일반 및 디지탈 측모두부방사선 규격사진, 하드카피의 계측오차 또는 확대율 비교
Comparison of measurement errors between conventional, digital cephalographs and hardcopies.
4
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the measurement error between conventional films, digital cephalographs and hardcopy. The material consisted of 29 cephalographs which used image modality of Asahi CX-90SP in the Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital. One observer measured fiducial measurements at an interval of four weeks. Measurement error was tested by Dahlberg's formula. A paired t-test was used to detect it between each modality. The results are as follows; 1. The monitor-displayed digital image showed enlargement compared with the conventional image. The cephalometric measurements of the monitor-displayed digital image and conventional image were no statistically significant difference except SNB. 2. In conventional image, measurement errors of linear and angular measurements were 0.23mm, 0.36°, respective. In monitor-displayed digital image, measurement errors of linear and angular measurements were 0.63mm, 0.48°, respective. 3. The reduction ratio of hardcopy was 1.01% compared to the monitor-displayed digital image. Based on the results, it indicates that the digital cephalographs and hardcopy using storage phosphor digital radiography showed the same accuracy as the conventional films in clinical use.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the measurement error between conventional films, digital cephalographs and hardcopy. The material consisted of 29 cephalographs which used image modality of Asahi CX-90SP in the Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital. One observer measured fiducial measurements at an interval of four weeks. Measurement error was tested by Dahlberg's formula. A paired t-test was used to detect it between each modality. The results are as follows; 1. The monitor-displayed digital image showed enlargement compared with the conventional image. The cephalometric measurements of the monitor-displayed digital image and conventional image were no statistically significant difference except SNB. 2. In conventional image, measurement errors of linear and angular measurements were 0.23mm, 0.36°, respective. In monitor-displayed digital image, measurement errors of linear and angular measurements were 0.63mm, 0.48°, respective. 3. The reduction ratio of hardcopy was 1.01% compared to the monitor-displayed digital image. Based on the results, it indicates that the digital cephalographs and hardcopy using storage phosphor digital radiography showed the same accuracy as the conventional films in clinical use.
참고문헌 (14)
- 서영훈, "측두 규격방사선사진 촬영시 두부의 위치변화가 확대율에 미치는 영향", 대한소아치과학회지, 28(1), pp.185~194 (2001), 대한소아치과학회
- Bruntz L.Q., "A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.340~348 (2006)
- Paredes V., "Digital diagnosis records in orthodontics. An overview", Med Oral Pathol Oral Cir Bucal, 11, pp.88~93 (2006)
- Forsyth D.B., "Digital imaging of cephalometric radiographs, part 2: image quality", Angle Orthod, 66, pp.43~50 (1996)
- 유상훈, "디지탈 두부 X-선 계측 사진 계측사진 필름과 모니터상 계측점의 신뢰성에 관한 비교 연구", 석사, pp.2004
- Lim K.F., "Phosphor-stimulated computed cephalometry : Reliability of landmark identification", British J Orthod, 24, pp.301~308 (1997)
- Chen Y.J., "Comparison of Landmark Identification in Traditional Versus Computer-Aided Digital Cephalometry", Angle Orthod, 70, pp.387~392 (2000)
- Geelen W., "Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique", Eur J Orthod, 20, pp.331~340 (1998)
- Nolte K., "Comparison of linear measurement in cephalometric studies", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 122, pp.196~201 (2002)
- Sayinsu K., "An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings", Eur J Orthod, 29, pp.105~108 (2007)
- Macri V., "Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalograms", Eur J Orthod, 15, pp.137~148 (1993)
- Nimkarn Y., "Realibility of computer generated cephalometrics", International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery, 10, pp.43~52 (1995)
- Schulze R.W., "Landmark identification on digital versus film-based cephalometric radiographs: A human skull study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 122, pp.635~642 (2002)
- Dahlberg G., "Statistical methods for medical and biological students" (1940), Interscience publications