본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Diagnostic value of serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in discriminating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis: a retrospective study

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Background: Differentiating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis remains a challenge. We aimed to evaluate the value of serum procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in differentiating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis. Methods: Adult patients with three or more episodes of watery diarrhea and colitis symptoms within 14 days of a hospital visit were eligible for this study. The patients’ stool pathogen polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing results, serum PCT levels, and serum CRP levels were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into bacterial and nonbacterial colitis groups according to their PCR. The laboratory data were compared between the two groups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy. Results: In total, 636 patients were included; 186 in the bacterial colitis group and 450 in the nonbacterial colitis group. In the bacterial colitis group, Clostridium perfringens was the commonest pathogen (n=70), followed by Clostridium difficile toxin B (n=60). The AUC for PCT and CRP was 0.557 and 0.567, respectively, indicating poor discrimination. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing bacterial colitis were 54.8% and 52.6% for PCT, and 52.2% and 54.2% for CRP, respectively. Combining PCT and CRP measurements did not increase the discrimination performance (AUC, 0.522; 95% confidence interval, 0.474–0.571). Conclusion: Neither PCT nor CRP helped discriminate bacterial colitis from nonbacterial colitis.

Abstract

Background: Differentiating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis remains a challenge. We aimed to evaluate the value of serum procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in differentiating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis. Methods: Adult patients with three or more episodes of watery diarrhea and colitis symptoms within 14 days of a hospital visit were eligible for this study. The patients’ stool pathogen polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing results, serum PCT levels, and serum CRP levels were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into bacterial and nonbacterial colitis groups according to their PCR. The laboratory data were compared between the two groups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy. Results: In total, 636 patients were included; 186 in the bacterial colitis group and 450 in the nonbacterial colitis group. In the bacterial colitis group, Clostridium perfringens was the commonest pathogen (n=70), followed by Clostridium difficile toxin B (n=60). The AUC for PCT and CRP was 0.557 and 0.567, respectively, indicating poor discrimination. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing bacterial colitis were 54.8% and 52.6% for PCT, and 52.2% and 54.2% for CRP, respectively. Combining PCT and CRP measurements did not increase the discrimination performance (AUC, 0.522; 95% confidence interval, 0.474–0.571). Conclusion: Neither PCT nor CRP helped discriminate bacterial colitis from nonbacterial colitis.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Riddle MS, "ACG clinical guideline : diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of acute diarrheal infections in adults", Am J Gastroenterol, 111, pp.602~622 (2016)
  2. 이효진, "Prescription of Antibiotics for Adults with Acute Infectious Diarrhea in Korea: A Population-based Study", Infection and Chemotherapy, 51(3), pp.295~304 (2019), 대한감염학회[DOI]
  3. Schuetz P, "Procalcitonin algorithms for antibiotic therapy decisions : a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and recommendations for clinical algorithms", Arch Intern Med, 171, pp.1322~1331 (2011)
  4. 김윤정, "Guideline for the Antibiotic Use in Acute Gastroenteritis", Infection and Chemotherapy, 51(2), pp.217~243 (2019), 대한감염학회[DOI]
  5. Humphries RM, "Practical guidance for clinical microbiology laboratories : diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis", Clin Microbiol Rev, 28, pp.3~31 (2015)
  6. Simon L, "Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels as markers of bacterial infection : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Clin Infect Dis, 39, pp.206~217 (2004)
  7. Becker KL, "Clinical review 167 : procalcitonin and the calcitonin gene family of peptides in inflammation, infection, and sepsis : a journey from calcitonin back to its precursors", J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 89, pp.1512~1525 (2004)
  8. 대한감염학회, "소화기계 감염 진료지침 권고안", Infection and Chemotherapy, 42(6), pp.323~361 (2010), 대한감염학회
  9. 송재훈, "항생제 내성의 국내 현황 및 대책", 대한내과학회지, 77(2), pp.143~151 (2009), 대한내과학회
  10. Mohan A, "Biomarkers for the diagnosis of bacterial infections : in pursuit of the ‘Holy Grail’", Indian J Med Res, 141, pp.271~273 (2015)
  11. Wang J, "The diagnostic values of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in identifying systemic lupus erythematosus infection and disease activity", Medicine(Baltimore), 98, pp.e16798~ (2019)
  12. Hyung-Hoon Oh, "Novel biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer", Intestinal research, 18(2), pp.168~183 (2020), 대한장연구학회[DOI]
  13. Samsudin I, "Clinical utility and measurement of procalcitonin", Clin Biochem Rev, 38, pp.59~68 (2017)
  14. Schuetz P, "Procalcitonin and other biomarkers to improve assessment and antibiotic stewardship in infections : hope for hype?", Swiss Med Wkly, 139, pp.318~326 (2009)
  15. Mitaka C, "Clinical laboratory differentiation of infectious versus non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome", Clin Chim Acta, 351, pp.17~29 (2005)
  16. Lee YS, "Procalcitonin as a decision-supporting marker of urgent biliary decompression in acute cholangitis", Dig Dis Sci, 63, pp.2474~2479 (2018)
  17. Rau B, "The potential role of procalcitonin and interleukin 8 in the prediction of infected necrosis in acute pancreatitis", Gut, 41, pp.832~840 (1997)
  18. Brunkhorst FM, "Discrimination of infectious and noninfectious causes of early acute respiratory distress syndrome by procalcitonin", Crit Care Med, 27, pp.2172~2176 (1999)
  19. Kuse ER, "Procalcitonin in fever of unknown origin after liver transplantation : a variable to differentiate acute rejection from infection", Crit Care Med, 28, pp.555~559 (2000)
  20. Shin HJ, "Serum procalcitonin levels can be used to differentiate between inflammatory and non-inflammatory diarrhea in acute infectious diarrhea", Medicine(Baltimore), 97, pp.e11795~ (2018)
  21. 김서현, "급성 설사 환자에서 대변 다중중합효소연쇄반응 검사의 유용성", 대한소화기학회지, 79(3), pp.118~125 (2022), 대한소화기학회[DOI]
  22. Mishra V, "Procalcitonin levels in salmonella infection", Indian J Crit Care Med, 19, pp.471~473 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

Usefulness of Measuring Serum Procalcitonin Levels in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease김승원, 김원호, 김태일, 박수정, 천재희, 홍성필, Hye Won Lee, Sook Hee Chung거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2016 · 제10권 제4호Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein in the Diagnosis and Prediction of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Associated With Chronic Severe Hepatitis BLe-Yong Yuan, Ming Wang, Yan Li, Zun-Qiong Ke대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2013 · 제33권 제6호Serum Procalcitonin Is a Candidate Biomarker to Differentiate Bacteremia from Disease Flares in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel DisSeong-Eun Kim거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2016 · 제10권 제4호Fecal Calprotectin Level Reflects the Severity of Clostridium difficile Infection김지은, 김형선, 김희정, 오현주, 용동은, 이경원, 정석훈, 황연지대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2017 · 제37권 제1호Ascitic Fluid Calprotectin and Serum Procalcitonin as Accurate Diagnostic Markers for Spontaneous Bacterial PeritonitisAhmed Abdel-Razik, Dina Elhammady, Mohamed Eissa, Nasser Mousa, Niveen El-Wakeel, Rania Elhelaly, Rasha Elzehery, Sherif Elbaz, Waleed Eldars거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2016 · 제10권 제4호Clinical Utility of Fecal Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin and Calprotectin as Biomarkers of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection김한아, 문희원, 윤여민, 이주원, 허미나대한진단검사의학회 · Laboratory Medicine Online2020 · 제10권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)