Comparison of Bioethanol Production by Candida molischiana and Saccharomyces cerevisiae from Glucose, Cellobiose, and Cellulose
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Bioethanol has attracted much attention in recent decades as a sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative energy source. In this study, we compared the production of bioethanol by Candida molischiana and Saccharomyces cerevisiae at different initial concentrations of cellobiose and glucose. The results showed that C. molischiana can utilize both glucose and cellobiose, whereas S. cerevisiae can only utilize glucose. The ethanol yields were 43-51% from different initial concentrations of carbon source. In addition, different concentrations of microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel) were directly converted to ethanol by a combination of Trichoderma reesei and two yeasts. Cellulose was first hydrolyzed by a fully enzymatic saccharification process using T. reesei cellulases, and the reducing sugars and glucose produced during the process were further used as carbon source for bioethanol production by C. molischiana or S. cerevisiae. Sequential culture of T. reesei and two yeasts revealed that C. molischiana was more efficient for bioconversion of sugars to ethanol than S. cerevisiae. When 20 g/l Avicel was used as a carbon source, the maximum reducing sugar, glucose, and ethanol yields were 42%, 26%, and 20%, respectively. The maximum concentrations of reducing sugar, glucose, and ethanol were 10.9, 8.57, and 5.95 g/l, respectively, at 120 h by the combination of T. reesei and C. molischiana from 50 g/l Avicel.
Abstract
Bioethanol has attracted much attention in recent decades as a sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative energy source. In this study, we compared the production of bioethanol by Candida molischiana and Saccharomyces cerevisiae at different initial concentrations of cellobiose and glucose. The results showed that C. molischiana can utilize both glucose and cellobiose, whereas S. cerevisiae can only utilize glucose. The ethanol yields were 43-51% from different initial concentrations of carbon source. In addition, different concentrations of microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel) were directly converted to ethanol by a combination of Trichoderma reesei and two yeasts. Cellulose was first hydrolyzed by a fully enzymatic saccharification process using T. reesei cellulases, and the reducing sugars and glucose produced during the process were further used as carbon source for bioethanol production by C. molischiana or S. cerevisiae. Sequential culture of T. reesei and two yeasts revealed that C. molischiana was more efficient for bioconversion of sugars to ethanol than S. cerevisiae. When 20 g/l Avicel was used as a carbon source, the maximum reducing sugar, glucose, and ethanol yields were 42%, 26%, and 20%, respectively. The maximum concentrations of reducing sugar, glucose, and ethanol were 10.9, 8.57, and 5.95 g/l, respectively, at 120 h by the combination of T. reesei and C. molischiana from 50 g/l Avicel.
참고문헌 (28)
- "Advancing the global renewable energy transition. Renewables 2018 global status report in perspective" (2018)[URL]
- Kumar A, "Microbial biofuels: a solution to carbon emissions and energy crisis,", Front. Biosci. (Landmrk Ed), 23, pp.1789~1802 (2018)
- Olsson L, "Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production", Enzyme Microb. Technol, 18, pp.312~331 (1996)
- Fulton L, "Biofuels for transport: an international perspective", pp.13~ (2004), International Energy Agency
- Shailesh S. Sawant, "Lignocellulosic and marine biomass as resource for production of polyhydroxyalkanoates", Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 33(5), pp.1505~1513 (2016), 한국화학공학회[DOI]
- Saini JK, "Lignocellulosic agriculture wastes as biomass feedstocks for second-generation bioethanol production : concepts and recent developments", 3 Biotech, 5, pp.337~353 (2015)
- Lin Y, "Factors affecting ethanol fermentation using Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4742", Biomass Bioenerg, 47, pp.395~401 (2012)
- Ortiz Muniz B, "Kinetic study on ethanol production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae ITV-01 yeast isolated from sugar cane molasses", J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol, 85, pp.1361~1367 (2010)
- Prasertwasu S, "Efficient process for ethanol production from Thai Mission grass(Pennisetum polystachion)", Bioresour. Technol, 163, pp.152~159 (2014)
- Freer SN, "Fermentation and aerobic metabolism of cyclodextrins", Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 57, pp.655~659 (1991)
- Geiger MR, "A thermostable Candida molischiana mutant capable of ethanol production at elevated temperatures", J. Pure Appl. Microbiol, 8, pp.1743~1748 (2014)
- Olson DG, "Recent progress in consolidated bioprocessing", Curr. Opin. Biotechnol, 23, pp.396~405 (2011)
- Bhadana B, "Bioethanol production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae with different perspectives : Substrates, growth variables, inhibitor reduction and immobilization", Ferment. Technol, 5, pp.2~ (2016)
- Bu Y, "Direct ethanol production from cellulose by consortium of Trichoderma reesei and Candida molischiana", Green Process Synth, 8, pp.416~420 (2019)
- Wen ZY, "Hydrolysis of animal manure lignocellulosics for reducing sugar production", Bioresour. Technol, 91, pp.31~39 (2004)
- Peterson R, "Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30-thirty years of strain improvement", Microbiology, 158, pp.58~68 (2012)
- Anoth Maharjan, "Fusion of Carbohydrate Binding Modules to Bifunctional Cellulase to Enhance Binding Affinity and Cellulolytic Activity", Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 23(1), pp.79~85 (2018), 한국생물공학회
- Rana V, "On-site enzymes produced from Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 and Aspergillus saccharolyticus for hydrolysis of wet exploded corn stover and loblolly pine", Bioresour. Technol, 154, pp.282~289 (2014)
- Jäger G, "Practical screening of purified cellobiohydrolases and endoglucanases with α-cellulose and specification of hydrodynamics", Biotechnol. Biofuels, 3, pp.18~ (2010)
- Peciulyte A, "Morphology and enzyme production of Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30 are affected by the physical and structural characteristics of cellulosic substrates", Fungal Genet Biol, 72, pp.64~72 (2014)
- Vance I, "Extracellular cellulase production by Sporocytophaga myxococcoides NCIB 8639", J. Gen. Microbiol, 117, pp.235~241 (1980)
- Sawant SS, "Potential of Saccharophagus degradans for production of polyhydroxyalkanoates using cellulose", Process Biochem, 57, pp.50~56 (2017)
- Gondé P, "Fermentation of cellodextrins by different yeast strains", Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 48, pp.265~269 (1984)
- Argyros DA, "High ethanol titers from cellulose by using metabolically engineered thermophilic, anaerobic microbes", Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 77, pp.8288~8294 (2011)
- Liu YK, "Producing bioethanol from cellulosic hydrolyzate via co-immobilized cultivation strategy", J. Biosci. Bioeng, 114, pp.198~203 (2012)
- Panagiotou G, "Studying the ability of Fusarium oxysporum and recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae to efficiently cooperate in decomposition and ethanolic fermentation of wheat straw", Biomass Bioenerg, 35, pp.3727~3732 (2011)
- Park EY, "One-pot bioethanol production from cellulose by co-culture of Acremonium cellulolyticus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae", Biotechnol. Biofuels, 5(1), pp.64~ (2012)
- Singh N, "Cellulosic ethanol production via consolidated bioprocessing by a novel thermophilic anaerobic bacterium isolated from a Himalayan hot spring", Biotechnol. Biofuels, 10, pp.73~ (2017)
