Accuracy Analysis of Predicted CODE GIM in the Korean Peninsula
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
One recent notable method for real-time elimination of ionospheric errors in geodetic applications is the Predicted Global Ionosphere Map (PGIM). This study analyzes the level of accuracy achievable when applying the PGIM provided by the Center for Orbit Determination of Europe (CODE) to the Korean Peninsula region. First, an examination of the types and lead times of PGIMs provided by the International GNSS Service (IGS) Analysis Center revealed that CODE's two-day prediction model, C2PG, is available approximately eight hours before midnight. This suggests higher real-time usability compared to the oneday prediction model, C1PG. When evaluating the accuracy of PGIM by assuming the final output of the Global Ionosphere Map (GIM) as a reference, it was found that on days with low solar activity, the error is within ~2 TECU, and on days with high solar activity, the error reaches ~3 TECU. A comparison of the errors introduced when using PGIM and three solar activity indices—Kp index, F10.7, and sunspot number—revealed that F10.7 exhibits a relatively high correlation coefficient compared to Kp-index and sunspot number, confirming the effectiveness of the prediction model.
Abstract
One recent notable method for real-time elimination of ionospheric errors in geodetic applications is the Predicted Global Ionosphere Map (PGIM). This study analyzes the level of accuracy achievable when applying the PGIM provided by the Center for Orbit Determination of Europe (CODE) to the Korean Peninsula region. First, an examination of the types and lead times of PGIMs provided by the International GNSS Service (IGS) Analysis Center revealed that CODE's two-day prediction model, C2PG, is available approximately eight hours before midnight. This suggests higher real-time usability compared to the oneday prediction model, C1PG. When evaluating the accuracy of PGIM by assuming the final output of the Global Ionosphere Map (GIM) as a reference, it was found that on days with low solar activity, the error is within ~2 TECU, and on days with high solar activity, the error reaches ~3 TECU. A comparison of the errors introduced when using PGIM and three solar activity indices—Kp index, F10.7, and sunspot number—revealed that F10.7 exhibits a relatively high correlation coefficient compared to Kp-index and sunspot number, confirming the effectiveness of the prediction model.
참고문헌 (11)
- "Ionospheric Products"[URL]
- Jin, X., "Near real-time global ionospheric total electron content modeling and nowcasting based on GNSS observations", Journal of Geodesy, 97, pp.27~ (2023)[DOI]
- 김민규, "GPS Klobuchar 전리층 모델의 장기간 정확도 분석", 한국항공운항학회지, 24(2), pp.11~17 (2016), 한국항공운항학회
- John Klobuchar, "Ionospheric Time-Delay Algorithm for Single-Frequency GPS Users", IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, AES-23(3), pp.325~331 (1987), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)[DOI]
- 이창문, "단일주파수 GNSS 수신기용 실시간 전리층 지연 보정 모델 비교 : Klobuchar 모델과 NeQuick 모델", 한국측량학회지, 28(4), pp.413~420 (2010), 한국측량학회
- Misra, P., "Global positioning system: Signals, Measurements, and Performance" (2006), Ganga-Jamuna Press
- Xiaodong Ren, "Performance evaluation of real-time global ionospheric maps provided by different IGS analysis centers", GPS Solutions, 23(4) (2019), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- 류경돈, "위성항법시스템의 전리층 보정 가능 영역 확장을 위한 인공 신경망의 성능 분석", 한국항행학회논문지, 22(5), pp.409~414 (2018), 한국항행학회[DOI]
- Schaer, S., "Mapping and predicting the Earth’s ionosphere using the Global Positioning System", pp.1999
- Cheng Wang, "Prediction of global ionospheric VTEC maps using an adaptive autoregressive model", Earth, Planets and Space, 70(1) (2018), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Ya'acob, N., "Ionospheric mapping function for total electron content (TEC) using global positioning system (GPS) data in Malaysia", 2008 IEEE International RF and Microwave Conference, pp.386~390 (2008)