본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

산림경영인증의 사회ㆍ경제적 효과 분석: 제주시험림의 사례

Social and Economic Effects of Forest Management Certification: a Case of Jeju Experimental Forest

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purposes of the research in related to FSC in JuJe experimental forests (JJEFs) is to make pre and post socio-economic comparisons and play an important role of FSC, and recognition change to FSC timbers and to make an analysis to consumers' needs. As the results of onsite survey in 2005, respondents show a high awareness of SFM and FSC in comparisons of 2004, and the JJEFs play a critical role to make SFM and FSC advertisement worldwide, such as consumers' satisfaction to SFM and FSC is high. Hence provision of JJEF information such as job creation and socio-economic impacts to stockholders could make their satisfaction improving. Most of respondents to the FSC of JJEF represent a positive rate while low awareness to FSC timber is represented. Therefore, necessary information about JJEF FSC with forest management, process and consumption pattern of FSC is required into citizens. The final results prove that FSC effects such as 1.3 billion won direct additional benefits in terms of socio-economic aspects including environmental benefits and job creation and economic effects are enough to offset 1.3 billion won additional costs.

Abstract

The purposes of the research in related to FSC in JuJe experimental forests (JJEFs) is to make pre and post socio-economic comparisons and play an important role of FSC, and recognition change to FSC timbers and to make an analysis to consumers' needs. As the results of onsite survey in 2005, respondents show a high awareness of SFM and FSC in comparisons of 2004, and the JJEFs play a critical role to make SFM and FSC advertisement worldwide, such as consumers' satisfaction to SFM and FSC is high. Hence provision of JJEF information such as job creation and socio-economic impacts to stockholders could make their satisfaction improving. Most of respondents to the FSC of JJEF represent a positive rate while low awareness to FSC timber is represented. Therefore, necessary information about JJEF FSC with forest management, process and consumption pattern of FSC is required into citizens. The final results prove that FSC effects such as 1.3 billion won direct additional benefits in terms of socio-economic aspects including environmental benefits and job creation and economic effects are enough to offset 1.3 billion won additional costs.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. Cha JH, "Stake-holders Perceptions on Forest Certification with a Special Reference to Forest Owners, Wood Products Manufacturers and Consumers", 석사, pp.2003
  2. Ebeling J, "The Effectiveness of Market-Based Conservation in the Tropics: Forest Certification in Ecuador and Bolivia", J Environ Manage, 90, pp.1145~1153 (2009)
  3. Joo RW, "The Potential Impacts of Recent Developments in Timber Certification Schemes on the Korean Forest Products Trade", J Korean For Soc, 89, pp.368~377 (2000)
  4. Korea Forest Service, "Basic Act for Forest", ~ (2001)
  5. Overdevest C, "Forest Certification and Institutional Governance: An Empirical Study of Forest Stewardship Council Certificate Holders in the United States", Forest Policy and Economics, 9, pp.93~102 (2006)
  6. Owari T, "Strategies, Functions and Benefits of Forest Certification in Wood Products Marketing: Perspectives of Finnish Suppliers", Forest Policy and Economics, 9, pp.380~391 (2006)
  7. Rickenbach M, "Forest Certification of Small Ownerships: Some Practical Challenges", Journal of Forestry, 100, pp.43~47 (2002)
  8. Vlosky RP, "Environmental Certification of Wood Products: the US Manufacturers' Perspective", Forest Products Journal, 48, pp.21~26 (1998)
  9. Yoon KB, "A study on the Forest Certification for Sustainable Forest Management (SFM)", Korean Forest Economics Society, 15, pp.35~48 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)