하악 구치부에 식립한 sintered porous surfaced implants의 후향적 다기관 연구
A Retrospective Study of Sintered Porous-surfaced Dental Implants in Restoring the Edentulous Posterior Mandible: Up to Eight Years of Functioning
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose : The aim of this study was to evaluate the surviva rate of sintered porous-surfaced implants placed in the edentulous posterior mandibles, in relation to implant length and diameter, crown-to-implant ratio, and types of prostheses, for a maximum of eight years of functioning. Material and Methods : The study group consisted of 43 partially edentulous patients who visited Catholic University Hospital of Daegu and one private dental clinic. A total of 122 sintered porous-surfaced implants -- Endopore (Innova Life Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) -- were placed in the edentulous posterior mandibles. Two diameter sizes (4.1㎜ and 5.0㎜) and four lengths (5.0㎜, 7.0㎜, 9.0㎜, and 12.0㎜) were used. One hundred and three implants were splinted and 21 implants were nonsplinted. The survival rates of the implants in relation to length, diameter, crown-to-implant ratio, and types of prostheses were investigated. Statistical data were analyzed using SPSS Win.Ver 14.0 software with the Chi-square test. Results : The survival rate of the 4.1mm diameter implants was 100% and 91.2% for the 5.0㎜ diameter implants. The survival rates of the implants of differing diameters were found to be statistically different (p=0.005). The survival rates of both the 5.0㎜ and 7.0㎜ length implants were 100%. The survival rate of the 9.0㎜ length implants was 97.9% and for the 12.0㎜ length implants was 95.1%. There was no statistical difference in survival rates for the differing lengths of implants. Of the 103 prostheses that were splinted, the survival rate was 98.0%. The survival rate of splinted prostheses was higher than that of the non-splinted prostheses, but was found to be not statistically different. There were no failed cases when the crown-to-implant ratio was under 1.0. When the crown-to-implant ratio was between 1.0 and 1.5, the failure rate of the implants was 6.7%. No failure was recorded with the ratio range of 1.5 to 2.0. Relative to the crown-to-implant ratio of 1.0, the failure rates were statistically different (p=0.048). Discussion and Conclusion : The cumulative survival rate of the porous-surfaced implants placed in the edentulous posterior mandibles was 97.5%. Short porous-surfaced implants showed satisfactory results after a maximum of nine years of functioning in the edentulous posterior mandibles.
Abstract
Purpose : The aim of this study was to evaluate the surviva rate of sintered porous-surfaced implants placed in the edentulous posterior mandibles, in relation to implant length and diameter, crown-to-implant ratio, and types of prostheses, for a maximum of eight years of functioning. Material and Methods : The study group consisted of 43 partially edentulous patients who visited Catholic University Hospital of Daegu and one private dental clinic. A total of 122 sintered porous-surfaced implants -- Endopore (Innova Life Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) -- were placed in the edentulous posterior mandibles. Two diameter sizes (4.1㎜ and 5.0㎜) and four lengths (5.0㎜, 7.0㎜, 9.0㎜, and 12.0㎜) were used. One hundred and three implants were splinted and 21 implants were nonsplinted. The survival rates of the implants in relation to length, diameter, crown-to-implant ratio, and types of prostheses were investigated. Statistical data were analyzed using SPSS Win.Ver 14.0 software with the Chi-square test. Results : The survival rate of the 4.1mm diameter implants was 100% and 91.2% for the 5.0㎜ diameter implants. The survival rates of the implants of differing diameters were found to be statistically different (p=0.005). The survival rates of both the 5.0㎜ and 7.0㎜ length implants were 100%. The survival rate of the 9.0㎜ length implants was 97.9% and for the 12.0㎜ length implants was 95.1%. There was no statistical difference in survival rates for the differing lengths of implants. Of the 103 prostheses that were splinted, the survival rate was 98.0%. The survival rate of splinted prostheses was higher than that of the non-splinted prostheses, but was found to be not statistically different. There were no failed cases when the crown-to-implant ratio was under 1.0. When the crown-to-implant ratio was between 1.0 and 1.5, the failure rate of the implants was 6.7%. No failure was recorded with the ratio range of 1.5 to 2.0. Relative to the crown-to-implant ratio of 1.0, the failure rates were statistically different (p=0.048). Discussion and Conclusion : The cumulative survival rate of the porous-surfaced implants placed in the edentulous posterior mandibles was 97.5%. Short porous-surfaced implants showed satisfactory results after a maximum of nine years of functioning in the edentulous posterior mandibles.
참고문헌 (33)
- Quirynen M, "The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: Short-term observations", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.169~178 (1996)
- Hutton JE, "Factors related to success and failure rates at 3-year follow-up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Branemark implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.33~42 (1995)
- Weng D, "A prospective multicenter clinical trial of 3i machined-surface implants: results after 6 years of follow-up", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 18(3), pp.417~423 (2003)
- Jaffin RA, "The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: A 5-year analysis", J Periodontol, 62(1), pp.2~4 (1991)
- Albrektsson T, "Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review and proposed criteria of success", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1(1), pp.11~25 (1986)
- Trisi P, "Bone-implant contact and bone quality: Evaluation of expected and actual bone contact on machined and osseotite implant surfaces", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 22, pp.535~545 (2002)
- Cook SD, "Interface mechanics and histology of titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium for dental implant applications", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2, pp.15~22 (1987)
- Block MS, "Evaluation of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium dental implants in dogs", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 45, pp.601~607 (1987)
- Piattelli M, "Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants. An experimental study in rabbits", J Oral Implantol, 28, pp.2~8 (2002)
- Cochran DL, "The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acidetched(SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 13, pp.144~153 (2002)
- Levy D, "Periodontal parameters around porous-coated dental implants after 3 to 4 years supporting overdentures", J Clin Periodontol, 23(6), pp.517~522 (1996)
- Pilliar RM, "Overview of surface variability of metallic endosseous dental implants: textured and porous surface-structured designs", Implant Dent, 7(4), pp.305~314 (1998)
- Deporter D, "Five- to six-year results of a prospective clinical trial using the Endopore dental implant and a mandibular overdenture", Clin Oral Implants Res, 10(2), pp.95~102 (1999)
- Taylor TD, "Implant prosthodontics: current perspective and future directions", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15(1), pp.66~75 (2000)
- Nevins M, "The successful application of osseointegrated implants to the posterior jaw:A longterm retrospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 8, pp.151~161 (1993)
- Scurria MS, "Prognostic variables associated with implant failure: a retrospective effectiveness study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13(3), pp.400~406 (1998)
- Engquist B, "A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 3(2), pp.129~134 (1988)
- Johns RB, "multicenter study of overdentures supported by Brånemark implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7(4), pp.513~522 (1992)
- Bahat O., "Treatment planning and placement of implants in the posterior maxillae: report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 8(2), pp.151~161 (1993)
- Haas R, "A long-term follow-up of 76 Bränemark single-tooth implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 13(1), pp.38~43 (2002)
- Artzi Z, "A distinguishable observation between survival and success rate outcome of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in 5-10 years in function", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17(1), pp.85~93 (2006)
- Garlini G, "Retrospective clinical study of Osseotite implants: zero- to 5-year results", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 18(4), pp.589~593 (2003)
- Romeo E, "Clinical and radiographic evaluation of small-diameter (3.3-mm) implants followed for 1-7 years: a longitudinal study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17(2), pp.139~148 (2006)
- Deporter D, "Ten-year results of a prospective study using porous-surfaced dental implants and a mandibular overdenture", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 4(4), pp.183~189 (2002)
- Deporter D, "Managing the posterior mandible of partially edentulous patients with short, porous-surfaced dental implants: early data from a clinical trial", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 16(5), pp.653~658 (2001)
- Van Steenberghe D, "Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5(3), pp.272~281 (1990)
- Friberg B, "Long-term follow-up of severely atrophic edentulous mandibles reconstructed with short Brönemark implants", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2(4), pp.184~189 (2000)
- Deporter D, "Simplifying management of the posterior maxilla using short, porous-surfaced dental implants and simultaneous indirect sinus elevation", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 20(5), pp.476~485 (2000)
- Deporter D, "Ultrashort sintered porous-surfaced dental implants used to replace posterior teeth", J Periodontol, 79(7), pp.1280~1286 (2008)
- Albrektsson T, "The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp.11~25 (1986)
- Deporter DA, "A histological comparison in the dog of porous-coated vs. threaded dental implants", J Dent Res, 69(5), pp.1138~1145 (1990)
- Deporter DA, "A prospective clinical study in humans of an endosseous dental implant partially covered with a powder-sintered porous coating: 3- to 4-year results", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11(1), pp.87~95 (1996)
- Ivanoff CJ, "Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14(2), pp.173~180 (1999)
