본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Advances in Accurate Microbial Genome- Editing CRISPR Technologies

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류생물학

초록

Previous studies have modified microbial genomes by introducing gene cassettes containing selectable markers and homologous DNA fragments. However, this requires several steps including homologous recombination and excision of unnecessary DNA regions, such as selectable markers from the modified genome. Further, genomic manipulation often leaves scars and traces that interfere with downstream iterative genome engineering. A decade ago, the CRISPR/Cas system (also known as the bacterial adaptive immune system) revolutionized genome editing technology. Among the various CRISPR nucleases of numerous bacteria and archaea, the Cas9 and Cas12a (Cpf1) systems have been largely adopted for genome editing in all living organisms due to their simplicity, as they consist of a single polypeptide nuclease with a target-recognizing RNA. However, accurate and fine-tuned genome editing remains challenging due to mismatch tolerance and protospacer adjacent motif (PAM)-dependent target recognition. Therefore, this review describes how to overcome the aforementioned hurdles, which especially affect genome editing in higher organisms. Additionally, the biological significance of CRISPR-mediated microbial genome editing is discussed, and future research and development directions are also proposed.

Abstract

Previous studies have modified microbial genomes by introducing gene cassettes containing selectable markers and homologous DNA fragments. However, this requires several steps including homologous recombination and excision of unnecessary DNA regions, such as selectable markers from the modified genome. Further, genomic manipulation often leaves scars and traces that interfere with downstream iterative genome engineering. A decade ago, the CRISPR/Cas system (also known as the bacterial adaptive immune system) revolutionized genome editing technology. Among the various CRISPR nucleases of numerous bacteria and archaea, the Cas9 and Cas12a (Cpf1) systems have been largely adopted for genome editing in all living organisms due to their simplicity, as they consist of a single polypeptide nuclease with a target-recognizing RNA. However, accurate and fine-tuned genome editing remains challenging due to mismatch tolerance and protospacer adjacent motif (PAM)-dependent target recognition. Therefore, this review describes how to overcome the aforementioned hurdles, which especially affect genome editing in higher organisms. Additionally, the biological significance of CRISPR-mediated microbial genome editing is discussed, and future research and development directions are also proposed.

참고문헌 (107)

  1. Ishino Y, "Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product", J. Bacteriol, 169, pp.5429~5433 (1987)
  2. Mojica FJ, "Biological significance of a family of regularly spaced repeats in the genomes of archaea, bacteria and mitochondria", Mol. Microbiol, 36, pp.244~246 (2000)
  3. Jansen R, "Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes", Mol. Microbiol, 43, pp.1565~1575 (2002)
  4. Mojica FJ, "Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements", J. Mol. Evol, 60, pp.174~182 (2005)
  5. Barrangou R, "CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes", Science, 315, pp.1709~1712 (2007)
  6. Horvath P, "CRISPR", Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea, 2010, pp.327, 167~170
  7. Jinek M, "A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity", Science, 337, pp.816~821 (2012)
  8. Adli M, "The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond", Nat. Commun, 9, pp.1911~ (2018)
  9. Sapranauskas R, "The Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR", Cas system provides immunity in Escherichia coli, 2011, pp.39, 9275~9282
  10. Ran FA, "In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9", Nature, 520, pp.186~191 (2015)
  11. Esvelt KM, "Orthogonal Cas9 proteins for RNA-guided gene regulation and editing", Nat. Methods, 10, pp.1116~1121 (2013)
  12. Hou Z, "Efficient genome engineering in human pluripotent stem cells using Cas9 from Neisseria meningitidis", Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, pp.15644~15649 (2013)
  13. Hirano H, "Structure and engineering of Francisella novicida Cas9", Cell, 164, pp.950~961 (2016)
  14. Kim E, "In vivo genome editing with a small Cas9 orthologue derived from Campylobacter jejuni", Nat. Commun, 8, pp.14500~ (2017)
  15. Mali P, "RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9", Science, 339, pp.823~826 (2013)
  16. Cong L, "Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR", Cas systems, 2013, pp.339, 819~823
  17. Jiang W, "Demonstration of CRISPR", Cas9, Nucleic Acids Res, pp.2013, 41[DOI]
  18. Wang H, "One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR", Cas-mediated genome engineering, 2013, pp.153, 910~918
  19. Cho SW, "Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease", Nat. Biotechnol, 31, pp.230~232 (2013)
  20. Gonzalez MN, "Reduced enzymatic browning in potato tubers by specific editing of a polyphenol oxidase gene via ribonucleoprotein complexes delivery of the CRISPR", Cas9 system, 2019, pp.10, 1649~
  21. Cyranoski D, "CRISPR gene-editing tested in a person for the first time", Nature, 539, pp.479~ (2016)
  22. Reyrat JM, "Counterselectable markers : untapped tools for bacterial genetics and pathogenesis", Infect. Immun, 66, pp.4011~4017 (1998)
  23. Jager W, "Expression of the Bacillus subtilis sacB gene leads to sucrose sensitivity in the gram-positive bacterium Corynebacterium glutamicum but not in Streptomyces lividans", J. Bacteriol, 174, pp.5462~5465 (1992)
  24. Schafer A, "Small mobilizable multi-purpose cloning vectors derived from the Escherichia coli plasmids pK18 and pK19 : selection of defined deletions in the chromosome of Corynebacterium glutamicum", Gene, 145, pp.69~73 (1994)
  25. Kolisnychenko V, "Engineering a reduced Escherichia coli genome", Genome Res, 12, pp.640~647 (2002)
  26. Pyne ME, "Coupling the CRISPR", Cas9 system with lambda red recombineering enables simplified chromosomal gene replacement in Escherichia coli, 2015, pp.81, 5103~5114
  27. Datsenko KA, "One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products", Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, pp.6640~6645 (2000)
  28. Baba T, "Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants : the Keio collection", Mol. Syst. Biol, 2, pp.2006.0008~ (2006)
  29. Swingle B, "Oligonucleotide recombination in Gramnegative bacteria", Mol. Microbiol, 75, pp.138~148 (2010)
  30. Fabret C, "A new mutation delivery system for genome-scale approaches in Bacillus subtilis", Mol. Microbiol, 46, pp.25~36 (2002)
  31. Fedoryshyn M, "Functional expression of the Cre recombinase in actinomycetes", Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol, 78, pp.1065~1070 (2008)
  32. Sang-Hyun Lee, "Single Crossover-Mediated Markerless Genome Engineering in Clostridium acetobutylicum", Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 26(4), pp.725~729 (2016), 한국미생물·생명공학회[DOI]
  33. Wyman C, "DNA double-strand break repair : All's well that ends well", Annu. Rev. Genet, 40, pp.363~383 (2006)
  34. Jin H, "FOXL2 directs DNA double-strand break repair pathways by differentially interacting with Ku", Nat. Commun, 11, pp.2010~ (2020)
  35. Della M, "Mycobacterial Ku and ligase proteins constitute a two-component NHEJ repair machine", Science, 306, pp.683~685 (2004)
  36. Stephanou NC, "Mycobacterial nonhomologous end joining mediates mutagenic repair of chromosomal double-strand DNA breaks", J. Bacteriol, 189, pp.5237~5246 (2007)
  37. Zhu H, "Gap filling activities of Pseudomonas DNA Ligase D(LigD)polymerase and functional interactions of LigD with the DNA end-binding Ku protein", J. Biol. Chem, 285, pp.4815~4825 (2010)
  38. de Vega M, "The minimal Bacillus subtilis nonhomologous end joining repair machinery", PLoS One, 8, pp.e64232~ (2013)
  39. Bertrand C, "Bacterial NHEJ : a never ending story", Mol. Microbiol, 111, pp.1139~1151 (2019)
  40. Selle K, "Harnessing CRISPR-Cas systems for bacterial genome editing", Trends Microbiol, 23, pp.225~232 (2015)
  41. Cobb RE, "High-efficiency multiplex genome editing of Streptomyces species using an engineered CRISPR", Cas system, 2015, pp.4, 723~728
  42. Jiang W, "RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems", Nat. Biotechnol, 31, pp.233~239 (2013)
  43. Huang H, "One-step high-efficiency CRISPR", Cas9-mediated genome editing in Streptomyces, 2015, pp.47, 231~243
  44. 이남일, "Synthetic Biology Tools for Novel Secondary Metabolite Discovery in Streptomyces", Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 29(5), pp.667~686 (2019), 한국미생물·생명공학회[DOI]
  45. Guo T, "A rapid and versatile tool for genomic engineering in Lactococcus lactis", Microb. Cell Fact, 18, pp.22~ (2019)
  46. Wirth NT, "Accelerated genome engineering of Pseudomonas putida by I-SceI-mediated recombination and CRISPR-Cas9 counterselection", Microb. Biotechnol, 13, pp.233~249 (2020)
  47. Zhang J, "Efficient multiplex genome editing in Streptomyces via engineered CRISPRCas12a systems", Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol, 8, pp.726~ (2020)
  48. Feng X, "CRISPR", Cas9 assisted multiplex genome editing technique in Escherichia coli, 2018, pp.13, e1700604~
  49. Choe D, "Adaptive laboratory evolution of a genome-reduced Escherichia coli", Nat. Commun, 10, pp.935~ (2019)
  50. Darmon E, "Bacterial genome instability", Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev, 78, pp.1~39 (2014)
  51. Liu J, "Development of a CRISPR", Cas9 genome editing toolbox for Corynebacterium glutamicum, 2017, pp.16, 205~
  52. Ungerer J, "Cpf1 is a versatile tool for CRISPR genome editing across diverse species of cyanobacteria", Sci. Rep, 6, pp.39681~ (2016)
  53. Altenbuchner J, "Editing of the Bacillus subtilis genome by the CRISPR-Cas9 system", Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 82, pp.5421~5427 (2016)
  54. Oh JH, "CRISPR-Cas9-assisted recombineering in Lactobacillus reuteri", Nucleic Acids Res, 42, pp.e131~ (2014)
  55. Yan MY, "CRISPR-Cas12a-assisted recombineering in bacteria", Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 83, pp.e00947~00917 (2017)
  56. Ao X, "A multiplex genome editing method for Escherichia coli based on CRISPR-Cas12a", Front. Microbiol, 9, pp.2307~ (2018)
  57. Reisch CR, "The no-SCAR(Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering)system for genome editing in Escherichia coli", Sci. Rep, 5, pp.15096~ (2015)
  58. Leenay RT, "Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 in Lactobacillus plantarum revealed that editing outcomes can vary across strains and between methods", Biotechnol. J, 14, pp.e1700583~ (2019)
  59. Li J, "Coupling ssDNA recombineering with CRISPR-Cas9 for Escherichia coli DnaG mutations", Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol, 103, pp.3559~3570 (2019)
  60. Wang Y, "Bacterial genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 : Deletion, integration, single nucleotide modification, and desirable"Clean"mutant selection in Clostridium beijerinckii as an example", ACS Synth. Biol, 5, pp.721~732 (2016)
  61. Wang X, "Making point mutations in Escherichia coli BL21 genome using the CRISPR-Cas9 system", FEMS Microbiol. Lett, 365 (2018)[DOI]
  62. Yao R, "CRISPR-Cas9", Cas12a biotechnology and application in bacteria, 2018, pp.3, 135~149
  63. Jiang Y, "CRISPR-Cpf1 assisted genome editing of Corynebacterium glutamicum", Nat. Commun, 8, pp.15179~ (2017)
  64. Deveau H, "Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus", J. Bacteriol, 190, pp.1390~1400 (2008)
  65. Mojica FJM, "Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system", Microbiology(Reading), 155, pp.733~740 (2009)
  66. Gasiunas G, "A catalogue of biochemically diverse CRISPR-Cas9 orthologs", Nat. Commun, 11, pp.5512~ (2020)
  67. Wang J, "Structural and mechanistic basis of PAM-dependent spacer acquisition in CRISPR-Cas systems", Cell, 163, pp.840~853 (2015)
  68. Collias D, "CRISPR technologies and the search for the PAM-free nuclease", Nat. Commun, 12, pp.555~ (2021)
  69. Karvelis T, "Harnessing the natural diversity and in vitro evolution of Cas9 to expand the genome editing toolbox", Curr. Opin. Microbiol, 37, pp.88~94 (2017)
  70. Nishimasu H, "Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA", Cell, 156, pp.935~949 (2014)
  71. Kleinstiver BP, "Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities", Nature, 523, pp.481~485 (2015)
  72. Gao L, "Engineered Cpf1 variants with altered PAM specificities", Nat. Biotechnol, 35, pp.789~792 (2017)
  73. Hu JH, "Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity", Nature, 556, pp.57~63 (2018)
  74. Nishimasu H, "Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease with expanded targeting space", Science, 361, pp.1259~1262 (2018)
  75. Kim B, "Regulation of microbial metabolic rates using CRISPR interference with expanded PAM sequences", Front. Microbiol, 11, pp.282~ (2020)
  76. 김범준, "Effective Blocking of Microbial Transcriptional Initiation by dCas9-NGMediated CRISPR Interference", Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 30(12), pp.1919~1926 (2020), 한국미생물·생명공학회[DOI]
  77. Li D, "Battling CRISPR-Cas9 off-target genome editing", Cell. Biol. Toxicol, 35, pp.403~406 (2019)
  78. Fu BX, "Distinct patterns of Cas9 mismatch tolerance in vitro and in vivo", Nucleic Acids Res, 44, pp.5365~5377 (2016)
  79. Lin YN, "CRISPR", Cas9 systems have off-target activity with insertions or deletions between target DNA and guide RNA sequences, 2014, pp.42, 7473~7485
  80. Chen SJ, "Minimizing off-target effects in CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing", Cell. Biol. Toxicol, 35, pp.399~401 (2019)
  81. Chapman JR, "Playing the end game : DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice", Mol. Cell, 47, pp.497~510 (2012)
  82. Komor AC, "Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without doublestranded DNA cleavage", Nature, 533, pp.420~424 (2016)
  83. Kim D, "Genome-wide specificity of dCpf1 cytidine base editors", Nat. Commun, 11, pp.4072~ (2020)
  84. Grunewald J, "CRISPR DNA base editors with reduced RNA off-target and self-editing activities", Nat. Biotechnol, 37, pp.1041~1048 (2019)
  85. Jeong YK, "Current status and challenges of DNA base editing tools", Mol. Ther, 28, pp.1938~1952 (2020)
  86. Lee SS, "Single C-to-T substitution using engineered APOBEC3G-nCas9 base editors with minimum genome-and transcriptome-wide off-target effects", Sci. Adv, 6, pp.eaba1773~ (2020)
  87. Sun J, "CRISPR-assisted multiplex base editing system in Pseudomonas putida KT2440", Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol, 8, pp.905~ (2020)
  88. Anzalone AV, "Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA", Nature, 576, pp.149~157 (2019)
  89. Yang L, "A tale of two moieties : Rapidly evolving CRISPR", Cas-based genome editing, 2020, pp.45, 874~888
  90. Arroyo-Olarte RD, "Genome editing in bacteria : CRISPR-Cas and beyond", Microorganisms, 9, pp.844~ (2021)
  91. Fu YF, "Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs", Nat. Biotechnol, 32, pp.279~284 (2014)
  92. Li P, "Allele-specific CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing of the single-base P23H mutation for rhodopsin-associated dominant retinitis pigmentosa", CRISPR J, 1, pp.55~64 (2018)
  93. Park HM, "Extension of the crRNA enhances Cpf1 gene editing in vitro and in vivo", Nat. Commun, 9, pp.3313~ (2018)
  94. McMahon MA, "Chemically modified Cpf1-CRISPR RNAs mediate efficient genome editing in mammalian cells", Mol. Ther, 26, pp.1228~1240 (2018)
  95. Bin Moon S, "Highly efficient genome editing by CRISPR-Cpf1 using CRISPR RNA with a uridinylate-rich 3'-overhang", Nat. Commun, 9, pp.3651~ (2018)
  96. Anderson EM, "Systematic analysis of CRISPR-Cas9 mismatch tolerance reveals low levels of off-target activity", J. Biotechnol, 211, pp.56~65 (2015)
  97. Lee HJ, "CRISPR-Cas9-mediated pinpoint microbial genome editing aided by target-mismatched sgRNAs", Genome Res, 30, pp.768~775 (2020)
  98. 김현주, "Single-Base Genome Editing in Corynebacterium glutamicum with the Help of Negative Selection by Target-Mismatched CRISPR", Cpf1, 2020, pp.30(10), 1583~1591[DOI]
  99. Lee HJ, "Mismatch intolerance of 5′-truncated sgRNAs in CRISPR", Cas9 enables efficient microbial single-base genome editing, 2021, pp.22, 6457~
  100. Song B, "Analysis of NHEJ-based DNA repair after CRISPR-mediated DNA cleavage", Int. J. Mol. Sci, 22, pp.6397~ (2021)
  101. Rodrigues SD, "Efficient CRISPR-mediated base editing in Agrobacterium spp", Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, pp.e2013338118~ (2021)
  102. Hayashi A, "Short-homology-mediated CRISPR", Cas9-based method for genome editing in fission yeast, 2019, pp.9, 1153~1163
  103. Zhang J, "De Novo engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for L-proline production", ACS Synth. Biol, 9, pp.1897~1906 (2020)
  104. Shen W, "Establishment and application of a CRISPR-Cas12a assisted genomeediting system in Zymomonas mobilis", Microb. Cell Fact, 18, pp.162~ (2019)
  105. Zhou D, "CRISPR", Cas9-assisted seamless genome editing in Lactobacillus plantarum and its application in N-acetylglucosamine production, 2019, pp.85, e01367~01319
  106. Krumbach K, "CRISPR", Cas12a mediated genome editing to introduce amino acid substitutions into the mechanosensitive channel MscCG of Corynebacterium glutamicum, 2019, pp.8, 2726~2734
  107. Wege SM, "Versatile CRISPR", Cas9 systems for genome editing in Ustilago maydis, 2021, pp.7, 149~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)