본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Buying Fashion Impulsively: Environmental and Personal Influences

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

The purpose of this study was to develop an explanatorymodel of impulse buying that addressed antecedents of impulsebuying. For this research, impulse buying was defined as anunplanned, hedonic purchase that follows a sudden urge. Impulse buying reflects a rapid decision in response to astimulus reflecting little cognitive consideration and disregardfor consequences. Donovan and Roissiter (1982) suggested thata pleasant store environment (S) causes shoppers’ positiveemotional states (O) and this in turn, yields shoppers’approach behaviors (R), that is, a desire to remain in a storeand explore its offerings. Applying this idea to impulse buyingsuggests that there are environmental stimuli in a store thatcould impact shoppers’ impulse buying tendencies and thatindividual shopper characteristics could moderate the influenceof these environmental influences. Therefore, environmentalinfluences on impulse buying and personal characteristics ofimpulse buyers were examined in a modified stimulusorganism-response (S-O-R) framework. Environmental stimuli (i.e., ambient factor, aesthetic factor,layout factor, excitement factor, promotion factor, salesassociate factor) were predicted to influence shoppers’ moodand subsequently, contribute to impulse purchases. In addition,specific shoppers’ characteristics (i.e., lack of control,extroversion, innovativeness, hedonic consumption tendency,impulse buying tendency) were predicted to moderate therelationship between environmental stimuli and shopper’simpulse purchases. Data was collected from a convenience sample of 299undergraduates at two Midwestern universities in the UnitedStates. Participants were asked to complete the questionnaireimmediately after they had gone shopping for apparel, shoes,or accessories. Participants answered questions on theirpurchase, perceptions of the store environment, mood, andpersonal characteristics. Most of the participants were females (93.3%), agedbetween 18 and 23 (92.6%). They were never married (95.8%)and Euro American (83.5%). Participants’ impulse buyingreflected pure impulse buying (28.3%), suggestion impulsebuying (20.3%), reminder impulse buying (34.1%), andnon-impulse buying (17.4%). Approximately 40 percent of the participants classified their purchase as either very impulsive orimpulsive. The prices of the items that participants purchasedranged from $1 to $319 (m=$ 45). Participants purchased anitem of apparel (65%), shoes (21%) or accessories (14%). Hypothesis 1 predicted that specific store environmentalstimuli are associated with the perceived impulsiveness of apurchase. Only the relationship between store layout andimpulsiveness of purchase was significant (t=3.30, p<.01) witha path coefficient of .20. Hypothesis 2 posited that shopper’smood will be attributed to specific store environmental stimuli. The ambience, excitement, and sales associate variables hadsignificant relationships with participants’ mood. The pathcoefficient was .27 (t=4.77, p<.01) for the relationship betweenstore ambience and mood, .29 (t=4.83, p<.01) for therelationship between store excitement and mood, and .18(t=3.11, p<.01) for the relationship between sales associate andmood. Hypothesis 3 proposed that the perceived impulsivenessof a purchase is associated with shopper’s mood. There was asignificant relationship (t=4.01, p<.01, path coefficient of .24). The more positive the reported mood of participants, the morethey perceived their purchases as impulsive. Hypothesis 4predicted that specific participant’ characteristics (i.e., lack ofcontrol, extroversion, innovativeness, hedonic consumptiontendency, and impulse buying tendency) would moderaterelationships between store environmental cues and theperceived impulsiveness of their purchases. A specificcharacteristic of participants, lack of control moderated therelationship between store layout and the perceivedimpulsiveness of their purchases. Our findings supported the proposed research framework, thestimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) model; positive emotionalresponses (O) resulted in approach behaviors (R), an impulsepurchase. As reflected in the model, specific storeenvironmental stimuli (S) such as ambiance, excitement, andsales associates were a significant positive influence onshoppers’ mood during shopping. The findings supported theexistence of a direct relationship between a store environmentalstimulus (S), store layout and a consumer approach behavior(R), impulse buying. Store aesthetics and promotion were notassociated with either participant’s mood or impulse buying. Apersonal characteristic, lack of control moderated therelationship between store layout and impulse buying. Clearly our findings point to the importance of store layoutwhen shopping for fashion related items. In addition, providingentertainment that enhances the hedonic and the experientialvalue of the store experience can influence young adultconsumers. Since consumers’ mood at the point-of-purchasemay be influenced by interactions with sales associates, sales associate training to enhance the consumer experience shouldnot be neglected.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop an explanatorymodel of impulse buying that addressed antecedents of impulsebuying. For this research, impulse buying was defined as anunplanned, hedonic purchase that follows a sudden urge. Impulse buying reflects a rapid decision in response to astimulus reflecting little cognitive consideration and disregardfor consequences. Donovan and Roissiter (1982) suggested thata pleasant store environment (S) causes shoppers’ positiveemotional states (O) and this in turn, yields shoppers’approach behaviors (R), that is, a desire to remain in a storeand explore its offerings. Applying this idea to impulse buyingsuggests that there are environmental stimuli in a store thatcould impact shoppers’ impulse buying tendencies and thatindividual shopper characteristics could moderate the influenceof these environmental influences. Therefore, environmentalinfluences on impulse buying and personal characteristics ofimpulse buyers were examined in a modified stimulusorganism-response (S-O-R) framework. Environmental stimuli (i.e., ambient factor, aesthetic factor,layout factor, excitement factor, promotion factor, salesassociate factor) were predicted to influence shoppers’ moodand subsequently, contribute to impulse purchases. In addition,specific shoppers’ characteristics (i.e., lack of control,extroversion, innovativeness, hedonic consumption tendency,impulse buying tendency) were predicted to moderate therelationship between environmental stimuli and shopper’simpulse purchases. Data was collected from a convenience sample of 299undergraduates at two Midwestern universities in the UnitedStates. Participants were asked to complete the questionnaireimmediately after they had gone shopping for apparel, shoes,or accessories. Participants answered questions on theirpurchase, perceptions of the store environment, mood, andpersonal characteristics. Most of the participants were females (93.3%), agedbetween 18 and 23 (92.6%). They were never married (95.8%)and Euro American (83.5%). Participants’ impulse buyingreflected pure impulse buying (28.3%), suggestion impulsebuying (20.3%), reminder impulse buying (34.1%), andnon-impulse buying (17.4%). Approximately 40 percent of the participants classified their purchase as either very impulsive orimpulsive. The prices of the items that participants purchasedranged from $1 to $319 (m=$ 45). Participants purchased anitem of apparel (65%), shoes (21%) or accessories (14%). Hypothesis 1 predicted that specific store environmentalstimuli are associated with the perceived impulsiveness of apurchase. Only the relationship between store layout andimpulsiveness of purchase was significant (t=3.30, p<.01) witha path coefficient of .20. Hypothesis 2 posited that shopper’smood will be attributed to specific store environmental stimuli. The ambience, excitement, and sales associate variables hadsignificant relationships with participants’ mood. The pathcoefficient was .27 (t=4.77, p<.01) for the relationship betweenstore ambience and mood, .29 (t=4.83, p<.01) for therelationship between store excitement and mood, and .18(t=3.11, p<.01) for the relationship between sales associate andmood. Hypothesis 3 proposed that the perceived impulsivenessof a purchase is associated with shopper’s mood. There was asignificant relationship (t=4.01, p<.01, path coefficient of .24). The more positive the reported mood of participants, the morethey perceived their purchases as impulsive. Hypothesis 4predicted that specific participant’ characteristics (i.e., lack ofcontrol, extroversion, innovativeness, hedonic consumptiontendency, and impulse buying tendency) would moderaterelationships between store environmental cues and theperceived impulsiveness of their purchases. A specificcharacteristic of participants, lack of control moderated therelationship between store layout and the perceivedimpulsiveness of their purchases. Our findings supported the proposed research framework, thestimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) model; positive emotionalresponses (O) resulted in approach behaviors (R), an impulsepurchase. As reflected in the model, specific storeenvironmental stimuli (S) such as ambiance, excitement, andsales associates were a significant positive influence onshoppers’ mood during shopping. The findings supported theexistence of a direct relationship between a store environmentalstimulus (S), store layout and a consumer approach behavior(R), impulse buying. Store aesthetics and promotion were notassociated with either participant’s mood or impulse buying. Apersonal characteristic, lack of control moderated therelationship between store layout and impulse buying. Clearly our findings point to the importance of store layoutwhen shopping for fashion related items. In addition, providingentertainment that enhances the hedonic and the experientialvalue of the store experience can influence young adultconsumers. Since consumers’ mood at the point-of-purchasemay be influenced by interactions with sales associates, sales associate training to enhance the consumer experience shouldnot be neglected.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. Abrahams, B., "It’s all in the mind", Marketing, pp.31~33 (1997)
  2. Beatty, S. E., "Impulse buying : Modeling its precursors", Journal of Retailing, 74(2), pp.169~191 (1998)
  3. Byrne, B. M., "Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming" (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc
  4. Calder, B. J., "Designing research for application", Journal of Consumer Research, 8(2), pp.197~207 (1981)
  5. Clover, V. T., "Relative importance of impulse buying in retail stores", Journal of Marketing, 25(3), pp.66~70 (1950)
  6. "Consumer Buying Habits Studies", E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co, ~ (1945)
  7. "The Global Lifestyle Monitor Survey" (2006)[URL]
  8. Darden, W. R., "Exploring the concept of affective quality : Expanding the concept of retail personality", Journal of Business Research, 29(2), pp.101~109 (1994)
  9. Davidson, W. R., "Retailing Management" (1966), The Ronald Press Company
  10. Dawson, S. A., "Shopping motives : Emotional states, and retail outcomes", Journal of Retailing, 66(4), pp.408~427 (1990)
  11. DeSarbo, W. S., "Typologies of compulsive buying behavior : A contained clusterwise regression approach", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5(3), pp.231~262 (1996)
  12. Dittmar, H., "Self-image – Is it in the bag? A qualitative comparison between"ordinary"and"excessive"consumers", Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(2), pp.109~142 (2000)
  13. Donovan, R. J., "Store atmosphere : An environmental psychology approach", Journal of Retailing, 58(1), pp.34~57 (1982)
  14. Eroglu, S., "Empirical testing of a model of online store atmospherics and shopper responses", Psychology & Marketing, 20(2), pp.139~150 (2003)
  15. Fiore, A. M., "An integrative framework capturing experiential and utilitarian shopping experience", International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(6), pp.421~442 (2007)
  16. Gardner, M. P., "Mood states and consumer behavior : A critical review", Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), pp.281~299 (1985)
  17. Gardner, M. P., "Effects of impulse purchase on consumers’ affective states", Advances in Consumer Research, 15(1), pp.127~130 (1988)
  18. Gilboa, S., "Store environment, emotions and approach behavior : Applying environmental aesthetics to retailing", International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research, 13(2), pp.195~211 (2003)
  19. Goldsmith, R. E., "Measuring consumer innovativeness", Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), pp.209~221 (1991)
  20. Grossbart, S. L., "Environmental sensitivity and shopping behavior", Journal of Business Research, 3(4), pp.281~294 (1975)
  21. Hausman, A., "A multi-method investigation of consumer motivations in impulse buying behavior", Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(5), pp.403~419 (2000)
  22. Hendriks, A. A. J., "The five-factor personality inventory(FFPI)", "Personality and Individual Differences, 27(2), pp.307~325 (1999)
  23. Herbadi, A. G., "Consumption experience of impulse buying in Indonesia : Emotional arousal and hedonic considerations", Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12(1), pp.20~31 (2009)
  24. Holbrook, E. C., "The experiential aspects of consumption : Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun", Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), pp.132~140 (1982)
  25. Jones, M. A., "The Product-specific nature of impulse buying tendency", Journal of Business Research, 56(7), pp.505~511 (2003)
  26. Kacen, J. J., "The influence of culture on consumer impulsive buying behavior", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), pp.163~176 (2002)
  27. Kim, J. E., "Sales associate's appearance : Links to consumers’ emotions, store image, and purchases", Journal of Retailing & Consumer Services, 16(5), pp.407~413 (2009)
  28. Liao, S. L., "The effects of sales promotiona strategy, product appeal and consumer traits on reminder impulse buying behavior", International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(3), pp.274~284 (2009)
  29. "Teen Market Profile" (2004)[URL]
  30. Mano, H., "The influence of pre-existing negative affect on store purchase intentions", Journal of Retailing, 75(2), pp.149~172 (1999)
  31. Mathwick, C., "Experiential value : Conceptualization, measurement, and application in the catalogue and internet shopping environment", Journal of Retailing, 77(1), pp.39~56 (2001)
  32. Mattila, A. S., "Congruency of scent and music as a driver of in-store evaluations and behavior", Journal of Retailing, 77(2), pp.273~289 (2001)
  33. Mehrabian, A., "An Approach to Environmental Psychology" (1974), Massachusetts Institution of Technology
  34. Morales, A., "Perceptions of assortment variety : The effects of congruency between consumers’ internal and retailers’ external organization", Journal of Retailing, 81(2), pp.159~169 (2005)
  35. Mummalaneni, V., "An empirical investigation of web site characteristics, consumer emotional states and on-line shopping behaviors", Journal of Business Research, 58(4), pp.526~532 (2005)
  36. Nichols, J. A. F., "Inter-American perspectives from mall shoppers : Chile-United States", Journal of Global Marketing, 15(1), pp.87~103 (2001)
  37. Oh, J., "Effects of design factors on store image and expectation of merchandise quality in web-based stores", Journal of Retailing & Consumer Services, 15(4), pp.237~249 (2008)
  38. Park, E. J., "A Structural model of fashion-oriented impulse buying behavior", Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 10(4), pp.433~446 (2006)
  39. Park, J. H., "Television apparel shopping : Impulse buying and parasocial interaction", Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 22(3), pp.135~144 (2004)
  40. Phau, I., "Profiling fashion innovators", Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 8(4), pp.399~411 (2004)
  41. Rook, D. W., "The buying impulse", Journal of Consumer Research, 14(1), pp.189~199 (1987)
  42. Rook, D. W., "Normative influences on impulsive buying behavior", Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), pp.305~313 (1995)
  43. Solomon, M. R., "Consumer Behavior : Buying, Having and Being" (2004), Prentice Hall
  44. Stern, H., "The Significance of Impulse Buying Today", Journal of Marketing, 26(2), pp.59~62 (1962)
  45. Swinyard, W. R., "The impact of shopper mood and retail salesperson credibility on shopper attitudes and behavior. International Review of Retail", Distribution and Consumer Research, 5(4), pp.488~503 (1995)
  46. Tellegen, A., "Brief Manual for the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire", pp.1982
  47. Verplanken, B., "Individual differences in impulse buying tendency : Feeling and no thinking", European Journal of Personality, 15(1), pp.71~83 (2001)
  48. Wakefield, K., "Excitement at the mall : Determinants and effects on shopping response", Journal of Retailing, 74(4), pp.515~539 (1998)
  49. Wang, L. C., "Can a retail web site be social?", Journal of Marketing, 71(3), pp.143~157 (2007)
  50. Weinberg, P., "Impulsive consumer buying as a result of emotions", Journal of Business Research, 10(1), pp.43~57 (1982)
  51. Wood, M., "Discretionary unplanned buying in consumer society", Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(4), pp.268~281 (2005)
  52. Youn, S., "Impulse buying : Its relation to personality traits and cues", Advances in Consumer Research, 27(1), pp.179~185 (2000)
  53. Zaichkowsky, J. L., "The personal involvement inventory : Reduction, revision, and application to advertising", Journal of Advertising, 23(4), pp.59~70 (1994)
  54. Zhou, L., "Consumer impulse buying and in-store stimuli in Chinese supermarkets", Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 16(2), pp.37~53 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)