본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Consumers’ purchase intention of 3D-printed apparel

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

The purpose of the current study is to address how perceived product characteristics (e.g., compatibility, aesthetics), consumers’ confidence (e.g., self-efficacy) and attitude, and social influence (e.g., subjective norm) influence purchase intention of 3D-printed apparel. A total of 1,002 U.S. participants were recruited. The results indicated that purchase intention was mostly determined by a favorable attitude, moderately determined by a characteristic of the product (compatibility), and limitedly determined by the social influence (subjective norm). In addition, a positive attitude was largely determined by aesthetics and compatibility of 3D-printed apparel, moderately determined by self-efficacy, and limitedly contributed by social influences. Therefore, as an innovative product that has not yet been widely spread in the market, consumers’ attitudes toward 3D-printed apparel were mostly determined by the product itself: whether it is aesthetically pleasing, and whether it is suitable for consumers’ lifestyle and needs. Consumers’ confidence in using the product moderately and social influences limitedly contributed to a favorable attitude. This study filled a research gap about consumers’ purchase intentions of 3D-printed apparel. This study also provided important insights for the apparel industry to effectively create and promote 3D-printed apparel in future.

Abstract

The purpose of the current study is to address how perceived product characteristics (e.g., compatibility, aesthetics), consumers’ confidence (e.g., self-efficacy) and attitude, and social influence (e.g., subjective norm) influence purchase intention of 3D-printed apparel. A total of 1,002 U.S. participants were recruited. The results indicated that purchase intention was mostly determined by a favorable attitude, moderately determined by a characteristic of the product (compatibility), and limitedly determined by the social influence (subjective norm). In addition, a positive attitude was largely determined by aesthetics and compatibility of 3D-printed apparel, moderately determined by self-efficacy, and limitedly contributed by social influences. Therefore, as an innovative product that has not yet been widely spread in the market, consumers’ attitudes toward 3D-printed apparel were mostly determined by the product itself: whether it is aesthetically pleasing, and whether it is suitable for consumers’ lifestyle and needs. Consumers’ confidence in using the product moderately and social influences limitedly contributed to a favorable attitude. This study filled a research gap about consumers’ purchase intentions of 3D-printed apparel. This study also provided important insights for the apparel industry to effectively create and promote 3D-printed apparel in future.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Ajzen, I., "Understanding attitudes and prediction social behaviour" (1980), Prentice-Hall
  2. Baker, M. J., "The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations", Journal of Marketing Research, 14, pp.538~555 (1977)
  3. Bandura, A., "Self-effi cacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change", Psychological Review, 84, pp.191~215 (1977)
  4. Brown, S. A., "Household technology use: Integrating household life cycle and the model of adoption of technology in households", The information society, 22, pp.205~218 (2006)
  5. Buhrmester, M., "Amazon’s mechanical Turka new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?", Perspectives on psychological science, 6, pp.3~5 (2011)
  6. Chang, M. K., "Predicting unethical behavior: A comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior", Journal of business ethics, 17, pp.1825~1834 (1998)
  7. Durndell, A., "Computer self efficacy and gender: A cross cultural study of Scotland and Romania", Personality and individual diff erences, 28, pp.1037~1044 (2000)
  8. Ellen, P. S., "Resistance to technological innovations: An examination of the role of self-effi cacy and performance satisfaction", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19, pp.297~307 (1991)
  9. Fiore, A. M., "Effects of a product display and environmental fragrancing on approach responses and pleasurable experiences", Psychology and Marketing, 17, pp.27~54 (2000)
  10. Gao, Y., "An empirical study of wearable technology acceptance in healthcare", Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115, pp.1704~1723 (2015)
  11. Goodman, J. K., "Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, pp.213~224 (2013)
  12. Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis: Maxwell Macmillan" (2010), Prentice Hall
  13. Holbrook, M. B., "Aims, concepts, and methods for the representation of individual differences in esthetic responses to design features", Journal of Consumer Research, 13, pp.337~347 (1986)
  14. Hsu, M. H., "Internet self-effi cacy and electronic service acceptance", Decision support systems, 38, pp.369~381 (2004)
  15. Hudson, S. E., "Printing teddy bears: A technique for 3D printing of soft interactive objects", Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp.459~468 (2014)
  16. Hwang, C., "Consumers’ acceptance of wearable technology: Examining solar-powered clothing", master, pp.2014
  17. Kang, J., "Environmentally sustainable textile and apparel consumption:The role of consumer knowledge, perceived consumer effectiveness and perceived personal relevance", International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37, pp.442~452 (2013)
  18. Khasawneh, M., "A model for adoption of ICT in Jordanian higher education institutions: An empirical study", Journal of e-Learning & Higher Education, 2012, pp.1~10 (2012)
  19. Kim, S. H., "Effects of social infl uence on consumers’ voluntary adoption of innovations prompted by others", Journal of Business Research, 64, pp.1190~1194 (2011)
  20. Ko, E., "Comparative analysis of purchase intentions toward smart clothing between Korean and US consumers", Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 27, pp.259~273 (2009)
  21. Lamb, J. M., "A conceptual framework for apparel design", Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10, pp.42~47 (1992)
  22. Loker, S., "Size-specific analysis of body scan data to improve apparel fit", Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 4(3), pp.1~15 (2005)
  23. MacKenzie, S. B., "The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations", Journal of marketing research, 23, pp.130~143 (1986)
  24. Marsh, H. W., "Application of confi rmatory factor analysis to the study of selfconcept:First- and higher-order factor models and their invariance across groups", Psychological Bulletin, 97, pp.562~582 (1985)
  25. (2013)[URL]
  26. Melnikova, R., "3D printing of textile-based structures by Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) with diff erent polymer materials", Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 62(1), pp.1~6 (2014)
  27. Mowen, J. C., "Upper Saddle River" (1998), Prentice-Hall
  28. Mumcu, Y., "The effect of visual product aesthetics on consumers’ price sensitivity", Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, pp.528~534 (2015)
  29. Page, C., "An investigation of the processes by which product design and brand strength interact to determine initial aff ect and quality judgments", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, pp.133~147 (2002)
  30. Parker, C. J., "Human acceptance of 3d printing in fashion paradox: Is mass customization a bridge too far?", WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences, 113, pp.373~380 (2016)
  31. Perry, A., "Understand attitude-behavior gaps and benefi t-behavior connections in Eco-Apparel", Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 20(1), pp.1~15 (2016)
  32. Summers, T. A., "Predicting purchase intention of a controversial luxury apparel product", Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 10, pp.405~419 (2006)
  33. Taub, G. E., "Effects of general and broad cognitive abilities on mathematics achievement", School Psychology Quarterly, 23, pp.187~198 (2008)
  34. Taylor, S., "Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models", Information systems research, 6, pp.144~176 (1995)
  35. Van Slyke, C., "Factors infl uencing the adoption of web-based shopping: The impact of trust", ACM Sigmis Database, 35, pp.32~49 (2004)
  36. Van Slyke, C., "Gender differences in perceptions of web-based shopping", Communications of the ACM, 45, pp.82~86 (2002)
  37. Vijayasarathy, L. R., "Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: The case for an augmented technology acceptance model", Information & Management, 41, pp.747~762 (2004)
  38. Yamamoto, M., "The impact of product aesthetics on the evaluation of industrial products", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, pp.309~324 (1994)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)