본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of three different endoscopic approaches in the treatment of bladder calculi

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Background: This study compared the following three endoscopic techniques used to treat bladder stones: transurethral cystoscope used with a pneumatic lithoclast or nephroscope used with a pneumatic lithoclast and nephroscope used with an ultrasonic lithoclast. Methods: Between January 2013 and May 2016, 107 patients with bladder stones underwent endoscopic treatment. Patients were classified into three groups based on the endoscopic techniques and energy modalities used in each group as: group 1 (transurethral stone removal using a cystoscope with pneumatic lithoclast), group 2 (transurethral stone removal using a nephroscope with pneumatic lithoclast), and group 3 (transurethral stone removal using a nephroscope with ultrasonic lithoclast). Baseline and perioperative data were retrospectively compared between three groups. Results: No statistically significant intergroup differences were observed in age, sex ratio, and stone size. A statistically significant intergroup difference was observed in the operation time—group 1, 71.3±46.6 min; group 2, 33.0±13.7 min; and group 3, 24.6±8.0 min. All patients showed complete stone clearance. The number of urethral entries was higher in group 1 than in the other groups. Significant complications did not occur in any patient. Conclusion: Nephroscopy scores over cystoscopy for the removal of bladder stones with respect to operation time. Ultrasonic lithoclast is a safe and efficacious modality that scores over a pneumatic lithoclast with respect to the operation time.

Abstract

Background: This study compared the following three endoscopic techniques used to treat bladder stones: transurethral cystoscope used with a pneumatic lithoclast or nephroscope used with a pneumatic lithoclast and nephroscope used with an ultrasonic lithoclast. Methods: Between January 2013 and May 2016, 107 patients with bladder stones underwent endoscopic treatment. Patients were classified into three groups based on the endoscopic techniques and energy modalities used in each group as: group 1 (transurethral stone removal using a cystoscope with pneumatic lithoclast), group 2 (transurethral stone removal using a nephroscope with pneumatic lithoclast), and group 3 (transurethral stone removal using a nephroscope with ultrasonic lithoclast). Baseline and perioperative data were retrospectively compared between three groups. Results: No statistically significant intergroup differences were observed in age, sex ratio, and stone size. A statistically significant intergroup difference was observed in the operation time—group 1, 71.3±46.6 min; group 2, 33.0±13.7 min; and group 3, 24.6±8.0 min. All patients showed complete stone clearance. The number of urethral entries was higher in group 1 than in the other groups. Significant complications did not occur in any patient. Conclusion: Nephroscopy scores over cystoscopy for the removal of bladder stones with respect to operation time. Ultrasonic lithoclast is a safe and efficacious modality that scores over a pneumatic lithoclast with respect to the operation time.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Schwartz BF, "The vesical calculus", Urol Clin North Am, 27, pp.333~346 (2000)
  2. Benway BM, "Campbell-Walsh urology", pp.1291~1299 (2016), Elsevier
  3. Papatsoris AG, "Bladder lithiasis: from open surgery to lithotripsy", Urol Res, 34, pp.163~167 (2006)
  4. Philippou P, "The management of bladder lithiasis in the modern era of endourology", Urology, 79, pp.980~986 (2012)
  5. Viprakasit DP, "Use of resectoscope to aid in bladder stone extraction", Urology, 65, pp.1219~1220 (2005)
  6. Ener K, "The randomized comparison of two different endoscopic techniques in the management of large bladder stones:transurethral use of nephroscope or cystoscope?", J Endourol, 23, pp.1151~1155 (2009)
  7. Torricelli FC, "Surgical management of bladder stones: literature review", Rev Col Bras Cir, 40, pp.227~233 (2013)
  8. Jia Q, "Comparison of 2 kinds of methods for the treatment of bladder calculi", Urology, 114, pp.233~235 (2018)
  9. Kara C, "Transurethral cystolithotripsy with holmium laser under local anesthesia in selected patients", Urology, 74, pp.1000~1003 (2009)
  10. Oktay B, "Intracorporeal pneumatic lithotripsy for ureteral and vesical calculi", Scand J Urol Nephrol, 31, pp.333~336 (1997)
  11. Hofbauer J, "Lithoclast: new and inexpensive mode of intracorporeal lithotripsy", J Endourol, pp.429~432 (1992)
  12. Denstedt JD, "The Swiss Lithoclast: a new device for intracorporeal lithotripsy", J Urol, 148, pp.1088~1090 (1992)
  13. Schulze H, "The Swiss Lithoclast: a new device for endoscopic stone disintegration", J Urol, 149, pp.15~18 (1993)
  14. Bülow H, "Electrohydraulic lithotripsy with aspiration of the fragments under vision--304 consecutive cases", J Urol, 126, pp.454~456 (1981)
  15. Razvi HA, "Management of vesical calculi: comparison of lithotripsy devices", J Endourol, 10, pp.559~563 (1996)
  16. Teichman JM, "Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser cystolithotripsy of large bladder calculi", Urology, 50, pp.44~48 (1997)
  17. Sathaye UV, "Per-urethral endoscopic management of bladder stones: does size matter?", J Endourol, 17, pp.511~512 (2003)
  18. Kawahara T, "Amplatz sheath for cystolithotripsy using Ho: YAG laser in female patients", Urology, 80, pp.1154~1155 (2012)
  19. Singh KJ, "Comparison of three different endoscopic techniques in management of bladder calculi", Indian J Urol, 27, pp.10~13 (2011)
  20. Ali AI, "Transurethral pneumatic cystolithotripsy: a novel approach", J Endourol, 30, pp.671~673 (2016)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)