본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Regulatory Frameworks for South Korea’s Offshore Caron Capture and Storage (CCS) Activities

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This article provides a comparative review of existing Korean regulations against model regulatory frameworks for carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects within South Korean waters. Its analysis will demonstrate that South Korea’s existing environmental laws and existing international conventions to regulate offshore CCS activities can be used to draft a robust stand-alone legal framework appropriate for offshore CCS storage projects in South Korean waters. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a technology that could enable nations that emit greenhouse gases from their industrial activities to capture the emission before they reach the atmosphere and to place those greenhouse gases into deep geological storage. CCS re-purposes a pre-existing technology which injected carbon dioxide (CO2) into geological formations to enhance the production of crude oil from older fields; in those operations, it was discovered that most of the injected CO2 never returned to the surface, suggesting the potential to store CO2 in that manner. While some green scholars and activists oppose its implementation, many have seen CCS as a potential bridging technology to enable earlier reductions in net greenhouse gas emissions while maintaining industrial output levels, until greener technological alternatives are mainstays of industrial economies. These carbon storage activities could be undertaken both onshore and offshore of the industrial economies. Because Korea has few suitable onshore storage locations for carbon storage, it will need to plan for offshore CCS operations. Legally, this could be fortuitous, as it would reduce the complexity of overlapping national and local administration issues and further could take inspiration from pre-existing international conventions on offshore CCS activities, such as under the 1996 Protocol to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter (“London Protocol”), the EU’s Directive on the Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide (“the CCS Directive”), OSPAR Decision 2007/2 for the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (“OSPAR Convention”), and the Decision 10/CMP.7 of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol, under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. This article evaluates these conventions comparatively with a variety of South Korean environmental enactments to find that if South Korea brought together its laws with key elements from those conventions, then South Korea could create and enact a leading model for offshore CCS storage projects.

Abstract

This article provides a comparative review of existing Korean regulations against model regulatory frameworks for carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects within South Korean waters. Its analysis will demonstrate that South Korea’s existing environmental laws and existing international conventions to regulate offshore CCS activities can be used to draft a robust stand-alone legal framework appropriate for offshore CCS storage projects in South Korean waters. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a technology that could enable nations that emit greenhouse gases from their industrial activities to capture the emission before they reach the atmosphere and to place those greenhouse gases into deep geological storage. CCS re-purposes a pre-existing technology which injected carbon dioxide (CO2) into geological formations to enhance the production of crude oil from older fields; in those operations, it was discovered that most of the injected CO2 never returned to the surface, suggesting the potential to store CO2 in that manner. While some green scholars and activists oppose its implementation, many have seen CCS as a potential bridging technology to enable earlier reductions in net greenhouse gas emissions while maintaining industrial output levels, until greener technological alternatives are mainstays of industrial economies. These carbon storage activities could be undertaken both onshore and offshore of the industrial economies. Because Korea has few suitable onshore storage locations for carbon storage, it will need to plan for offshore CCS operations. Legally, this could be fortuitous, as it would reduce the complexity of overlapping national and local administration issues and further could take inspiration from pre-existing international conventions on offshore CCS activities, such as under the 1996 Protocol to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter (“London Protocol”), the EU’s Directive on the Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide (“the CCS Directive”), OSPAR Decision 2007/2 for the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (“OSPAR Convention”), and the Decision 10/CMP.7 of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol, under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. This article evaluates these conventions comparatively with a variety of South Korean environmental enactments to find that if South Korea brought together its laws with key elements from those conventions, then South Korea could create and enact a leading model for offshore CCS storage projects.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Kevin Bullis, "Skipping the Water in Fracking", MIT Technology Review (2013)
  2. 채선영, "이산화탄소 포집 및 저장 실용화를 위한 국내 정책 연구", 해양환경안전학회지, 18(6), pp.617~625 (2012), 해양환경안전학회[DOI]
  3. EIA, "South Korea: International Energy Data and Analysis" (2016), U.S. Energy Information Agency
  4. Michael G. Faure, "Carbon Capture and Storage: Efficient Policies for Risk Governance and Compensation" (2017), MIT Press
  5. Ian Havercroft, "Global CCS Institute CCS Legal and Regulatory: A Global Assessment of National Legal and Regulatory Regimes for Carbon Capture and Storage" (2015), Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute
  6. Kurt Zenz House, "Permanent carbon dioxide storage in deep-sea sediments", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(33), pp.12291~12295 (2006)
  7. 장은선, "이산화탄소 지중저장의 환경 관리를 위한 미국과 유럽연합의 법·제도 현황과 시사점", 지하수토양환경, 17(6), pp.9~22 (2012), 한국지하수토양환경학회
  8. Heon Kang, "환경분야 CCS(이산화탄소 포집및 저장)에 대한 법적근거 마련 연구" (2012), Korean Ministry of Environment, National Institute of Environmental Research
  9. S.G. Kang, "R&D Status on Offshore CCS Technology and its Deployment Plan in Korea", Proceedings of the Conference for the Korean Society for Marine Environment & Energy, 177 (2011)
  10. 고문현, "미국 환경보호청(EPA)의 이산화탄소 지중저장 규칙과 그 시사점", 법학연구, 24(4), pp.19~40 (2016), 법학연구소
  11. H. Koide, "Deep Sub-Seabed Disposal of CO2 – The Most Protective Storage", Energy Conversion and Management, 38(Suppl), pp.S253~S258 (1997)
  12. 권이균, "포항분지 해상 중소규모 CO2 저장 실증연구", 지질공학, 28(2), pp.133~160 (2018), 대한지질공학회[DOI]
  13. 이재협, "녹색성장기본법의 친환경적 실현을 위한 법적 수단 - 기후변화 대응 시장적 메커니즘을 중심으로", 환경법연구, 31(1), pp.39~62 (2009), 한국환경법학회
  14. 이준서, "이산화탄소 포집 및 저장(CCS)으로 인한 리스크 관리를 위한 법적 과제", 환경법연구, 40(1), pp.79~110 (2018), 한국환경법학회[DOI]
  15. 이순자, "CCS의 사회적 수용성 제고를 위한 법적 과제", 환경법연구, 40(1), pp.41~77 (2018), 한국환경법학회[DOI]
  16. Qi Li, "Prediction of CO2 Leakage During Sequestration into Marine Sedimentary Strata", Energy Conversion and Management, 50, pp.503~509 (2009)
  17. 문흥만, "CO2 해상 지중저장을 위한 주입설비 설계 및 구축 연구", 지질공학, 28(2), pp.207~215 (2018), 대한지질공학회[DOI]
  18. 노현정, "CCS 기술의 CDM 사업화 수용에 대한 방식과 절차 분석 및 대응방안 고찰", 한국해양환경•에너지학회지, 15(3), pp.263~272 (2012), 한국해양환경·에너지학회[DOI]
  19. Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy, "Initiates Feasibility Study on Subsea CO2 Storage", ~ (2016)
  20. 이문지, "온실가스 감축을 위한 이산화탄소 회수․저장사업의 법적 규제", 안암법학, (36), pp.681~739 (2011), 안암법학회[DOI]
  21. Roy A. Partain, "Public and Private Regulations for the Governance of the Risks of Offshore Methane Hydrates", Vt. J. Envt’l L, 17, pp.87~ (2015)
  22. Roy A. Partain, A Comparative Legal Approach for the Risks of Offshore Methane Hydrates : Existing Laws and Conventions, 32 Pace Envt’l L. Rev. 101(, ". Roy A", Partain, The Application of Civil Liability for the Risks of Offshore Methane Hydrates (2015), 26 Fordham Envt’l L. R. 225(2015)
  23. Roy A. Partain, "The Application of Civil Liability for the Risks of Offshore Methane Hydrates", Fordham Envt’l L. R, 26, pp.225~ (2015)
  24. Roy A. Partain, "Avoiding Epimetheus: Planning Ahead for the Commercial Development of Offshore Methane Hydrates", Sustainable Dev. L. &Pol’y, 14, pp.16~58 (2014)
  25. Roy A. Partain, "The Rise of the Regulatory State: The U.S., E.U. and China’s Theory and Practice" (2017)
  26. Daniel P. Schrag, "Storage of Carbon Dioxide in Offshore Sediments", Science, 325, pp.1658~1659 (2009)
  27. Statoil, "Statoil evaluating new CO2 storage project on the Norwegian continental shelf", ~ (2017)
  28. United Nations Environmental Program, "Overview of the Republic of Korea’s National Strategy for Green Growth" (2010), UNEP

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)