1910-20년대 개성상인의 백삼(白蔘) 상품화와 판매 확대 활동
White Ginseng Commercialization and Sales Expansion Activities of Gaesung Merchants in the 1910s and 1920s
0
조회
0
다운로드
17
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Ginseng has always been the typical export item in Korean history. Until the 18th century, exporting ginseng was wild ginseng from the mountains. Since the 19th century, exporting ginseng became red ginseng, which was red due to steaming and drying process. Red ginseng was produced by Gaesung merchants, so that these merchants were able to gain the control of the output. Gaesung merchants of the 19th century exported red ginseng to China and made huge economic success. However, when the Korean Empire and Japanese colonical government established red ginseng monopoly, it essentially blocked Gaesung traders from manufacturing and exporting any further of its prized commodity. Then, the traders turned to sun-dried white ginseng as a substitute to red ginseng. As a result, white ginseng production dramatically increased after 1914, which in turn made Gaesung merchants newly aware of the commercial value of white ginseng, which was previously ignored. The traders made good use of the traditional medicine herb market, which opened annually, to promote the expansion of white ginseng sales. Moreover, the merchants also adopted modern marketing techniques, as they founded companies to handle solely white ginseng sales, refreshed packaging to raise commodity values, and made an effort in advertising and mail order sales. Due to such endeavors, demand for white ginseng grew exponentially both in domestic and foreign markets, which generated steady growth of white ginseng prices despite the rapid increase of its supply. This phenomenon naturally brought about the rich economic accomplishments of Gaesung merchants. Through the white ginseng sales activities of Gaesung merchants in post-1910s era, two facts can be newly uncovered. First, the mass consumption of white ginseng today in Korean society took a full-scale step after the 1910s. Second, it was a widely-held view that during the Japanese rule,majority of Korean traditional merchants were economically ruined, while a small minority collaborated with the colonical government to obtain economic success. However, Gaesung merchants in 1910s successfully commercialized white ginseng not with the aid of the Japanese but with their own efforts alone. Such fact reveals that there were other types of traditional merchants during the Japanese colonial period who cannot be explained with the common theory.
Abstract
Ginseng has always been the typical export item in Korean history. Until the 18th century, exporting ginseng was wild ginseng from the mountains. Since the 19th century, exporting ginseng became red ginseng, which was red due to steaming and drying process. Red ginseng was produced by Gaesung merchants, so that these merchants were able to gain the control of the output. Gaesung merchants of the 19th century exported red ginseng to China and made huge economic success. However, when the Korean Empire and Japanese colonical government established red ginseng monopoly, it essentially blocked Gaesung traders from manufacturing and exporting any further of its prized commodity. Then, the traders turned to sun-dried white ginseng as a substitute to red ginseng. As a result, white ginseng production dramatically increased after 1914, which in turn made Gaesung merchants newly aware of the commercial value of white ginseng, which was previously ignored. The traders made good use of the traditional medicine herb market, which opened annually, to promote the expansion of white ginseng sales. Moreover, the merchants also adopted modern marketing techniques, as they founded companies to handle solely white ginseng sales, refreshed packaging to raise commodity values, and made an effort in advertising and mail order sales. Due to such endeavors, demand for white ginseng grew exponentially both in domestic and foreign markets, which generated steady growth of white ginseng prices despite the rapid increase of its supply. This phenomenon naturally brought about the rich economic accomplishments of Gaesung merchants. Through the white ginseng sales activities of Gaesung merchants in post-1910s era, two facts can be newly uncovered. First, the mass consumption of white ginseng today in Korean society took a full-scale step after the 1910s. Second, it was a widely-held view that during the Japanese rule,majority of Korean traditional merchants were economically ruined, while a small minority collaborated with the colonical government to obtain economic success. However, Gaesung merchants in 1910s successfully commercialized white ginseng not with the aid of the Japanese but with their own efforts alone. Such fact reveals that there were other types of traditional merchants during the Japanese colonial period who cannot be explained with the common theory.
참고문헌 (26)
- "擇里志", ~
- "半島時論", ~
- "每日新報", ~
- "東亞日報", ~
- "朝鮮日報", ~
- "朝鮮總督府官報", ~
- 中村資良, "朝鮮銀行會社要錄" (1921), 東亞經濟時報社
- 崔文鎭, "開城人蔘開拓小史" (1940), 朝鮮産業硏究會
- 姜萬吉, "開城商人硏究-朝鮮後期 商業資本의 成長", 韓國史硏究, 8 (1972)
- 강진아, "16-19세기 동아시아 무역권의 세계사적 변용, In 동아시아의 지역질서" (2005), 창비
- 金廷美, "朝鮮後期 對淸貿易의 展開와 貿易收稅制의 시행", 韓國史論, 36 (1996)
- 양정필, "19세기-20세기초 開城商人의 蔘業資本 硏究", 석사, 사학과, pp.2001
- 양정필, "근현대 개성상인의 경제조직 시론 —3대 상업제도와 3대 사업부문을 중심으로—", 역사문제연구, 12(2), pp.51~98 (2008), 역사문제연구소
- 양정필, "1910년대 일제의 蔘業정책과 개성 蔘圃主의 활동", 역사문제연구, 14(2), pp.265~297 (2010), 역사문제연구소
- 柳承宙, "朝鮮後期 對淸貿易의 展開過程-17^8世紀 赴燕譯官의 貿易活動을 中心으로", 白山學報, 8 (1970)
- 이승렬, "日帝强占初期(1906-1919)大韓天一(朝鮮商業)銀行과 京仁地域 商工人", 역사문제연구, 8 (2000)
- 李哲成, "19세기 前半 蔘圃貿易 전개 과정과 西路商人", 東西史學, 5 (1999)
- 李哲成, "朝鮮後期 對淸貿易史 硏究" (2000), 國學資料院
- 정병욱, "1910년대 韓一銀行과 서울의 商人", 서울학연구, 12 (1999)
- 정성일, "朝鮮後期 對日貿易" (2000), 신서원
- 전우용, "1910년대 객주 통제와 ‘朝鮮會社令’", 역사문제연구, 2 (1997)
- 전우용, "근대 이행기(1894-1919) 서울 시전상업의 변화", 서울학연구, (22), pp.29~66 (2004), 서울학연구소
- 車守正, "朝鮮後期 人蔘貿易의 展開過程", 北岳史論, 1 (1989)
- 홍성찬, "韓末·日帝下의 서울 鐘路商人 硏究-布木商 金泰熙家의 ‘壽南商會’ 運營을 중심으로", 동방학지, (116), pp.217~268 (2002), 국학연구원
- 홍성찬, "한말 일제초 서울 鐘路商人의 일상활동- 布木商 金泰熙 家의 사례를 중심으로", 동방학지, (133), pp.115~172 (2006), 국학연구원
- 홍희유, "17세기 이후 인삼재배의 발전과 자본주의적 삼포경영", 력사과학, 3 (1986)
