Wide fault에 대한 GBAS 궤도 오차 모니터 성능 분석
Performance Assessment of GBAS Ephemeris Monitor for Wide Faults
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Galileo is a European Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) that has offered the Galileo Open Service since 2016. Consequently, the standardization of GNSS augmentation systems, such as Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS), Ground Based Augmentation System (GBAS), and Aircraft Based Augmentation System (ABAS) for Galileo signals, is ongoing. In 2023, the European Union Space Programme Agency (EUSPA) released prior probabilities of a satellite fault and a constellation fault for Galileo, which are 3×10-5 and 2×10-4 per hour, respectively. In particular, the prior probability of a Galileo constellation fault is significantly higher than that for the GPS constellation fault, which is defined as 1×10-8 per hour. This raised concerns about its potential impact on GBAS integrity monitoring. According to the Global Positioning System (GPS) Standard Positioning Service Performance Standard (SPS PS), a constellation fault is classified as a wide fault. A wide fault refers to a fault that affects more than two satellites due to a common cause. Such a fault can be caused by a failure in the Earth Orientation Parameter (EOP). The EOP is used when transforming the inertial axis, on which the orbit determination is based, to Earth Centered Earth Fixed (ECEF) axis, accounting for the irregularities in the rotation of the Earth. Therefore, a faulty EOP can introduce errors when computing a satellite position with respect to the ECEF axis. In GNSS, the ephemeris parameters are estimated based on the positions of satellites and are transmitted to navigation satellites. Subsequently, these ephemeris parameters are broadcasted via the navigation message to users. Therefore, a faulty EOP results in erroneous broadcast ephemeris data. In this paper, we assess the conventional ephemeris fault detection monitor currently employed in GBAS for wide faults, as current GBAS considers only single failure cases. In addition to the existing requirements defined in the standards on the Probability of Missed Detection (PMD), we derive a new PMD requirement tailored for a wide fault. The compliance of the current ephemeris monitor to the derived requirement is evaluated through a simulation. Our findings confirm that the conventional monitor meets the requirement even for wide fault scenarios.
Abstract
Galileo is a European Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) that has offered the Galileo Open Service since 2016. Consequently, the standardization of GNSS augmentation systems, such as Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS), Ground Based Augmentation System (GBAS), and Aircraft Based Augmentation System (ABAS) for Galileo signals, is ongoing. In 2023, the European Union Space Programme Agency (EUSPA) released prior probabilities of a satellite fault and a constellation fault for Galileo, which are 3×10-5 and 2×10-4 per hour, respectively. In particular, the prior probability of a Galileo constellation fault is significantly higher than that for the GPS constellation fault, which is defined as 1×10-8 per hour. This raised concerns about its potential impact on GBAS integrity monitoring. According to the Global Positioning System (GPS) Standard Positioning Service Performance Standard (SPS PS), a constellation fault is classified as a wide fault. A wide fault refers to a fault that affects more than two satellites due to a common cause. Such a fault can be caused by a failure in the Earth Orientation Parameter (EOP). The EOP is used when transforming the inertial axis, on which the orbit determination is based, to Earth Centered Earth Fixed (ECEF) axis, accounting for the irregularities in the rotation of the Earth. Therefore, a faulty EOP can introduce errors when computing a satellite position with respect to the ECEF axis. In GNSS, the ephemeris parameters are estimated based on the positions of satellites and are transmitted to navigation satellites. Subsequently, these ephemeris parameters are broadcasted via the navigation message to users. Therefore, a faulty EOP results in erroneous broadcast ephemeris data. In this paper, we assess the conventional ephemeris fault detection monitor currently employed in GBAS for wide faults, as current GBAS considers only single failure cases. In addition to the existing requirements defined in the standards on the Probability of Missed Detection (PMD), we derive a new PMD requirement tailored for a wide fault. The compliance of the current ephemeris monitor to the derived requirement is evaluated through a simulation. Our findings confirm that the conventional monitor meets the requirement even for wide fault scenarios.
참고문헌 (20)
- "Global Positioning System Standard Positioning Service Performance Standard (GPS SPS PS)", U.S. Department of Defense, A-22~ (2008)
- Guilbert, A., "Optimal GPS", Galileo GBAS Methodologies with an Application to Troposphere, Université de Toulouse, 2016
- "GBAS CAT II/III development baseline SARPs" (2009)[URL]
- ICAO, "Proposed amendments to Annex 10 GBAS provisions", Navigation System Panel (NSP), ~ (2015)
- ICAO, "Annex 10 Radio Navigation Aids, Vol.1", Amendments, 91 (2018)
- Lee, J., "Assessment of Ionosphere Spatial Decorrelation for Global Positioning System-Based Aircraft Landing Systems", Journal of Aircraft, 44, pp.1662~1669 (2007)[DOI]
- McGraw, G. A., "Development of the LAAS Accuracy Models", Proceedings of ION GPS 2000, pp.1212~1223 (2000)
- Murphy, T., "Alternative Architecture for Dual Frequency Multi-Constellation GBAS", Proceedings of the 34th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2021), pp.1334~1374 (2021)
- Patel, J., "Detecting Hazardous Spatial Gradients at Satellite Acquisition in GBAS", IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 56, pp.3214~3230 (2020)[DOI]
- Perea Díaz, S, "Analysis of ARAIM Against EOP GPS-Galileo Faults on LPV-200 Precision Approach", Proceedings of the 27th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+2014), pp.3575~3586 (2014)
- Pervan, B., "Orbit Ephemeris Monitors for Local Area Differential GPS", IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 14, pp.449~460 (2005)[DOI]
- Pullen, S, "Augmented GNSS: Fundamentals and Keys to Integrity and Continuity", proceeding of ION GNSS 2012 (2012)
- RTCA, "DO-245, Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards (MOPS) for the Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS)", ~ (2004)
- RTCA, "DO-229E, Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) for GPSWAAS Airborne Equipment", ~ (2016)
- D3.7.1 Threat identification and Integrity Allocation, SESAR project report, "SESAR", ~ (2015)
- SESAR, "DFMC GBAS Conceptual Framework, H2020-SESAR-2015", 2, 2018
- Song, J., "Working Paper, Dual Fault Consideration for Galileo – DFMC GBAS", presented at EUROCAE WG28 N50 virtual meeting (2021)
- Tang, H., "Ephemeris type a fault analysis and mitigation for LAAS", IEEE, 2010, 654~666
- Wallner, S., "Galileo H-ARAIM: Update on performance Characterization and Integrity Support Message", Proceedings of the 36th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2023), pp.1083~1098 (2023)
- WG-C Advanced RAIM Technical Subgroup, "Reference Airborne Algorithm Description Document (ADD), Version 3.1", ARAIM TSG, ~ (2019)