (2008), 한국이론사회학회
  2. 에밀 뒤르켐, "자살론" (1994), 청아출판사
  3. 오진탁, "자살, 세상에서 가장 불행한 죽음", pp.25~34 (2008), 세종서적
  4. 홍성철, "사회계층이 자살 사망 위험도에 미치는 영향", 보건과 사회과학, 14, pp.249~271 (2003), 한국보건사회학회
  5. 신동준, "살인과 자살의 문화적 사회구조적 원인", 한국사회학, 38(4), pp.33~71 (2004), 한국사회학회
  6. 송태정, "자살, 이혼, 범죄. 그리고 경제" (2005), LG경제연구원
  7. 은기수, "경제적 양극화와 자살의 상관성: 1997년 외환위기를 전후하여", 한국인구학, 28(2), pp.97~129 (2005), 한국인구학회
  8. 오진경, "우리나라 성인 자살자의 인구사회적 특성", 보건과 사회과학, 18 (2005)
  9. 노용환, "자살위험의 미시적 결정요인 분석", 보건경제와 정책연구, 13(1), pp.41~58 (2007), 한국보건경제정책학회
  10. 박은옥, "우리나라 시ㆍ도별 자살 사망 분석", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 37(1), pp.44~51 (2007), 한국간호과학회
  11. 이홍식, "자살의 이해와 예방" (2008), 학지사
  12. 권연웅, "심리록의 기초적 검토-정조대의 사죄판결, In 이기백선생 고희기념 한국사학논총 下" (1994), 일조각
  13. 조윤선, "조선후기 법사학 연구의 현황. 조선후기사 연구의 현황과 과제" (2000), 창작과비평사
  14. 심재우, "『審理錄』을 통해 본 18세기 후반 서울의 범죄상", 서울학연구, 17 (2001), 서울학연구소
  15. 이수옥, "조선 후기 여성과 범죄-18세기 『審理錄』의 사례 분석을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2002
  16. 김선경, "조선 후기 여성의 성, 감시와 처벌", 역사연구, 8 (2000)
  17. 田汝康, "공자의 이름으로 죽은 여인들" (1999), 예문서원
  18. 박병호, "심리록 해제, In 국역 《審理錄》", pp.1~ (2000), 민족문화추진회
  19. 김호, "해제:『신주무원록』과 조선 전기의 검시, In 신주무원록", pp.13~41 (2003), 사계절
  20. 장윤희, "《增修無寃錄諺解》의 자료적 특성과 언어, In 역주 증수무원록언해", pp.537~553 (2004), 서울대학교출판부
  21. 토마스 브로니쉬, "자살", pp.34~ (2002), 이끌리오
  22. 정일영, "광해군대 『東國新續三綱行實圖』 연구", 석사, 사학과, pp.2008
  23. 한국고전여성문학회, "조선시대의 열녀담론" (2002), 월인
  24. 임유경, "이옥의 열녀전 서술방식과 열 관념, In 조선시대의 열녀담론" (2002), 월인

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)