The Personality of Luxury Fashion Brands
1
조회
0
다운로드
24
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The focus of brand differentiation is shifting increasingly tosymbolic benefits mainly because of changing marketconditions and consumer preferences. On the one hand, thefunctional benefits of many products on the market todaybecome increasingly equivalent and exchangeable. On the otherhand, an increasing number of consumers engage in symbolicconsumption and decide for a product mainly due to thecongruity between their personality and the symbolicpersonality of the product or brand. These trends lead to anincreased interest in the brand personality concept, whichoffers a systematic approach to create symbolic benefits. Although luxury brands are characterised with strongsymbolic benefits that often even exceed their functionalbenefits and that refer to a large extent to human personalitytraits, there exists only a small literature base about thesymbolic meaning of luxury brands and no specific brandpersonality framework. This paper sets a foundation for aluxury brand personality framework with an investigation ofpersonality traits as the basic elements of a brand personality. More specifically, its objective is to uncover the entireuniverse of personality traits that luxury brands represent inthe eyes of their consumers based on two empirical studies. These studies focus on luxury fashion brands as this industrycovers the biggest variety of brand images. As a prerequisite,this paper defines luxury brands as the objects of investigation,explains the concept of brand personality and its commonresearch methodology and outlines the requirements andselection criteria for luxury brand personality traits. The brand personality refers to the set of humancharacteristics associated with a brand. Aaker developed themost established theoretical framework of brand personalitydimensions and a scale to measure them by drawing onresearch about the Big Five human personality dimensions. More than 600 U.S. respondents rated on a five-point Likertscale a subset of 37 general brands of varying categories on114 personality traits. Aaker consolidated the personality traitsby factor analyses to five distinct dimensions. This paperproposes a research methodology specifically for theinvestigation of luxury brand personality traits. It builds on aconsumer-oriented qualitative approach using the repertory gridmethod (RGM), which is constrained by a conceptual framework of guidelines and selection criteria, but remainsflexible enough to consider the ambiguous and contextualaspects of brand personality. While the quantitative approachrequires deleting ambiguous and contextual traits that load onmultiple factors, RGM allows respondents to describeconstructs with a group of words and enables researchers todecode their varying contextual meanings for differentconstructs. In addition, RGM matches the consumer-orientationin brand management as the resulting sets of traits and brandsoriginate directly from the respondents. A major modificationto the common research approach is that each trait has toconsist of three adjectives. While a single adjective can bevery ambiguous, word combinations become more precise aspeople can rely on their overlapping meaning. The first study covers in-depth interviews with about 50luxury consumers about their associations with luxury brandsaccording to the RGM and led to a set of 49 personality traitsand five major personality dimensions. These dimensionsinclude modernity, eccentricity, opulence, elitism, and strength. Modernity describes the temporal perspective of a brand, whichcan lie either in the past or in the present or future. Eccentricity describes the level of discrepancy from socialnorms and expectations. Opulence refers to the level ofconspicuousness of the symbols of wealth. These symbolscover a wide range of associations including ostentatious logosand valuable materials. Elitism covers the level of status andexclusivity that is displayed by the brand. Finally, strengthdescribes the level of toughness and masculinity of a brand. The validity of results improves if they are replicated withother studies and with varying research methodologies. To thisend, the resulting set of personality traits was tested andadapted with a complementary study that includes face-to-faceinterviews with about 60 luxury insiders, who were asked todescribe their associations with several luxury brand printadverts first in their own words and then with the help of thepre-existing personality traits. Results include the first comprehensive overview of luxurybrand personality traits categorized by the five majorpersonality dimensions. Altogether, there are 52 luxury brandpersonality traits including for example “traditional,history-charged, time-honored” and “modern, future- conscious,progressive”. For researchers, these findings offer a foundationfor further research on luxury brand personality and analyzingits antecedents and consequences. Because of the focus onGermany, the complexity of the subject and changes in theluxury symbolism over time, the resulting set of traits cannotbe seen as a generally applicable, static and final solution. Forexample, the trait catalogue could be verified and adapted by additional empirical studies for specific luxury industries,consumer segments or for other countries. In addition, the setof traits provides a basis for the verification of the personalitydimensions with a quantitative consumer survey according tothe approach of Aaker and for analyses about specific traitcombinations, binary oppositions or comprehensive personalityprofiles. The categorization of luxury brand personality traitsprovides marketers a framework for the analysis of emotionalluxury brand images and the development of a luxury brandpersonality, so to say its “aura”, “magic” or “DNA”.
Abstract
The focus of brand differentiation is shifting increasingly tosymbolic benefits mainly because of changing marketconditions and consumer preferences. On the one hand, thefunctional benefits of many products on the market todaybecome increasingly equivalent and exchangeable. On the otherhand, an increasing number of consumers engage in symbolicconsumption and decide for a product mainly due to thecongruity between their personality and the symbolicpersonality of the product or brand. These trends lead to anincreased interest in the brand personality concept, whichoffers a systematic approach to create symbolic benefits. Although luxury brands are characterised with strongsymbolic benefits that often even exceed their functionalbenefits and that refer to a large extent to human personalitytraits, there exists only a small literature base about thesymbolic meaning of luxury brands and no specific brandpersonality framework. This paper sets a foundation for aluxury brand personality framework with an investigation ofpersonality traits as the basic elements of a brand personality. More specifically, its objective is to uncover the entireuniverse of personality traits that luxury brands represent inthe eyes of their consumers based on two empirical studies. These studies focus on luxury fashion brands as this industrycovers the biggest variety of brand images. As a prerequisite,this paper defines luxury brands as the objects of investigation,explains the concept of brand personality and its commonresearch methodology and outlines the requirements andselection criteria for luxury brand personality traits. The brand personality refers to the set of humancharacteristics associated with a brand. Aaker developed themost established theoretical framework of brand personalitydimensions and a scale to measure them by drawing onresearch about the Big Five human personality dimensions. More than 600 U.S. respondents rated on a five-point Likertscale a subset of 37 general brands of varying categories on114 personality traits. Aaker consolidated the personality traitsby factor analyses to five distinct dimensions. This paperproposes a research methodology specifically for theinvestigation of luxury brand personality traits. It builds on aconsumer-oriented qualitative approach using the repertory gridmethod (RGM), which is constrained by a conceptual framework of guidelines and selection criteria, but remainsflexible enough to consider the ambiguous and contextualaspects of brand personality. While the quantitative approachrequires deleting ambiguous and contextual traits that load onmultiple factors, RGM allows respondents to describeconstructs with a group of words and enables researchers todecode their varying contextual meanings for differentconstructs. In addition, RGM matches the consumer-orientationin brand management as the resulting sets of traits and brandsoriginate directly from the respondents. A major modificationto the common research approach is that each trait has toconsist of three adjectives. While a single adjective can bevery ambiguous, word combinations become more precise aspeople can rely on their overlapping meaning. The first study covers in-depth interviews with about 50luxury consumers about their associations with luxury brandsaccording to the RGM and led to a set of 49 personality traitsand five major personality dimensions. These dimensionsinclude modernity, eccentricity, opulence, elitism, and strength. Modernity describes the temporal perspective of a brand, whichcan lie either in the past or in the present or future. Eccentricity describes the level of discrepancy from socialnorms and expectations. Opulence refers to the level ofconspicuousness of the symbols of wealth. These symbolscover a wide range of associations including ostentatious logosand valuable materials. Elitism covers the level of status andexclusivity that is displayed by the brand. Finally, strengthdescribes the level of toughness and masculinity of a brand. The validity of results improves if they are replicated withother studies and with varying research methodologies. To thisend, the resulting set of personality traits was tested andadapted with a complementary study that includes face-to-faceinterviews with about 60 luxury insiders, who were asked todescribe their associations with several luxury brand printadverts first in their own words and then with the help of thepre-existing personality traits. Results include the first comprehensive overview of luxurybrand personality traits categorized by the five majorpersonality dimensions. Altogether, there are 52 luxury brandpersonality traits including for example “traditional,history-charged, time-honored” and “modern, future- conscious,progressive”. For researchers, these findings offer a foundationfor further research on luxury brand personality and analyzingits antecedents and consequences. Because of the focus onGermany, the complexity of the subject and changes in theluxury symbolism over time, the resulting set of traits cannotbe seen as a generally applicable, static and final solution. Forexample, the trait catalogue could be verified and adapted by additional empirical studies for specific luxury industries,consumer segments or for other countries. In addition, the setof traits provides a basis for the verification of the personalitydimensions with a quantitative consumer survey according tothe approach of Aaker and for analyses about specific traitcombinations, binary oppositions or comprehensive personalityprofiles. The categorization of luxury brand personality traitsprovides marketers a framework for the analysis of emotionalluxury brand images and the development of a luxury brandpersonality, so to say its “aura”, “magic” or “DNA”.
참고문헌 (37)
- Aaker, D. A., "Brands" (1996), The Free Press
- Aaker, J. L., "Dimensions of brand personality", Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), pp.347~356 (1997)
- Austin, J. R., "A re-examination of the generalizability of the Aaker brand personality measurement framework", Journal of Strategic Marketing, 11(2), pp.77~92 (2003)
- Dubois, B., "The market for luxury goods : Income versus culture", European Journal of Marketing, 27(1), pp.34~44 (1993)
- Dubois, B., "Consumer segments based on attitudes toward luxury : empirical evidence from twenty countries", Marketing Letters, 16(2), pp.115~128 (2005)
- Consumer Rapport to Luxury: Analyzing Complex and Ambivalent Attitudes, "Dubois, B.", HEC School of Management, ~, pp.working paper no. 736 (2001)
- Durgee, J. F., "Depth-interview techniques for creative advertising", Journal of Advertising Research, 25(6), pp.29~37 (1986)
- Eden, C., "Using repertory grids for problem construction", Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35(9), pp.779~790 (1984)
- Esch, F. R., "Strategie und Technik der Markenführung" (2008), Vahlen
- "Etude d'une stratégie du luxe – Stratégie de Dior" (2005)[URL]
- Fisher, R., "Removing social desirability bias with indirect questioning: Is the cure worse than the disease?", Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1), pp.563~567 (1998)
- Fromm, M., "Introduction to the Repertory Grid Interview" (2004), Waxmann
- Haire, M., "Projective techniques in marketing research", Journal of Marketing, 14(5), pp.649~656 (1950)
- Heine, K., "Using personal and online repertory grid methods for the development of a luxury brand personality", The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 7(1), pp.25~38 (2009)
- Heine, K., "A Theory-based and Consumer-oriented Concept of Luxury Brands", Presented at the In Pursuit of Luxury Conference (2010)
- Heine, K., "Identification and Motivation of Participants for Luxury Consumer Surveys", Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies (2010)
- Heine, K., "Practicable Value-Cascade Positioning of Luxury Fashion Brands", Proceedings of the 9th International Marketing Trends Conference (2010)
- Hofstede, G., "Behaviors. Institutions and Organizations Across Nations" (2001), Sage Publications
- John, O.P., "Handbook of Personality" (1999), The Guilford Press
- John, O. P., "The lexical approach to personality: a historic review of trait taxonomy research", European Journal of Personality, (2), pp.171~203 (1988)
- Kapferer, J. N., "The New Strategic Brand Management" (2008), Kogan Page
- Kelly, G. A., "The Psychology of Personal Constructs" (1955), W. W. Norton & Company
- Kisabaka, L., "Marketing für Luxusprodukte", 박사, pp.2001
- Lipovetsky, G., "Le Luxe Éternel: De l’âge du sacré au temps des marques" (2003), Éditions Gallimard
- Mäder, R., "Messung und Steuerung von Markenpersönlichkeit: Entwicklung eines Messinstruments und Anwendung in der Werbung mit prominenten Testimonials", 박사, pp.2005
- Mayring, P., "Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung" (2002), Beltz
- Mutscheller, P. M., "Success Factors and Milestones in the Luxury Goods Universe", 박사, pp.1992
- Ourahmoune, N., "Gender values and brand communication: the transfer of masculine representations to brand narratives", European Advances in Consumer Research, 8, pp.181~188 (2008)
- Reynolds, T. J., "Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation", Journal of Advertising Research, 28(1), pp.11~31 (1988)
- Schwartz, S. H., "Universals in the content and structure of values : theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries", Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(1), pp.1~65 (1992)
- Siguaw, J. A., "The brand personality scale : an application for restaurants", Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 6, pp.48~55 (1999)
- Trommsdorff, V., "Das Marketing von luxusprodukten", WISU – Das Wirtschaftsstudium, 37, pp.1669~1674 (2008)
- Valtin, A., "Der Wert von Luxusmarken", 박사, pp.2004
- La Banalisation Du Luxe, "Vernier, E.", Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale, ~, pp.working paper, No. 121 (2006)
- Vickers, J. S., "The marketing of luxury goods : An exploratory study – three conceptual dimensions", The Marketing Review, 3(4), pp.459~478 (2003)
- Vigneron, F., "Review and a conceptual framework of prestige-seeking consumer behavior", Academy of Marketing Science, 3(1) (1999)
- Vigneron, F., "Measuring perceptions of brand luxury", Journal of Brand Management, 11, pp.484~506 (2004)
