본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

통역 교육에서의 난이도와 난이도 요인 — 통역 교육 전문가 조사를 중심으로

Source Text Difficulty in Interpreting Training: Trainers’ Perspective

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

Although source text (ST) difficulty constitutes one of the key criteria for selecting STs for classes and tests in interpreter training, few attempts have been made to explore what makes a given ST difficult for students to interpret and how to assess its difficulty level. The present study, undertaken as part of the author’s PhD research, aims to identify factors affecting ST difficulty in interpreter training. As implied in the use of the term ‘ST’, the scope of the study was confined to intra-textual factors, i.e. factors directly attributable textual features. Following literature review and a pilot study, a set of ST difficulty criteria was produced and categorized into a list of six key areas, i.e. topic, general vocabulary, syntax, logic, information density and re-expression in the target language. Based on this result, an experiment with 13 interpreting teachers was conducted where the participants were provided with 10 texts and asked to provide descriptions of the perceived difficulty and ratings of difficulty level on a Likert scale for individual texts. The result shows that 1) interpreting teachers make their judgment of ST difficulty mainly based on topic; and 2) ST’s overall difficulty rated by the interpreting teachers are strongly correlated with their perceived degree of topic difficulty.

Abstract

Although source text (ST) difficulty constitutes one of the key criteria for selecting STs for classes and tests in interpreter training, few attempts have been made to explore what makes a given ST difficult for students to interpret and how to assess its difficulty level. The present study, undertaken as part of the author’s PhD research, aims to identify factors affecting ST difficulty in interpreter training. As implied in the use of the term ‘ST’, the scope of the study was confined to intra-textual factors, i.e. factors directly attributable textual features. Following literature review and a pilot study, a set of ST difficulty criteria was produced and categorized into a list of six key areas, i.e. topic, general vocabulary, syntax, logic, information density and re-expression in the target language. Based on this result, an experiment with 13 interpreting teachers was conducted where the participants were provided with 10 texts and asked to provide descriptions of the perceived difficulty and ratings of difficulty level on a Likert scale for individual texts. The result shows that 1) interpreting teachers make their judgment of ST difficulty mainly based on topic; and 2) ST’s overall difficulty rated by the interpreting teachers are strongly correlated with their perceived degree of topic difficulty.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 곽중철, "통번역대학원의 통역 수업 모형 - 협력학습 중심의 영한 순차통역 강의 연구", 통번역학연구, 16(2), pp.85~114 (2012), 통번역연구소
  2. 김한식, "한일 통역 및 번역 강의에 대한 연구조사 - 통역번역대학원 재학생 및 교강사 대상 설문조사 결과를 중심으로", 통역번역연구소 논문집, 6, pp.21~51 (2002)
  3. 박혜경, "국내 통역대학원 교육방법론의 재고(再考) - 1학기 순차통역 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 8(2), pp.61~77 (2006), 한국통역번역학회
  4. 원종화, "한-영 동시통역 시 정보 처리의 방향성 연구: 은유 처리 양상을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2010
  5. 이미경, "번역교육을 위한 텍스트 난이도 평가 기준에 대한 소고", 번역학연구, 13(2), pp.139~164 (2012), 한국번역학회[DOI]
  6. 이상빈, "텍스트 유형론에 기반을 둔 학부번역수업의 운영 사례연구: K. Reiss의 유형론을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 11(3), pp.167~196 (2010), 한국번역학회
  7. 이향, "학부에서의 실용번역 교육에 대한 고찰: 프랑스어문학과에서의 실용번역 교육을 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 13(2), pp.167~186 (2011), 한국통역번역학회
  8. 정혜연, "‘신’연구분야로서의 통번역습득론", 번역학연구, 11(1), pp.191~212 (2010), 한국번역학회
  9. 최인숙, "텍스트의 언어적 난이도 측정 공식 비교 연구 - 초중고 교과서를 중심으로 -", 정보관리학회지, 22(4), pp.173~195 (2005), 한국정보관리학회
  10. Alderson, J. Charles, "Assessing Reading" (2000), Cambridge U
  11. Alexeiva, Bistra, "The Optimum Text in Simultaneous Interpreting: a Cognitive Approach to Interpreter Training, In Teaching Translation and Interpreting: Training, Talent and Experience", pp.221~230 (1992), John Benjamins
  12. Alexeiva, Bistra, "Understanding the Source Language Text in Simultaneous Interpreting", The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 9, pp.45~99 (1999)
  13. Anderson, Anne, "Listening" (1988), Oxford UP
  14. Angelelli, Claudia V, "Using a Rubric to Assess Translation Ability: Defining the Construct, In Testing and Assessment in Translation and Interpreting Studies: a Call for Dialogue Between Research and Practice", pp.13~47 (2009), John Benjamins
  15. Bachman, Lyle, "Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language" (1996), Oxford UP
  16. Barik, Henry C, "Simultaneous Interpretation: Temporal and Quantitative Data", Language and Speech, 16(3), pp.237~270 (1973)
  17. Barik, Henry C, "Simultaneous Interpretation: Qualitative and Linguistic Data", Language and Speech, 18(3), pp.272~297 (1975)
  18. Brown, Gillian, "Teaching the Spoken Language: an Approach Based on the Analysis of Conversational English" (1983), Cambridge UP
  19. Buck, Gary, "Assessing Listening" (2001), Cambridge U
  20. Campbell, Stuart, "Translation & Interpreting Assessment in the Context of Educational Measurement, In Translation Today: Trends and Perspectives", pp.205~224 (2003), Multilingual Matters
  21. Chall, Jeanne S, "Qualitative Assessment of Text Difficulty: a Practical Guide for Teachers and Writers" (1996), Brookline Books
  22. Dillinger, Mike, "Comprehension during Interpreting: What Do Interpreters Know That Bilinguals Don’t?, In Bridging the Gap: Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation", pp.155~189 (1994), John Benjamins
  23. DuBay, William H, "The Principles of Readability" (2004), Impact Information
  24. Farahzad, Farzaneh, "Sequencing Texts on the Basis of Difficulty in a Translation Programme", Translation Studies, 1(1), pp.31~44 (2003)
  25. Gile, Daniel, "Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training" (1995), John Benjamins
  26. Green, Anthony, "Empiricism Versus Connoisseurship: Establishing the Appropriacy of Texts in Test of Academic Reading", Language Testing, 27(2), pp.191~211 (2010)
  27. Hale, Sandra, "The Interaction Between Text Difficulty and Translation Accuracy", Babel, 48(1), pp.14~33 (2002)
  28. Hatim, Basil, "The Translator as Communicator" (1997), Longman
  29. Hönig, Hans G, "Piece of Cake - or Hard to Take? Objective Grades of Difficulty of Speeches Used in Interpreting Training", EMCI Workshop Proceedings, 1 (2002)
  30. Kalina, Sylvia, "Interpreting Competences as a Basis and a Goal for Teaching", The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 10, pp.3~32 (2000)
  31. Lee, Tae-Hyung, "Speech Proportion and Accuracy in Simultaneous Interpretation from English into Korean", Meta, 44(2), pp.260~267 (1999)
  32. Lee, Tae-Hyung, "Simultaneous Listening and Speaking in English into Korean Simultaneous Interpretation", Meta, 44(4), pp.560~572 (1999)
  33. Liu, Minhua, "Assessing Source Material Difficulty for Consecutive Interpreting: Quantifiable Measures and Holistic Judgment", Interpreting, 11(2), pp.244~266 (2009)
  34. Nord, Christiane, "Text Analysis in Translation: Theory, Methodology, and Didactic Application of a Model for Translation-oriented Text Analysis" (2005), Rodopi
  35. Nord, Christiane, "From the “Protective Workshop” to Professional Reality: Grading the Difficulty of Translation Tasks", T&I Review, 1, pp.9~33 (2011)
  36. Pöchhacker, Franz, "Introducing Interpreting Studies" (2004), Routledge
  37. Rudestam, Kjell Erik, "Surviving Your Dissertation: a Comprehensive Guide to Content and Process" (2007), Sage
  38. Sawyer, David, "Fundamental Aspects of Interpreter Education: Curriculum and Assessment" (2004), John Benjamins
  39. Seleskovitch, Danica, "Interpreting for International Conferences: Problems of Language and Communication" (1994), Pen and Booth
  40. Seleskovitch, Danica, "A Systematic Approach to Teaching Interpretation" (1989), The Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
  41. Setton, Robin, "Simultaneous Interpretation: a Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis" (1999), John Benjamins
  42. Setton, Robin, "Pointing to Contexts: A Relevance-theoretic Approach to Assessing Quality and Difficulty in Interpreting, In Knowledge Systems and Translation", pp.275~312 (2005), M. de Gruyter
  43. Tommola, Jorma, "Language Direction and Source Text Difficulty: Effects on Trainee Performance in Simultaneous Interpreting, In Unity in Diversity? Current Trends in Translation Studies", pp.177~186 (1998), St Jerome Publishing
  44. Triesman, Anne M, "Translating and Repeating Back a Foreign and a Native Language", British Journal of Psychology, 56, pp.369~379 (1965)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)