Gender Perspectives on the Relationship between Red and Processed Meat Intake and Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background:Men and women choose different food items, and consume different amounts of food, due to biological, cultural, and social differences. However, when dietary assessment instruments are developed, gender differences in food selection and/or the portion sizes are often not considered. Methods:Prospective cohort studies with men and women that examined the association between red or processed meat intake and colorectal cancer and published up to July 2017, were identified using PubMed. Studies were categorized as gender-specific (GS) group if the Food Frequency Questionnaire was developed using gender-specific data, and as not gender-specific (NGS) group if not gender-specific data were used. Results:For cohort studies that reported combined intake estimates of men and women, a 100 g/day increment in red and processed meat intake was positively associated with a risk of colorectal or colon cancer in GS group (relative risk [RR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.32) but not in NGS group (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.90-1.35). For processed meat, the RR for 50 g/day increase was 1.28 (95% CI, 1.15-1.40) in GS group and 1.15 (95% CI, 1.03-1.27) in NGS group. Conclusions:Gender differences need to be considered during development of dietary assessment tools because this may improve the quality of the findings of nutritional epidemiological studies.
Abstract
Background:Men and women choose different food items, and consume different amounts of food, due to biological, cultural, and social differences. However, when dietary assessment instruments are developed, gender differences in food selection and/or the portion sizes are often not considered. Methods:Prospective cohort studies with men and women that examined the association between red or processed meat intake and colorectal cancer and published up to July 2017, were identified using PubMed. Studies were categorized as gender-specific (GS) group if the Food Frequency Questionnaire was developed using gender-specific data, and as not gender-specific (NGS) group if not gender-specific data were used. Results:For cohort studies that reported combined intake estimates of men and women, a 100 g/day increment in red and processed meat intake was positively associated with a risk of colorectal or colon cancer in GS group (relative risk [RR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.32) but not in NGS group (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.90-1.35). For processed meat, the RR for 50 g/day increase was 1.28 (95% CI, 1.15-1.40) in GS group and 1.15 (95% CI, 1.03-1.27) in NGS group. Conclusions:Gender differences need to be considered during development of dietary assessment tools because this may improve the quality of the findings of nutritional epidemiological studies.
참고문헌 (35)
- [URL]
- Schiebinger L, "Interdisciplinary approaches to achieving gendered innovations in science, medicine, and engineering", Interdiscip Sci Rev, 36(2), pp.154~167 (2011)
- Bates CJ, "Gender differences in food and nutrient intakes and status indices from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey of people aged 65 years and over", Eur J Clin Nutr, 53(9), pp.694~699 (1999)
- Wardle J, "Gender differences in food choice: the contribution of health beliefs and dieting", Ann Behav Med, 27(2), pp.107~116 (2004)
- Turrell G, "Determinants of gender differences in dietary behavior", Nutr Res, 17(7), pp.1105~1120 (1997)
- Brug J, "Taste preferences, liking and other factors related to fruit and vegetable intakes among schoolchildren: results from observational studies", Br J Nutr, 99(Suppl 1), pp.S7~S14 (2008)
- Blaak E, "Gender differences in fat metabolism", Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care, 4(6), pp.499~502 (2001)
- Tarnopolsky MA, "Females and males: should nutritional recommendations be gender specific?", Schweiz Z Med Traumatol, 51(1), pp.39~46 (2003)
- Wu BN, "Sex differences in energy metabolism need to be considered with lifestyle modifications in humans", J Nutr Metab, 2011, pp.391809~ (2011)
- Lee H, "Gender analysis in the development and validation of FFQ: a systematic review", Br J Nutr, 115(4), pp.666~671 (2016)
- Willett W, "Nutritional epidemiology", pp.70~141 (2012), Oxford University Press
- Bouvard V, "Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat", Lancet Oncol, 16(16), pp.1599~1600 (2015)
- Stroup DF, "Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group", JAMA, 283(15), pp.2008~2012 (2000)
- Sato Y, "Meat consumption and risk of colorectal cancer in Japan: the Miyagi cohort study", Eur J Cancer Prev, 15(3), pp.211~218 (2006)
- DerSimonian R, "Meta-analysis in clinical trials", Control Clin Trials, 7(3), pp.177~188 (1986)
- Orsini N, "Generalized least squares for trend estimation of summarized dose-response data", Stata J, 6(1), pp.40~57 (2006)
- Chan DS, "Red and processed meat and colorectal cancer incidence: meta-analysis of prospective studies", PLoS One, 6(6), pp.e20456~ (2011)
- Kang M, "Portion sizes from 24-hour dietary recalls differed by sex among those who selected the same portion size category on a food frequency questionnaire", J Acad of Nutr Diet, 118(9), pp.1711~1718 (2018)
- Marks GC, "The effect of personal characteristics on the validity of nutrient intake estimates using a food-frequency questionnaire", Public Health Nutr, 9(3), pp.394~402 (2006)
- Marks GC, "Relative validity of food intake estimates using a food frequency questionnaire is associated with sex, age, and other personal characteristics", J Nutr, 136(2), pp.459~465 (2006)
- Cade JE, "Food-frequency questionnaires: a review of their design, validation and utilisation", Nutr Res Rev, 17(1), pp.5~22 (2004)
- Berndt SI, "Genetic variation in the nucleotide excision repair pathway and colorectal cancer risk", Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 15(11), pp.2263~2269 (2006)
- Chao A, "Meat consumption and risk of colorectal cancer", JAMA, 293(2), pp.172~182 (2005)
- Takachi R, "Red meat intake may increase the risk of colon cancer in Japanese, a population with relatively low red meat consumption", Asia Pac J Clin Nutr, 20(4), pp.603~612 (2011)
- English DR, "Red meat, chicken, and fish consumption and risk of colorectal cancer", Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 13(9), pp.1509~1514 (2004)
- Cross AJ, "A prospective study of red and processed meat intake in relation to cancer risk", PLoS Med, 4(12), pp.e325~ (2007)
- Singh PN, "Dietary risk factors for colon cancer in a low-risk population", Am J Epidemiol, 148(8), pp.761~774 (1998)
- Norat T, "Meat, fish, and colorectal cancer risk: the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition", J Natl Cancer Inst, 97(12), pp.906~916 (2005)
- Jarvinen R, "Dietary fat, cholesterol and colorectal cancer in a prospective study", Br J Cancer, 85(3), pp.357~361 (2001)
- Knekt P, "Risk of colorectal and other gastro-intestinal cancers after exposure to nitrate, nitrite and N-nitroso compounds: a follow-up study", Int J Cancer, 80(6), pp.852~856 (1999)
- Iso H, "Nutrition and disease in the Japan collaborative cohort study for evaluation of cancer (JACC)", Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 8(Suppl), pp.35~80 (2007)
- Ollberding NJ, "Meat consumption, heterocyclic amines and colorectal cancer risk: the Multiethnic Cohort Study", Int J Cancer, 131(7), pp.E1125~E1133 (2012)
- Chen J, "A prospective study of N-acetyltransferase genotype, red meat intake, and risk of colorectal cancer", Cancer Res, 58(15), pp.3307~3311 (1998)
- Balder HF, "Heme and chlorophyll intake and risk of colorectal cancer in the Netherlands cohort study", Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 15(4), pp.717~725 (2006)
- Wada K, "Meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk in Japan: the Takayama study", Cancer Sci, 108(5), pp.1065~1070 (2017)