頤和園의 黃昏, ‘6⋅4 천안문세대’의 ‘靑春’을 위한 追念 ― 로우예(婁燁)의 영화 『頤和園』 읽기
The Twilight of the Summer Palace, a Tribute to the ‘Youth’ of the ‘June Fourth Tian’anmen Square Generation’: Reading Lou Ye’s Film Summer Palace
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper offers a re-reading of Lou Ye’s Summer Palace by focusing on the film’s implied social and historical contexts. Directed by one of the leading representatives of China’s “sixth generation,” Summer Palace courted controversy when the director’s decision to submit it to 2006 Cannes International Film Festival without first seeking the permission of the Chinese government led to the film’s ban in China. The highly explicit sexual content of the film and the repeated references to the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 in the background generated further heat in critical evaluations of the film. Such overwhelming attention paid to peripheral or extra-textual aspects of the film, however, has tended to occlude a view of the problematic that lies at the heart of the film: a reinterpretation of the events of the late 1980s and the trauma generated by those events in the context of the changes that have taken place in the role assumed by the category of “the youth” in China’s contemporary history. Pioneers in the “inexorable” progress of history, “the youth” had shouldered a heavy burden and played a symbolic role at every critical juncture in contemporary Chinese history, and yet “the youth” of the 1980s could no longer convince themselves or others of the validity of the very category to which they claimed membership. Summer Palace attests to this confusionin the generation’s self-definition. Suffering from a sense of isolation and impotence in these anomic times, the young protagonists of the film turn to sex as much for a means of communicating with one another as for a way to express passive resistance against the oppressive moral authority of the times. In the form of a retrospective confession, Summer Palace thus invokes the memory of resistance and wandering experienced by the youth of the 1980s—a generation to which Lou Ye himself belongs—in order to bring into sharp focus the trauma that still lingers from the times gone by.
Abstract
This paper offers a re-reading of Lou Ye’s Summer Palace by focusing on the film’s implied social and historical contexts. Directed by one of the leading representatives of China’s “sixth generation,” Summer Palace courted controversy when the director’s decision to submit it to 2006 Cannes International Film Festival without first seeking the permission of the Chinese government led to the film’s ban in China. The highly explicit sexual content of the film and the repeated references to the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 in the background generated further heat in critical evaluations of the film. Such overwhelming attention paid to peripheral or extra-textual aspects of the film, however, has tended to occlude a view of the problematic that lies at the heart of the film: a reinterpretation of the events of the late 1980s and the trauma generated by those events in the context of the changes that have taken place in the role assumed by the category of “the youth” in China’s contemporary history. Pioneers in the “inexorable” progress of history, “the youth” had shouldered a heavy burden and played a symbolic role at every critical juncture in contemporary Chinese history, and yet “the youth” of the 1980s could no longer convince themselves or others of the validity of the very category to which they claimed membership. Summer Palace attests to this confusionin the generation’s self-definition. Suffering from a sense of isolation and impotence in these anomic times, the young protagonists of the film turn to sex as much for a means of communicating with one another as for a way to express passive resistance against the oppressive moral authority of the times. In the form of a retrospective confession, Summer Palace thus invokes the memory of resistance and wandering experienced by the youth of the 1980s—a generation to which Lou Ye himself belongs—in order to bring into sharp focus the trauma that still lingers from the times gone by.
참고문헌 (16)
- 빌헬름 라이히, "파시즘의 대중심리" (2006), 그린비
- 이기훈, "청년, 근대의 표상 ― 1920년대 ‘청년' 담론의 형성과 변화", 문화, 2004, pp.37, ~[DOI]
- 이기훈, "청년, 갈 곳을 잃다: 1930년대 청년담론에 대한 연구", 역사비평, (76), pp.359~386 (2006), 역사문제연구소
- 주창윤, "1970년대 청년문화 세대담론의 정치학", 언론과 사회, 14(3), pp.73~105 (2006), 성곡언론문화재단
- 陳映芳, "在角色与非角色之间:中国的青年文化" (2002), 江苏人民出版社
- 이경훈, "청년의 다이내믹, 청춘의 테크닉 ― 세대 담론의 기원과 그 문학적 변천에 관하여", 문학과 사회 (2005)
- 이병한, "중국 ‘신청년’의 우울한 초상", 말 (2006)
- 조혜영, "지식청년 소재 글쓰기에 나타난 가치관 연구", 중어중문학, 34, pp.485~510 (2004), 한국중어중문학회
- 안효상, "1960년대 청년 급진주의에 관한 스케치", 문화과학, (37) (2004)
- 소영현, "청년과 근대-소년을 중심으로", 한국근대문학연구, (11), pp.42~70 (2005), 한국근대문학회
- 다이진화(戴錦華), "90년대 중국의 문화현실 ― 다이진화(戴錦華) 인터뷰", 문화과학, (37) (2004)
- "<中国第三次「性革命」浪潮>, 『新闻周刊』, 2002年8月30日"[URL]
- 陆汉军, "爱情比生命凄美―评娄烨的电影作品『苏州河』", 南宁师苑高等专科学校学报, 20(2) (2003)
- FBJ, "『颐和园』事件:一场事先张扬的越位故事", 甲壳虫
- 苏七七, "双重阴影下的双重言说―关于娄烨『苏州河』", ~
- 聂伟, "新生代电影与当代都市的文化表达―娄烨论", 杭州师范学院学报(社会科学版) (2005)
