The Process and Method to Set a Mountainous Scenic Site’s Designated Area
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A “Scenic Site” is an official heritage category legally defined as a “scenic site of outstanding artistic value with excellent scenic views.” However, the subjective interpretation of the term causes several problems. This study suggested a systematic, organized process of designating a listed area as a scenic site after careful and detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis. Indicators were identified for each of the two analyses, and then scored and weighted. Quantitative indicators were distributed within 5 points for each indicator. Water, which is a natural indicator, based on distance from river boundaries. Forest landscapes were assigned in consideration of forest physiognomy and age class. Land use was allocated in consideration of land cover type and, in case of development site, ‘-’ score was assigned. Cultural heritage conservation area, which is historical and cultural indicator, was distributed by distance within a maximum of 500 meters. Visibility, an indicator of landscape value, was assigned according to the frequency of visibility. The weight of each indicator was calculated by considering the value of each item. The weight of distribution of cultural resources is relatively high, while other items were set the same. In case of land use, however, ‘-’ score was given according to the grade. Qualitative indicators, on the other hand, were considered terrain, landscape zone, ownership, intellectual boundary, and land category. The applicability of the proposed process and method was examined by applying the existing methods and criteria used for designating scenic spots. Opinions of subject-matter experts were incorporated in the identification of the indicators and in the result review stage. In the future, it is necessary to apply this method while designating scenic sites so as to establish an objective, scientific designation process.
Abstract
A “Scenic Site” is an official heritage category legally defined as a “scenic site of outstanding artistic value with excellent scenic views.” However, the subjective interpretation of the term causes several problems. This study suggested a systematic, organized process of designating a listed area as a scenic site after careful and detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis. Indicators were identified for each of the two analyses, and then scored and weighted. Quantitative indicators were distributed within 5 points for each indicator. Water, which is a natural indicator, based on distance from river boundaries. Forest landscapes were assigned in consideration of forest physiognomy and age class. Land use was allocated in consideration of land cover type and, in case of development site, ‘-’ score was assigned. Cultural heritage conservation area, which is historical and cultural indicator, was distributed by distance within a maximum of 500 meters. Visibility, an indicator of landscape value, was assigned according to the frequency of visibility. The weight of each indicator was calculated by considering the value of each item. The weight of distribution of cultural resources is relatively high, while other items were set the same. In case of land use, however, ‘-’ score was given according to the grade. Qualitative indicators, on the other hand, were considered terrain, landscape zone, ownership, intellectual boundary, and land category. The applicability of the proposed process and method was examined by applying the existing methods and criteria used for designating scenic spots. Opinions of subject-matter experts were incorporated in the identification of the indicators and in the result review stage. In the future, it is necessary to apply this method while designating scenic sites so as to establish an objective, scientific designation process.
참고문헌 (16)
- 최상현, "산지전용허가 의사결정지원시스템의 실제 운용가능성에 관한 연구", Journal of forest and environmental science, 30(1), pp.45~49 (2014), 산림과학연구소[DOI]
- A study on investigating landscape resources and building the DB, "Cultural Heritage Administration", ~, pp.No. 11-1550011-000451-01 (2011)
- Preservation and application plan by national designation, "Cultural Heritage Administration", ~, pp.No. 11-1550000-001530-01 (2014)
- "Cultural Heritage Administration" (2019)[URL]
- 하태일, "계곡 명승의 효과적인 경관보호를 위한 구역 설정기법 개발", 한국전통조경학회지, 32(3), pp.183~190 (2014), 한국전통조경학회[DOI]
- 강미희, "산림경관 등급화를 위한 평가지표 개발", 한국산림과학회지, 99(6), pp.777~784 (2010), 한국산림과학회
- 김경남, "강원지역 계곡의 물리적 특성 및 고요함 분석", Journal of forest and environmental science, 30(1), pp.152~160 (2014), 산림과학연구소[DOI]
- "Scenic Site" (2019)[URL]
- "Cultural property protection act" (2018)[URL]
- 이관규, "산림경관의 시각적 관리등급 설정기법 현장적용 연구 - 하이원 리조트 일대의 산림경관을 중심으로 -", 환경영향평가, 22(1), pp.65~78 (2013), 한국환경영향평가학회
- 이관규, "시각적 질 평가에 의한 산림경관 관리구역 구획방법", 한국산림과학회지, 101(1), pp.148~157 (2012), 한국산림과학회
- Establishment of National Park Plan Feasibility Study Criteria, "Ministry of Environment", ~ (1999)
- A Study on Management of Forest Recreation and Landscape Resources, "National Institute of Forest Science", ~ (2004)
- Forest Landscape Resources Survey and Landscape Plan, "National Institute of Forest Science", ~ (2012)
- 박정묵, "Evaluation of a Land Use Change Matrix in the IPCC’s Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry Area Sector Using National Spatial Information", Journal of forest and environmental science, 33(4), pp.295~304 (2017), 산림과학연구소
- 신승진, "명승지정을 위한 세부 평가 항목에 관한 연구-영월 동강 어라연 지역을 중심으로-", 한국전통조경학회지, 영문(4), pp.102~110 (2006), 한국전통조경학회
