Classification of dental implant systems using cloud-based deep learning algorithm: an experimental study
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and clinical usability of implant system classification using automated machine learning on a Google Cloud platform. Methods: Four dental implant systems were selected: Osstem TSIII, Osstem USII, Biomet 3i Os-seotite External, and Dentsply Sirona Xive. A total of 4,800 periapical radiographs (1,200 for each implant system) were collected and labeled based on electronic medical records. Regions of interest were manually cropped to 400×800 pixels, and all images were uploaded to Google Cloud storage. Approximately 80% of the images were used for training, 10% for validation, and 10% for testing. Google automated machine learning (AutoML) Vision automatically executed a neural architecture search technology to apply an appropriate algorithm to the uploaded data. A single-label image classification model was trained using AutoML. The performance of the mod-el was evaluated in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and F1 score. Results: The accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and F1 score of the AutoML Vision model were 0.981, 0.963, 0.961, 0.985, and 0.962, respectively. Osstem TSIII had an accuracy of 100%. Osstem USII and 3i Osseotite External were most often confused in the confusion matrix. Conclusion: Deep learning-based AutoML on a cloud platform showed high accuracy in the classification of dental implant systems as a fine-tuned convolutional neural network. Higher-quality images from various implant systems will be required to improve the performance and clinical usability of the model.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and clinical usability of implant system classification using automated machine learning on a Google Cloud platform. Methods: Four dental implant systems were selected: Osstem TSIII, Osstem USII, Biomet 3i Os-seotite External, and Dentsply Sirona Xive. A total of 4,800 periapical radiographs (1,200 for each implant system) were collected and labeled based on electronic medical records. Regions of interest were manually cropped to 400×800 pixels, and all images were uploaded to Google Cloud storage. Approximately 80% of the images were used for training, 10% for validation, and 10% for testing. Google automated machine learning (AutoML) Vision automatically executed a neural architecture search technology to apply an appropriate algorithm to the uploaded data. A single-label image classification model was trained using AutoML. The performance of the mod-el was evaluated in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and F1 score. Results: The accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and F1 score of the AutoML Vision model were 0.981, 0.963, 0.961, 0.985, and 0.962, respectively. Osstem TSIII had an accuracy of 100%. Osstem USII and 3i Osseotite External were most often confused in the confusion matrix. Conclusion: Deep learning-based AutoML on a cloud platform showed high accuracy in the classification of dental implant systems as a fine-tuned convolutional neural network. Higher-quality images from various implant systems will be required to improve the performance and clinical usability of the model.
참고문헌 (34)
- Steigenga JT, "Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success", Implant Dent, 12, pp.306~317 (2003)
- Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)
- van Steenberghe D, "Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism : a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5, pp.272~281 (1990)
- Buser D, "Tissue integration of one-stage ITI implants : 3-year results of a longitudinal study with Hollow-Cylinder and Hollow-Screw implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6, pp.405~412 (1991)
- Adell R, "Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5, pp.347~359 (1990)
- Al-Johany SS, "Dental implant length and diameter : a proposed classification scheme", J Prosthodont, 26, pp.252~260 (2017)
- Michelinakis G, "Identification of dental implants through the use of Implant Recognition Software(IRS)", Int Dent J, 56, pp.203~208 (2006)
- Jokstad A, "Quality of dental implants", Int Dent J, 53(6 Suppl 2), pp.409~443 (2003)
- Oshida Y, "Dental implant systems", Int J Mol Sci, 11, pp.1580~1678 (2010)
- Jokstad A, "Systematic review of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following oral rehabilitation on dental implants with a tapered compared to a non-tapered implant design", Clin Oral Implants Res, 29(Suppl 16), pp.41~54 (2018)
- Ki-Young Lee, "Clinical study on screw loosening in dental implant prostheses: a 6-year retrospective study", 대한구강악안면외과학회지, 46(2), pp.133~142 (2020), 대한구강악안면외과학회[DOI]
- Dudhia R, "Accuracy of angular measurements and assessment of distortion in the mandibular third molar region on panoramic radiographs", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 111, pp.508~516 (2011)
- Kayal RA, "Distortion of digital panoramic radiographs used for implant site assessment", J Orthod Sci, 5, pp.117~120 (2016)
- Golden JA, "Deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases from breast cancer : helping artificial intelligence be seen", JAMA, 318, pp.2184~2186 (2017)
- Yasaka K, "Deep learning with convolutional neural network in radiology", Jpn J Radiol, 36, pp.257~272 (2018)
- 황재준, "An overview of deep learning in the field of dentistry", Imaging Science in Dentistry, 49(1), pp.1~7 (2019), 대한영상치의학회[DOI]
- Casalegno F, "Caries detection with near-infrared transillumination using deep learning", J Dent Res, 98, pp.1227~1233 (2019)
- Kim JE, "Transfer learning via deep neural networks for implant fixture system classification using periapical radiographs", J Clin Med, 9, pp.1117~ (2020)
- Sukegawa S, "Deep neural networks for dental implant system classification", Biomolecules, 10, pp.984~ (2020)
- Takahashi T, "Identification of dental implants using deep learning-pilot study", Int J Implant Dent, 6, pp.53~ (2020)
- Park W, "Identification of dental implant systems using a large-scale multicenter data set", J Dent Res, 102, pp.727~733 (2023)
- Kong HJ, "Identification of 130 dental implant types using ensemble deep learning", int j oral maxillofac implants, 38, pp.150~156 (2023)
- Deo RC, "Machine learning in medicine", Circulation, 132, pp.1920~1930 (2015)
- Stead WW, "Clinical implications and challenges of artificial intelligence and deep learning", JAMA, 320, pp.1107~1108 (2018)
- Kim IK, "Classification of pachychoroid disease on ultrawide-field indocyanine green angiography using auto-machine learning platform", Br J Ophthalmol, 105, pp.856~861 (2021)
- Zeng Y, "A machine learning model for detecting invasive ductal carcinoma with Google Cloud AutoML Vision", Comput Biol Med, 122, pp.103861~ (2020)
- Faes L, "Automated deep learning design for medical image classification by health-care professionals with no coding experience : a feasibility study", Lancet Digit Health, 1, pp.e232~42 (2019)
- Park W, "Automated deep learning for classification of dental implant radiographs using a large multi-center dataset", Sci Rep, 13, pp.4862~ (2023)
- Griebel L, "A scoping review of cloud computing in healthcare", BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 15, pp.17~ (2015)
- Li Z, "A blockchain and AutoML approach for open and automated customer service", IEEE Trans Ind Inform, 15, pp.3642~3651 (2019)
- Lee JH, "Efficacy of deep convolutional neural network algorithm for the identification and classification of dental implant systems, using panoramic and periapical radiographs : a pilot study", Medicine(Baltimore), 99, pp.e20787~ (2020)
- Wu S, "Clinical and radiologic outcomes of submerged and nonsubmerged bone-level implants with internal hexagonal connections in immediate implantation : a 5-year retrospective study", J Prosthodont, 27, pp.101~107 (2018)
- Uraz A, "Platform-switched implants vs platform-matched implants placed in different implant-abutment interface positions : a prospective randomized clinical and microbiological study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 22, pp.59~68 (2020)
- Karl M, "In vitro characterization of original and nonoriginal implant abutments", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 33, pp.1229~1239 (2018)