골 이식술 후 Osstem Implant (US II Plus/GS II)의 다기관 임상연구
A multicenter clinical study of installed US II Plus/GS II Osstem implants after bone graft
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the US II plus/GS II OsstemⓇ implants through the study for the clinical success rate during the installation of the Osstem¢Á implants after bone graft. Materials and Methods : This study was researched in the 4 medical institutions: Chonnam National University, Chosun University, Bundang Seoul National University Hospital, and FM dental clinic from May, 2002 to September, 2009. Based on the total number of 60 patients whose treatment was the installation of the US II plus/GS II Osstem¢Á implants after bone graft, we evaluated success rate of implants. We analysis the distribution of patient’s age and gender, edentulous area, bone type, fixture length and diameter, installation and loading time, donor site, bone graft material and method, antagonistic teeth, and survival and success rate. From these analyses we got the following results. Results : 1. In this study, the total number of patients who have been installed with US II plus implant was 27, and total of 52implants were installed. The average age was 38.9, with 16 male, and 11 female patients. 2. The total number of patients who have been installed with GS II implant was 33, and total of 54 implants were installed. The average age was 49.7, with 24 male, and 9 female patients. 3. As for bone graft method, either autogenous bone or a mix of autogenous and heterogenous bone was used(88.4%) for US II plus. Chin, iliac, and Maxillary tuberosity were the donor sites for autogenous bone graft, and onlay method of bone graft was performed. 4. Allogenic bone or a mix of autogenous and heterogenous bone was used(77.8%) for GS II. Chin, ramus, and tibia were the donor sites for autogenous bone graft, and GBR method of bone graft was performed. 5. The duration from the installation of implants to setting of final prosthesis was average of 16 months and 10 months for US II plus and GS II respectively. Also, the final follow up period was average of 31 months and 28 months respectively. During this period, one GS II implant was removed from 1 patient due to failure of early osteointegration. 6. The survival rates were 100% and 98.1%, and success rates were 94.2% and 94.4% for US II plus and GS II implant respectively. Conclusion : On the evaluation of our clinical study, both US II plus and GS II Osstem¢Á implants showed the excellent clinical results after bone graft.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the US II plus/GS II OsstemⓇ implants through the study for the clinical success rate during the installation of the Osstem¢Á implants after bone graft. Materials and Methods : This study was researched in the 4 medical institutions: Chonnam National University, Chosun University, Bundang Seoul National University Hospital, and FM dental clinic from May, 2002 to September, 2009. Based on the total number of 60 patients whose treatment was the installation of the US II plus/GS II Osstem¢Á implants after bone graft, we evaluated success rate of implants. We analysis the distribution of patient’s age and gender, edentulous area, bone type, fixture length and diameter, installation and loading time, donor site, bone graft material and method, antagonistic teeth, and survival and success rate. From these analyses we got the following results. Results : 1. In this study, the total number of patients who have been installed with US II plus implant was 27, and total of 52implants were installed. The average age was 38.9, with 16 male, and 11 female patients. 2. The total number of patients who have been installed with GS II implant was 33, and total of 54 implants were installed. The average age was 49.7, with 24 male, and 9 female patients. 3. As for bone graft method, either autogenous bone or a mix of autogenous and heterogenous bone was used(88.4%) for US II plus. Chin, iliac, and Maxillary tuberosity were the donor sites for autogenous bone graft, and onlay method of bone graft was performed. 4. Allogenic bone or a mix of autogenous and heterogenous bone was used(77.8%) for GS II. Chin, ramus, and tibia were the donor sites for autogenous bone graft, and GBR method of bone graft was performed. 5. The duration from the installation of implants to setting of final prosthesis was average of 16 months and 10 months for US II plus and GS II respectively. Also, the final follow up period was average of 31 months and 28 months respectively. During this period, one GS II implant was removed from 1 patient due to failure of early osteointegration. 6. The survival rates were 100% and 98.1%, and success rates were 94.2% and 94.4% for US II plus and GS II implant respectively. Conclusion : On the evaluation of our clinical study, both US II plus and GS II Osstem¢Á implants showed the excellent clinical results after bone graft.
참고문헌 (22)
- Lekholm U, "Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.639~645 (1999)
- Quirynen M, "Distribution of bacterial morphotypes around natural teeth and titanium implants ad modum Branemark", Clin Oral Implants Res, 1, pp.8~12 (1990)
- Bryant SR, "The effects of age, jaw site, and bone condition on oral implant outcomes", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.470~490 (1998)
- Smith RA, "Risk factors associated with dental implants in healthy and medically compromised patients", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.367~372 (1992)
- Kim YG, "Bone graft and implant 2-1", pp.27~ (2007), DaehanNarae Publishing, Inc
- Ivanoff CJ, "Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.173~180 (1999)
- Huwiler MA, "Resonance frequency analysis in relation to jawbone characteristics and during early healing of implant installation", Clin Oral Implants Res, 18, pp.275~280 (2007)
- Rabel A, "Clinical study on the primary stability of two dental implant systems with resonance frequency analysis", Clin Oral Investig, 11, pp.257~265 (2007)
- 박주희, "The effect of various thread designs on the initial stability of taper implants", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 1(1), pp.19~25 (2009), 대한치과보철학회
- Kim YG, "Bone graft and implant 2-2", pp.18~ (2007), DaehanNarae Publishing, Inc
- el Askary AS, "Why do dental implants fail? Part I", Implant Dent, 8, pp.173~185 (1999)
- el Askary AS, "Why do dental implants fail? Part II", Implant Dent, 8, pp.265~277 (1999)
- Albrektsson T, "Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man", Acta Orthop Scand, 52, pp.155~170 (1981)
- van Steenberghe D, "Survival and success rates with oral endosseous implants", Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Periodontolog, pp.242~254 (1999), Quintessence Publishing Co
- The Korean academy of oral & maxillofacial implantology, "Oral & maxillofacial implantology, Vol II Advanced concepts and techniques", pp.326~ (2006), DaehanNarae Publishing, Inc
- Lekholm U, "Patienr selection and preparation, In Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry", pp.199~209 (1985), Quintessence Publishing Co
- Buser D, "Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 8, pp.161~172 (1997)
- Stephen W, "Use of the Frialit-2 Implant 532 system in Private Practice: A Clinical report", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 4, pp.552~555 (2003)
- Gomez-Roman G, "immediate Postextraction Implant Placement with Root-Analog Stepped Implants: surgical procedure and Statistical outcome After 6 Years", Int J Oral Maxillofac implants, 4, pp.503~513 (2001)
- Kim JS, "Preprosthetic Stage Dental Implant Failure", J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg, 27, pp.178~183 (2001)
- Drago CJ, "A clinical report on the 18-month cumulative survival rates of implants and implant prostheses with an internal connection implant system", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 27, pp.266~271 (2006)
- Schmitt A, "The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants for single-tooth replacement", J Prosthodont, 6, pp.197~202 (1993)