본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

왕안이(王安憶)의 장한가와 상하이 민족지

An-yi Wang’s Changhenge and Shanghai Ethnography

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This research begins from hypothesizing An-yi Wang(王安憶)’s most prominent work Changhenge(長恨歌) is an anthropological ethnography that documents Shanghai’s urban space through participant observation. In order to first examine the possibility of considering a literary work as an ethnography, the research looks into the role of imagination and the mechanism of fictionalization, followed by a review on literature anthropology. Then an overview on the genealogy of Shanghai literature and literary Shanghai was made. History of Shanghai literature is in fact a significant part of China’s modern and contemporary literary history, so much that it is difficult to consider it as an independent realm. On the other hand, ‘literary Shanghai,’ a term designating Shanghai found within the literature and also the literal text which represents Shanghai, is an approach similar to the notion of ‘Shanghai ethnography,’ which is why the research has reviewed several related texts. The research’s main section of ‘Changhange as a Shanghai ethnography’ looks into past results of relative studies and observes the living space from the novel, mainly longtang(弄堂), from a micro-historic point of view. In particular, in its first chapter the novel highlights shikumen(石庫門) and longtang through a distant description. Based on such detailed depiction, the research attempts to reconstruct how Shanghai’s longtang, houses and the streets have changed from 1940s through 1980s. Next the typical life and taste, as well as identity of Shanghai’s men and women were reviewed through Qi-yao Wang(王琪搖) and Mr. Cheng(程) who are the main characters of the novel. In addition, the essence of the character’s way of living this world is summarized as ‘emptiness and vainness’. Cultural thickness of Changhenge as a Shanghai ethnography is characterized as irony and introspection. As an ethnography of literature anthropology, the novel can be interpreted as the author’s astounding satire and sarcasm on Shanghai and on false consciousness of urbanites. There are no self grounds, no soul and no history. The way of living they believed to be wise is ‘empty and vain’. The ‘beauty’ they considered elegant and beautiful are full of secularity and commercialism. Such is a reflection of rootless European culture that were heteronomously transplanted, only revealing their ‘empty and vain’ life. Life of Qi-yao Wang, who enthusiastically performs the death she witnessed at the studio for 4 decades, is ‘emptiness and vainness’ itself. Thus the text is full of ironies. However, observer’s introspection is spotted throughout the text. At times it leads us away from monotonous everyday life towards deep thoughts and at times it prevents us from being lured by superficial phenomenon but look straight into the depths of being. Furthermore it results in a reflection on Shanghai and Shanghainese, or moreover the city and people living in it. In this context, Changhenge is a thick text full of irony and introspection.

Abstract

This research begins from hypothesizing An-yi Wang(王安憶)’s most prominent work Changhenge(長恨歌) is an anthropological ethnography that documents Shanghai’s urban space through participant observation. In order to first examine the possibility of considering a literary work as an ethnography, the research looks into the role of imagination and the mechanism of fictionalization, followed by a review on literature anthropology. Then an overview on the genealogy of Shanghai literature and literary Shanghai was made. History of Shanghai literature is in fact a significant part of China’s modern and contemporary literary history, so much that it is difficult to consider it as an independent realm. On the other hand, ‘literary Shanghai,’ a term designating Shanghai found within the literature and also the literal text which represents Shanghai, is an approach similar to the notion of ‘Shanghai ethnography,’ which is why the research has reviewed several related texts. The research’s main section of ‘Changhange as a Shanghai ethnography’ looks into past results of relative studies and observes the living space from the novel, mainly longtang(弄堂), from a micro-historic point of view. In particular, in its first chapter the novel highlights shikumen(石庫門) and longtang through a distant description. Based on such detailed depiction, the research attempts to reconstruct how Shanghai’s longtang, houses and the streets have changed from 1940s through 1980s. Next the typical life and taste, as well as identity of Shanghai’s men and women were reviewed through Qi-yao Wang(王琪搖) and Mr. Cheng(程) who are the main characters of the novel. In addition, the essence of the character’s way of living this world is summarized as ‘emptiness and vainness’. Cultural thickness of Changhenge as a Shanghai ethnography is characterized as irony and introspection. As an ethnography of literature anthropology, the novel can be interpreted as the author’s astounding satire and sarcasm on Shanghai and on false consciousness of urbanites. There are no self grounds, no soul and no history. The way of living they believed to be wise is ‘empty and vain’. The ‘beauty’ they considered elegant and beautiful are full of secularity and commercialism. Such is a reflection of rootless European culture that were heteronomously transplanted, only revealing their ‘empty and vain’ life. Life of Qi-yao Wang, who enthusiastically performs the death she witnessed at the studio for 4 decades, is ‘emptiness and vainness’ itself. Thus the text is full of ironies. However, observer’s introspection is spotted throughout the text. At times it leads us away from monotonous everyday life towards deep thoughts and at times it prevents us from being lured by superficial phenomenon but look straight into the depths of being. Furthermore it results in a reflection on Shanghai and Shanghainese, or moreover the city and people living in it. In this context, Changhenge is a thick text full of irony and introspection.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 기어츠, 클리퍼드, "문화의해석" (1998), 까치
  2. 바오야밍, "소비공간‘바’와노스탤지어의정치, In 21세기중국의문화지도―포스트사회주의중국의문화연구" (2009), 현실문화연구
  3. 쑤퉁, "홍분" (2007), 아고라
  4. 아파두라이, 아르준, "고삐풀린현대성" (2004), 현실문화연구
  5. 왕샤오밍, "건축에서광고까지: 최근15년간상하이의공간변화, In 21세기중국의문화지도―포스트사회주의중국의문화연구" (2009), 현실문화연구
  6. 왕안이, "장한가(1⋅2)" (2009), 은행나무
  7. 임춘성, "소설로보는현대중국" (1995), 종로서적
  8. 하트, 마이클, "들뢰즈사상의진화" (2004), 갈무리
  9. 한국문화인류학회, "처음만나는문화인류학" (2003), 일조각
  10. 홍석준, "동아시아의 문화와 문화적 정체성", pp.1~163 (2008), 목포대학교
  11. 황수민, "린마을이야기―어느공산당간부의눈을통해본한중국마을의변화" (2003), 이산
  12. 邱明正主編, "上海文學通史(上下)" (2005), 復旦大學出版社
  13. 南帆, "城市的肖像―讀王安憶的長恨歌", 小說評論, 1 (1998)
  14. 張新潁, "王安憶硏究資料(下)" (2009), 天津人民出版社
  15. 范伯群, "中國現代通俗文學史" (2007), 北京大學出版社
  16. 徐新建, "人類學寫作" (2010), 四川大學出版社
  17. 楊劍龍, "上海文化與上海文學" (2007), 上海人民出版社
  18. 楊揚, "海派文學" (2008), 文匯出版社
  19. 葉舒憲, "文學人類學敎程" (2010), 中國社會科學出版社
  20. 沃爾夫岡, "虛構與想像―文學人類學疆界" (2011), 吉林人民出版社
  21. 王德威, "小說中國―晩晴到當代的中文小說" (1993), 麥田出版
  22. 王德威, "如此繁華" (2006), 上海書店出版社
  23. 王安憶, "尋找上海" (2001), 學林出版社
  24. 王安憶, "長恨歌" (1995), 作家出版社
  25. 王曉明, "六分天下: 今天的中國文學", 文學評論, 5 (2011)
  26. 劉珩, "文學的人類學硏究範式―評漢德勒和西格", 文藝硏究, 7 (2011), 簡⋅粵斯汀以及文化的虛構
  27. 張新潁, "王安憶硏究資料(上⋅下)" (2009), 天津人民出版社
  28. 張新潁, "王安憶硏究資料(上⋅下)" (2009), 天津人民出版社
  29. 張旭東, "批評的蹤迹: 文化理論與文化批評 1985~2002" (2003), 三聯書店
  30. 曾軍, "觀看上海的方式", 人文雜誌, 3 (2009)
  31. 陳伯海, "上海近代文學史" (1993), 上海人民出版社
  32. 陳思和, "中國現當代文學名篇十五講" (2003), 北京大學出版社
  33. 陳靑生, "畵說上海文學" (2009), 上海文藝出版社
  34. 七格, "神聖書寫帝國" (2010), 上海書店出版社
  35. Zhang, Xudong, "Postsocialism and Cultural Politics: China in the Last Decade of the Twentieth Century" (2008), Duke University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)