국내 특성을 반영한 e-Discovery 대응절차
Effective Domestic e-Discovery Procedures
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
오늘날 많은 국내 기업들이 미국 시장에 진출하여 해외사업을 확장함에 따라 미국 기업들과의 소송에 직면하는 경우가 빈번해지고 있으며 이에 대해 체계적으로 대응할 수 있도록 e-Discovery에 대한 준비가 필요하다. 아직 우리나라에 e-Discovery 제도가 확립되지는 않았지만 국내 기업들은 몇몇 대기업들의 소송 사례들을 계기로 e-Discovery에대한 관심이 높아지고 있으며 그에 대한 대응방법 등을 모색하고 있는 실정이다. 미국의 e-Discovery 제도를 우리나라에서 실행할 시 고려해야 할 부분은 크게 세 가지로, 법률 차이, 기업 시스템 차이, 그리고 언어와 기업문화 차이가있다. 본 논문에서는 실무를 바탕으로 국내 기업들이 미국소송에 대응하는 데 있어서의 문제점들을 도출하여 그것들을효과적으로 극복할 수 있는 특화된 e-Discovery 절차와 과정을 제안하려고 한다.
Abstract
Today, many domestic companies often face the lawsuits from the U.S. companies as they expand their business in the U.S. market and it is necessary for the domestic companies to prepare for the e-Discovery process in the systematic manner. Yet, the e-discovery system has not been properly established in Korea, however, domestic companies are growing more and more interests in e-Discovery processes and procedures so that they are seeking for the appropriate actions that they should take when facing lawsuits. When adopting the e-Discovery system in Korea, there are three main considerations including the differences in laws and regulations, enterprise system and language and company culture. This study aims to draw the problems for the Korean domestic companies in responding the U.S. lawsuits and to suggest the specialized e-discovery processes and procedures to effectively overcome them.
참고문헌 (38)
- 변진석, "미국 민사소송에서 증거개시의 역할과 한계, 한국에 도입가능성", 미국헌법연구, 23(3), pp.129~162 (2012), 미국헌법학회
- 전복만, "지식재산분쟁에서 중재제도 활성화를 위한 전자증거개시제도의 정비", 과학기술법연구, 18(3), pp.367~402 (2012), 과학기술법연구원
- Where the money goes: understanding litigation expenditures for producing electronic discovery, "Nicholas M. Pace", A RAND Law, Business, and Regulation Institute, ~ (2012)
- Reviewing document security solutions for the internal information security, "Security World", ~ (2009)
- ‘Groupware? ERP? DW? CRM’ Major Corporation Solution Market Trend, , KRG Annual Report, ~ (2002)
- Karen Schuler, "E-discovery: creating and managing an enterprisewide program" (2008), Syngress
- Multilingual e-disclosure: options, obstacles and opportunities report, "Kroll Ontrack", ~ (2014)
- Wayne Wong, "Six practical tips for eDiscovery in Asia and the Pacific", Inside Counsel, ~ (2012)
- Gyugon Cho, "Implementing enterprise DRM", Journal of The Korean Institution of Information Scientists and Engineers, 23(8), pp.31~36 (2005)
- 이동찬, "데이터베이스 시스템에서 디지털 포렌식 조사를 위한 체계적인 데이터 추출 기법 연구", 정보보호학회논문지, 22(3), pp.565~573 (2012), 한국정보보호학회
- A project of the Sedona Conference Working Group on electronic document retention & production(WG1), "Database Principles : addressing the preservation and production of database and database information in civil litigation", The Sedona ConferenceⓇ (2014)
- Suzanne Herrmann Brock, "DuPont v. Kolon : a lesson in how to avoid sanctions for spoliation of evidence", E-Discovery Law Alert, ~ (2011)
- Daryl Shetterly, "The world is flat: handling foreign language documents in e-discovery projects", LexisNexisⓇ Legal Newsroom, ~ (2011)
- John T. Philips, "Implementing litigation readiness principles and practices", ARMA International Educational Foundation, ~ (2012)
- Michael D. Berman, "Managing e-discovery and ESI from pre-litigation through trial", Americal Bar Association, ~ (2011)
- Sally A. Kane, "Breaking into e-Discovery", Law Practice Today, ~ (2012)
- A project of the Sedona Conference Working Group 7, "The Sedona Canada commentary on practical approaches for cost containment : best practices for managing the preservation, collection, processing, review & analysis of electronically stored information", The Sedona ConferenceⓇ (2011)
- Stephanie F. Stacy, "Litigation holds : ten tips in ten minutes", Baylor, Evnen, Curtiss, Gimit & Witt, LLP, ~ (2010)
- A project of the Sedona Conference Working Group on best practices for electronic document retention & production, "The Sedona guidelines, best practice guidelines & commentary for managing information & records in the electronic age", The Sedona ConferenceⓇ, ~ (2007)
- Patricia E. Antezana, "ESI preservation in employment litigation: counsel s guide to new FRCP ediscovery amendments", Park Jensen Bennett LLP & Reed Smith LLP
- Nicholas Panarella, "Implementing a litigation hold", Kelley Drye LLP, ~ (2012)
- Legal Update, "Litigation law alert : litigation holds", Stoel Rives LLP, ~ (2011)
- Akers, S., "An intelligent approach to e-Discovery", University of Maryland, ~ (2011)
- Cory Doctorow, "Microsoft research DRM talk", Microsoft Research Group, ~ (2004)
- Erik Hammerquist, "Understanding remote collections for e-discovery : benefits, pitfalls and use cases(part 2) : remote collections can be less time consuming and less intrusive than on-site collections", Inside Council, ~ (2014)
- Conrad Jacoby, "Database lie! successfully managing structured data, the OFT-overlooked ESI", Richmond Journal of Law &Technology, XIX(3) (2013)
- Craig Ball, "Beyond data about data: The litigator’s guide to metadata", ~ (2011)
- Gregory Schodde, "E-Discovery : collect metadata to avoid ESI headaches", Inside Counsel, ~ (2012)
- Chris Pavan, "Overcoming data encryption for forensic imaging and collections, litigation support:document forensics and legal holds", ILTA White Paper, ~ (2009)
- Gregory L Fordham, "Eleven steps to designing an e-Discovery plan and protocol : a systems engineering approach to modern litigation", Fordham Forensics, ~ (2015)
- Alan M. Anderson, "Issuing and manag ing litigation-hold notices", Bench & Bar of Minnesota, ~ (2007)
- A project of the Sedona Conference Working Group on electronic document retention & production(WG1), "Commentary on legal holds : the trigger & the process", The Sedona ConferenceⓇ, ~ (2010)
- Staff Writer, "Trials and translation", Inside Counsel, ~ (2009)
- Shira A. Scheindlin, "Electronic discovery and digital evidence: cases and materials", West, ~ (2012)
- Wall Street Journal, "Wanted: temp attorneys with foreign language skills", Wall Street Journal, ~ (2012)
- David Degnan, "Accounting for the costs of electronic discovery", Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 12(1) (2011)
- ServientTM, "Predictive review: practical uses of active learning technology to improve the quality of e-Discovery and control costs", ServientTM, ~ (2010)
