Barriers to Realization of Forestry Mitigation Potential in India
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Implementation of mitigation options on land is important for realisation of the goals of the Paris Agreement to stabilize temperature at 2°C. In India, the Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC) targets include a forestry goal of creation of carbon sinks of 2.5 to 3 billion tonnes by 2030. There are however, multiple barriers to implementation of forestry mitigation options in India. They include environmental, social, financial, technological and institutional barriers. The barriers are varied not just across land categories but also for a land category depending on its regional location and distribution. In addition to these barriers is the impeding climate change that places at risk realisation of the mitigation potential as rising temperatures, drought, and fires associated with projected climate change may lead to forests becoming a weaker sink or a net carbon source before the end of the century.
Abstract
Implementation of mitigation options on land is important for realisation of the goals of the Paris Agreement to stabilize temperature at 2°C. In India, the Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC) targets include a forestry goal of creation of carbon sinks of 2.5 to 3 billion tonnes by 2030. There are however, multiple barriers to implementation of forestry mitigation options in India. They include environmental, social, financial, technological and institutional barriers. The barriers are varied not just across land categories but also for a land category depending on its regional location and distribution. In addition to these barriers is the impeding climate change that places at risk realisation of the mitigation potential as rising temperatures, drought, and fires associated with projected climate change may lead to forests becoming a weaker sink or a net carbon source before the end of the century.
참고문헌 (26)
- Betts RA, "The role of ecosystem-atmosphere interactions in simulated Amazonian precipitation decrease and forest dieback under global climate warming", Theor Appl Climatol, 78, pp.157~175 (2004)
- Clark JS, "The impacts of increasing drought on forest dynamics, structure, and biodiversity in the United States", Glob Change Biol, 22, pp.2329~2352 (2016)
- de Boer IJM, "Greenhouse gas mitigation in animal production : towards an integrated life cycle sustainability assessment", Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 3, pp.423~431 (2011)
- Forneri C, "Keeping the forest for the climate’s sake : avoiding deforestation in developing countries under the UNFCCC", Clim Policy, 6, pp.275~294 (2006)
- "India’s intended nationally determined contribution: working towards climate justice" (2015)[URL]
- Gurney KR, "Regional trends in terrestrial carbon exchange and their seasonal signatures", Tellus B Chem Phys Meteorol, 63, pp.328~339 (2011)
- Halvorson JJ, "Repeated applications of tannins and related phenolic compounds are retained by soil and affect cation exchange capacity", Soil Biol Biochem, 43, pp.1139~1147 (2011)
- Herold M, "Linking requirements with capabilities for deforestation monitoring in the context of the UNFCCCREDD process", Environ Res Lett, 2, pp.045025~ (2007)
- Huettner M, "Risks and opportunities of REDD+ implementation for environmental integrity and socio-economic compatibility", Environ Sci Policy, 15, pp.4~12 (2012)
- IPCC, "Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Working Group II Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change", pp.1~32 (2014), Cambridge University Press
- Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, "IPCC", Cambridge University Press, ~ (2014)
- Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, "IPCC", Cambridge University Press, ~ (2007)
- Körner C, "Through enhanced tree dynamics carbon dioxide enrichment may cause tropical forests to lose carbon", Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 359, pp.493~498 (2004)
- Lederer M, "From CDM to REDD+: What do we know for setting up effective and legitimate carbon governance", Ecol Econ, 70, pp.1900~1907 (2011)
- Madlener R, "A Sustainability Framework for Enhancing the Long-Term Success of LULUCF Projects", Climatic Change, 75, pp.241~271 (2006)
- Murdiyarso D, "Some lessons learned from the first generation of REDD+activities", Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 4, pp.678~685 (2012)
- Nonhebel S, "Renewable energy and food supply: will there be enough land", Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 9, pp.191~201 (2005)
- Palmer C, "Property rights and liability for deforestation under REDD+ : Implications for ‘permanence’ in policy design", Ecol Econ, 70, pp.571~576 (2011)
- Rosendal GK, "Institutional design for improved forest governance through REDD : Lessons from the global environment facility", Ecol Econ, 70, pp.1908~1915 (2011)
- Schröter D, "Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe", Science, 310, pp.1333~1337 (2005)
- Smith P, "Climate Change Mitigation and Agriculture", pp.50~57 (2012), Earthscan
- Streck C, "Financing REDD+ : matching needs and ends", Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 4, pp.628~637 (2012)
- Thompson MC, "Seeing REDD+ as a project of environmental governance", Environ Sci Policy, 14, pp.100~110 (2011)
- Tubiello FN, "Carbon financial mechanisms for agriculture and rural development : challenges and opportunities along the Bali roadmap", Clim Chang, 97, pp.3~21 (2009)
- UNDP International Poverty Centre, "What is poverty? Who asks? Who answers" (2006), International Poverty Centre
- UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change), "Adoption of the Paris Agreement. FCCC", CP, 10, pp.Add.1 (2015)[DOI]