Assessing Compliance with the Wildlife Crossing Guideline in South Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
To restore the connectivity of fragmented habitats, 415 wildlife crossings have been built between 1998 and 2014 in South Korea. However, their effect on wildlife conservation is still in doubt. As a first step to examine the effectiveness, our study aims to assess compliance with the guideline for wildlife crossing construction and management, developed by the Ministry of Environment Korea that provides fundamental information to understand the status and the problem of wildlife crossings in Korea and thus to provide practical guidance for the improvement. According to our survey, the Korea National Park Service complied with the guideline best (62.5%) while local government followed the guideline least (46.1%). In addition, the compliance rate was the highest for wildlife crossings in national roads (53.6%) followed by highways (53.2%) and local and municipal roads (52.2%). For the overpass wildlife crossings, the compliance rates for installation of an escaping facility in the drainage and prevention of pedestrian and vehicle access were particularly low. In case of underpass wildlife crossings, small ditches for amphibians and reptiles were not sufficient, and the linkage between wildlife fences and underpass were weak. In order to ensure the effectiveness of wildlife crossings, the effort to increase the compliance rate with the guideline is critical, and mandating the guideline could be a practical way to enforce the compliance.
Abstract
To restore the connectivity of fragmented habitats, 415 wildlife crossings have been built between 1998 and 2014 in South Korea. However, their effect on wildlife conservation is still in doubt. As a first step to examine the effectiveness, our study aims to assess compliance with the guideline for wildlife crossing construction and management, developed by the Ministry of Environment Korea that provides fundamental information to understand the status and the problem of wildlife crossings in Korea and thus to provide practical guidance for the improvement. According to our survey, the Korea National Park Service complied with the guideline best (62.5%) while local government followed the guideline least (46.1%). In addition, the compliance rate was the highest for wildlife crossings in national roads (53.6%) followed by highways (53.2%) and local and municipal roads (52.2%). For the overpass wildlife crossings, the compliance rates for installation of an escaping facility in the drainage and prevention of pedestrian and vehicle access were particularly low. In case of underpass wildlife crossings, small ditches for amphibians and reptiles were not sufficient, and the linkage between wildlife fences and underpass were weak. In order to ensure the effectiveness of wildlife crossings, the effort to increase the compliance rate with the guideline is critical, and mandating the guideline could be a practical way to enforce the compliance.
참고문헌 (9)
- Beckmann JP, "Safe passages: highways, wildlife, and habitat connectivity" (2010), Island Press
- 최태영, "국내 포유동물에 적합한 생태통로의 유형과 규격", 환경영향평가, 21(1), pp.209~218 (2012), 한국환경영향평가학회
- De Montis A, "Landscape planning and defragmentation measures: an assessment of costs and critical issues", Land Use Policy, 72, pp.313~324 (2018)[DOI]
- Glista DJ, "A review of mitigation measures for reducing wildlife morality on roadways", Landscape Urban Plan, 91, pp.1~7 (2009)[DOI]
- Accounting for rapid economic growth in Korea, 1963-1995, "Kim K", Korea Development Institute, ~ (1997)
- Ministry of Environment, "Guidelines for design and management of wildlife crossing structures in Korea", Ministry of Environment, ~ (2003)
- Ministry of Environment, "Guidelines for design and management of wildlife crossing structures in Korea", Ministry of Environment, ~ (2010)
- "Wildlife Crossing Network" (2017)[URL]
- "Statistics System"[URL]
